Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

global1

(25,242 posts)
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 07:01 AM Jun 2016

I Heard Another Theory About The AP Call This A. M.....

that it was intended to get the FBI moving faster to recommend indictment before the convention. Calling it prematurely would set a fire under the FBI to move things along faster.

Any basis to that theory?

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)
3. I think it's bullshit.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 07:13 AM
Jun 2016

This isn't going to make anything go faster. I do, however feel that it was purposeful, deliberate, and about as crooked as they come.

Our election process is so fucked, and nothing will be done to fix it. Watch and see. Even after the DNC said to not count her SD's, the media is doing so.

 

Califonz

(465 posts)
8. Why did the DNC sprain an eyelid
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 08:19 AM
Jun 2016

winking at the press when they told it "not to count the superdelegates" ???

pengu

(462 posts)
4. Nah, it's not that
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 07:24 AM
Jun 2016

It was one final dirty trick in this primary. She was going to lose Cali and get embarrassed so they had to depress Bernie's turnout.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
6. I am worried that the turnout in California is going to be low
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 07:29 AM
Jun 2016

The media will then turn around and blame Sanders for it saying he couldn't energize his supporters. I'd almost bet this is what is going to happen tomorrow.

pengu

(462 posts)
7. There's a chance it will be now
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 08:01 AM
Jun 2016

The casual voters are going to see the morning headlines and think "why bother". It's just another dirty trick in a primary that's been full of them. It's just revolting.

 

Califonz

(465 posts)
9. Sanders voters are much more motivated than those for the other side.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 08:21 AM
Jun 2016

Here's hoping the "why bother" breaks 60-40 in Bernie's favor!

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,122 posts)
12. No question... another new low for the Hillary campaign. Is anyone surprised?
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 08:44 AM
Jun 2016

Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!

Response to InAbLuEsTaTe (Reply #12)

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
5. I don't think so. I think it's simpler and part of the "breaking news/scoop mentality'
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 07:24 AM
Jun 2016

that pervades the narrow perspective of the 24/7 news channels

They need attractions to draw viewers. People who hear such remarkable shit want answers to "what just happened??" and they turn to the media for answers because it's them who just created the breaking news.

Few people in the eastern time zone will stay up late enough to see the returns in CA in real time.

The news outlets want those views...and they got them earlier rather than later.

DebDoo

(319 posts)
14. I'm thinking this is their prefabricated excuse to cover their vote stealing.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 09:01 AM
Jun 2016

Add the "lower voter turnout" with the lack of exit polls and you've got the perfect Clinton coverup

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»I Heard Another Theory Ab...