Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumIt's getting deep in GD:P now.
Defending fracking. Did DU and the party leave me behind and I'm just now noticing it? Or was it always thus, and I had on rose colored glasses? Fucking fracking.
This campaign season has, at the least!, been most illuminating. And it ain't pretty, what I'm finally seeing.
You've heard the phrase "Man Without a Country"? Well, you're about to see 'An Old Woman Without a Party'.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)ebayfool
(3,411 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)think of the profits jobs we'll lose
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)middle eastern countries" because it will be better regulated...
f*** fracking. it is not good for any one or any thing except the corporations to stupid to realize their money won't mean shit when their families are riddled with cancer.
djean111
(14,255 posts)I never thought I would see the day that I would be expected to support a candidate who is for war and fracking and the TPP and the Third Way and lies and cluster bombs. To name a few things. If that is the standard-bearer for the Democratic Party - then, I cannot be a Democrat. Simple as that.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Downwinder
(12,869 posts)Wouldn't take much for my walls to come down.
ebayfool
(3,411 posts)Been through many quakes, and I don't like seeing it posited as an issue to be triaged to death. Our water sucks. Our air sucks. There is no good reason to see Democrats treat it as an academic issue. It affects real damned lives in real damned ways.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)I've been through a few elsewhere and I know this place would come down.
demwing
(16,916 posts)that was our family camping destination each year in the 60s and 70s - the water there was pure and beautiful. I cry for the state of our Party.
ebayfool
(3,411 posts)while. This season's rainfall has helped, but the snow pack that feeds it is still below par. I know people that live along the river that get all their water from it and they have been worried sick.
We are supposed to be rationing, but the oil companies can guzzle galore. The County Supervisors have been making noise about restricting people along the river to cut use, but still push for the CALM museum to build a theme park attachment on the river right across from some of those homes. That would do some major damage to the area and take water needed elsewhere for better uses. Gondola rides, for pete's sake!
Seems the only people that are supposed to be conserving are the general population. Not so much big bidness or oil companies. Though they did limit and/or close the area's water spray parks. Wealthier areas can afford to put in recycling systems to keep theirs open. But it gets 110+ here in the summer, and if there is no place to cool down people are more apt to turn to a water hose and sprinkler to cool down the kids.
A theme park along the river v spray parks v 100's of thousands of water for fracking. Look where the water saving is focused.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Last edited Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:43 PM - Edit history (1)
to sticks and stones and fought over water.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)because we have regulations or something about it. They were being serious too...
lmbradford
(517 posts)Im IN Oklahoma.
Fracking is beyond ridiculous.
corkhead
(6,119 posts)There are people on that list I have no interest in hearing from again.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)If I even stick around here, I will not clear my ignore list because the people there earned their way there. I don't ignore anyone for a one or two post garbage delivery. But if you are consistent, to ignore you go and now will stay permanently.
Duppers
(28,120 posts)Forever.
As Ron White said, "you can't fixed stupid."
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)It's about the D or R after the name. If it was about the issues then no one could tell the difference between Clinton and Bush.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)Just because she has a D behind her name, we're supposed to be ok with that
Triana
(22,666 posts)ebayfool
(3,411 posts)Bernie Sanders Holds Press Conference on Fracking in Spreckels, California (6-1-16)
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)If I wanted to be a republican, I'd already be one. I can't support any party that favors corporatism over people, war over peace, and accepts its leaders making millions of dollars talking to big money interests. Yet here we are in DU awash with support for that.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)They are far to the right of most Americans
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)completely wiping out the legacy of the great democratic presidents of the 20th century.
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)Democratic Underground is an online community for politically liberal people who understand the importance of working within the system to elect more Democrats and fewer Republicans to all levels of political office.
Suggested wording
Democratic Underground is an online community for people who understand the importance of working within the system to elect and permanently seat for life more middle-of-the-road, safe, and pliable Democrats and fewer Republicans to all levels of political office.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)...but at this point is that anything besides just a marketing ploy to get clicks/increase advertising dollars?
cui bono
(19,926 posts)They do not care in the least about policy. It's all idol worship. If it's not that then they are operatives here to push Third Way Crony Capitalism.
.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)against Bernie. That's where their minds go.
.
ebayfool
(3,411 posts)felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)the brocolites want us to think we are the fringe with extreme views, and deny our numbers. It is a psychological struggle happening along with every other level.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Now, they are opponents that liberals have to work against to get things done.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)while they tell progressives to either get on board or take a hike.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Wall Street is fine.
This is not the Democratic Party I grew up with.
AmBlue
(3,110 posts)Are they?
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)-THIS- (!) is how that happens.
In the campaign contests supporters are conditioned to accept and defend where their candidate of choice sits on issues. With HRC sitting out on neoliberal turf, her supporters willingly begin to defend all that is neoliberal.
The problem isn't that people shift to defend their candidate. The problem is that once people work themselves through these wormholes into the politics of the other side, many don't go back. People who have done work tend to sit back and rest on what they've done, believing it was good and for the best.
That game tends to involve the parties sparring around each other in a circle. What they are sparring over is what changes. That they are ever sparring remains constant.