Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

antigop

(12,778 posts)
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 07:28 PM Jun 2016

H-O-L-Y C-R-A-P! Did Clinton’s Emails Expose CIA Agents?

https://consortiumnews.com/2016/06/05/did-clintons-emails-expose-cia-agents/

The Freedom of information Act (FOIA) requires the government to release all, or all parts of a document, that do not fall under a specific set of allowed exemptions. If information cannot be excluded, it must be released. If some part of a document can be redacted to allow the rest of the document to be released, then that is what must be done. Each redaction must be justified by citing a specific reason for exclusion.

But don’t believe me. Instead, look at page two of this State Department document which lists the exemptions.

Note specifically the different types of “(b)(3)” redactions, including “CIA PERS/ORG.” As common sense would dictate, the government will not release the names of CIA employees via the FOIA process. It would — literally — be against the law. What law? Depending on the nature of the individual’s job at CIA, National Security Act of 1947, the CIA Act of 1949, various laws that govern undercover/clandestine CIA officers and, potentially, the Espionage Act of 1917.

Yet Hillary’s emails contain at least three separate, specific instances where she mentioned in an unclassified email transmitted across the open Internet and wirelessly to her Blackberry the names of CIA personnel. Here they are. Look for the term “(b)(3) CIA PERS/ORG” Click on the links and see for yourself: CIA One; CIA Two; CIA Three
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
H-O-L-Y C-R-A-P! Did Clinton’s Emails Expose CIA Agents? (Original Post) antigop Jun 2016 OP
"also numerous instances of exposure of the names and/or email addresses of NSA employees" nt antigop Jun 2016 #1
YES! onecaliberal Jun 2016 #2
It would appear so farleftlib Jun 2016 #3
Yep MissDeeds Jun 2016 #8
Yes Iraq too farleftlib Jun 2016 #11
^^^THIS^^^ MissDeeds Jun 2016 #14
Orange works farleftlib Jun 2016 #15
and still she lies. nt grasswire Jun 2016 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #5
Dems were up in arms when Cheney did it. But when Hillary does it, no problem. jillan Jun 2016 #6
and not complain. elleng Jun 2016 #10
How is it that she will be able to findrskeep Jun 2016 #7
anyone follow the additional links to stories........wtf nc4bo Jun 2016 #9
K&R felix_numinous Jun 2016 #12
How reckless and twisted, it's appalling. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #13
The codes used as reasons for redaction are listed on page 2 of this document: thereismore Jun 2016 #16
 

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)
8. Yep
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 08:11 PM
Jun 2016

People died when she shilled for and voted for the Iraq war.

Hillary seems to leave dead bodies in her wake.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
11. Yes Iraq too
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 08:21 PM
Jun 2016

and Syria, Honduras and don't even get me started about Libya. She used the same lies
GWB used to get us into Iraq. The very same ones! She lied. The blood she is responsible
for shedding would make a nice sized river. She is not fit to be president. She should be
locked up in striped pj's making big rocks into little ones for the rest of her natural life IMHO.

Response to antigop (Original post)

jillan

(39,451 posts)
6. Dems were up in arms when Cheney did it. But when Hillary does it, no problem.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 08:05 PM
Jun 2016

No problem at all. Let's just make her President.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
9. anyone follow the additional links to stories........wtf
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 08:14 PM
Jun 2016

What is that about Russia having 20k copies because of Guccifer?

What? Is any of this legit?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»H-O-L-Y C-R-A-P! Did Clin...