Bernie Sanders

Baobab

(4,667 posts) Thu May 12, 2016, 05:28 PM May 2016

Could people please save the most egregious examples of sockpuppetry they see to disk.

to disk, in whatever ways they prefer so that there is a historical record of it?

This is so in the future people can see what we were dealing with in this election.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Could people please save the most egregious examples of sockpuppetry they see to disk. (Original Post) Baobab May 2016 OP

I want a blanket script where I can ignore anyone with a username format "name"+2 numbers Warren DeMontague May 2016 #1

I don't have anybody on ignore, even when they are obviously disinformation. Baobab May 2016 #2

No, I dont either. Never used that feature. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #3

But what about those who are so much more subtle... countryjake May 2016 #4

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)

1. I want a blanket script where I can ignore anyone with a username format "name"+2 numbers

Reply to Baobab (Original post)

Thu May 12, 2016, 05:42 PM

May 2016

Like "Brock72" wants to tell you that BERNIE LOST NEENER NEENER

Well, okay.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)

2. I don't have anybody on ignore, even when they are obviously disinformation.

Reply to Warren DeMontague (Reply #1)

Thu May 12, 2016, 05:46 PM

May 2016

as its a data point.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)

3. No, I dont either. Never used that feature.

Reply to Baobab (Reply #2)

Thu May 12, 2016, 05:48 PM

May 2016

Just a joke.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)

4. But what about those who are so much more subtle...

Reply to Warren DeMontague (Reply #1)

Thu May 12, 2016, 06:06 PM

May 2016

This past Monday night, DU was graced with a member who called themselves "LovePeace" whose sole contribution to the site consisted of multiple threads entitled "Jews are swine".

I did capture that viciousness for posterity with my handy snipping tool but wouldn't want to defile my Flickr account by uploading such a nasty pic.

LovePeace, yeah, right.

Reply to this discussion