Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 10:45 AM Jun 2016

Clinton pillories Trump’s foreign policy, but history says it won’t help

Tribune News Service
Lesley Clark

WASHINGTON — Presidential contenders often tout their foreign policy credentials. But that may matter little to voters.

In a speech Thursday, Hillary Clinton mocked and pilloried Donald Trump and charged that the real estate magnate is a dangerous threat who can’t be trusted with nuclear weapons. But history shows that in the past 40 years, the candidate with the robust foreign policy portfolio often has lost to the one with the arguably thinner international resume.

In San Diego, the former secretary of state unleashed a torrent of criticism against Trump, calling his ideas a “series of bizarre rants, personal feuds and outright lies.”

She declared him “temperamentally unfit to hold an office that requires knowledge, stability and immense responsibility.” And she warned that his election “would set back our standing in the world more than anything in recent memory.” She accused him of picking fights with U.S. allies while praising dictators and of basing his foreign policy credentials on his experience running the Miss Universe pageant in Russia.

“Imagine him deciding whether to send your spouses or children into battle,” she said. “Imagine if he had not just his Twitter account at his disposal when he’s angry, but America’s entire arsenal.”

But consider history: Gerald Ford had served more than two decades in the House of Representatives, had been vice president and then president — all giving him considerable experience in foreign policy and national security.

(snip ...)

Yet he was defeated in 1976 by Jimmy Carter, a relatively unknown former one-term governor of Georgia with no international experience.

more at link:
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/clinton-pillories-trump%e2%80%99s-foreign-policy-but-history-says-it-won%e2%80%99t-help/ar-BBtNPxS?ocid=spartanntp

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

k8conant

(3,030 posts)
2. It's astounding how often people select incidents from the past
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 10:53 AM
Jun 2016

that support them and ignore those that don't.

This phenomenon may be exacerbated by computers and the Internet. It reminds me of the quoting of statistics and records in sports, e.g. "Doe just hit the very first grand-slam home run in the fourth inning of a seventeenth game of the season south of the Mason-Dixon line."

thereismore

(13,326 posts)
4. Hillary counts on our ignorance, otherwise she could not run with Iraq, Libya and Syria around her
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 11:15 AM
Jun 2016

neck.

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,831 posts)
5. You can be uninterested in dry foreign plcy and still know better than to want stuff blow'd up good.
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 11:43 AM
Jun 2016

I doesn't take a wonk to appreciate how dangerous plenty of what Trump says is. In a way Trump's simpleminded positions make it easy to counter him without going into long unnecessarily detailed explanations.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
6. So, I missed hte damn thing...
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 11:44 AM
Jun 2016

Did Hillary Clinton say what Hillary Clinton's foreign policy is going to be, or did she just stab at Trump the whole time?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Clinton pillories Trump’s...