Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumWaPo Squeezes Four Anti-Sanders Stories Out of One Tax Study Over Seven Hours
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/05/11/washington-post-squeezes-four-anti-sanders-stories-out-one-tax-study-over-sevenMissing as well from any of the pieces was any meaningful critical analysis of the studys highly contestable cost projections, as David Himmelstein and Steffie Woolhandlertwo of the nations leading experts on healthcare finance, and co-founders of Physicians for a National Health Programlaid out yesterday in the Huffington Post (5/9/16). Himmelstein and Woolhandler called the Urban Institutes cost estimates ridiculous, saying they ignore the extensive and well-documented experience with single-payer systems in other nationswhich all spend far less per person on healthcare than we do.
Himmelstein and Woolhandler note that the Urban Institute report assumes there will be 100 million more doctor visits per year, despite the fact that the plan does not involve an increase in the number of doctors. The Urban Institute report supposes that the US single-payer system would pay 50 percent more for prescription drugs than Medicaid currently pays, and ignores or minimizes administrative savings from a unified system that add up to $6 trillion over ten years.
While honest people can disagree on these figures, readers were not clued in that there are legitimate healthcare experts who back up Sanders numbers. Instead, on the basis of one report, the Post painted his plan as at best fantastical and at worst a cynical effort to deceive the public on its true cost.
<snip>
Why would so much ink be spilled on a candidate who, by the Posts estimation, cant possibly win? The objective is, of course, to further stigmatize Sanders ideas and platform goalsall of which are deeply antithetical to the editorial and financial bottom line of the paper and its sole owner, Jeff Bezos, whose net worth is over $45 billion.
Its not enough for Sanders to lose, as the Posts editorial board has been expressly rooting for for months; his ideas and the influence he maintains in the party must be snuffed out as well.Why would so much ink be spilled on a candidate who, by the Posts estimation, cant possibly win? The objective is, of course, to further stigmatize Sanders ideas and platform goalsall of which are deeply antithetical to the editorial and financial bottom line of the paper and its sole owner, Jeff Bezos, whose net worth is over $45 billion.
Its not enough for Sanders to lose, as the Posts editorial board has been expressly rooting for for months; his ideas and the influence he maintains in the party must be snuffed out as well.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 414 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo Squeezes Four Anti-Sanders Stories Out of One Tax Study Over Seven Hours (Original Post)
eridani
May 2016
OP
Does anyone know- Is the Washington Post still owned by the Unification Church?
notadmblnd
May 2016
#1
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)1. Does anyone know- Is the Washington Post still owned by the Unification Church?
Just curious
Jubilant18
(62 posts)3. IIRC The Washington Times is the paper you are thinking of. Eom
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)4. Thanks. I think you're right.
CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)2. I think it's time for me to end my membership with Amazon.com.