HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Groups » Bernie Sanders (Group) » WikiLeaks Is About to Rui...

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:27 PM

 

WikiLeaks Is About to Ruin Hillary Clinton’s Chances of Becoming President

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hillary Clinton.

In a recent interview with ITV, Assange said the whistleblowing website will soon be leaking documents that will provide “enough evidence” for the Department of Justice to indict the presumptive Democratic nominee. WikiLeaks has already published 30,322 emails from Clinton’s private email server, spanning from June 30, 2010 to August 12, 2014. While Assange didn’t specify what exactly was in the emails, he did tell ITV that WikiLeaks had “accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton, which could proceed to an indictment.”

http://usuncut.com/politics/wikileaks-could-ruin-hillary-clinton/

video at link..........

64 replies, 4622 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 64 replies Author Time Post
Reply WikiLeaks Is About to Ruin Hillary Clinton’s Chances of Becoming President (Original post)
Pharaoh Jun 2016 OP
Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #1
RufusTFirefly Jun 2016 #2
Phlem Jun 2016 #6
Jackilope Jun 2016 #13
hopemountain Jun 2016 #15
mindwalker_i Jun 2016 #19
MissDeeds Jun 2016 #20
KPN Jun 2016 #21
Live and Learn Jun 2016 #24
JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #27
Dawgs Jun 2016 #38
Bob41213 Jun 2016 #44
kayakjohnny Jun 2016 #57
Duval Jun 2016 #3
Pharaoh Jun 2016 #4
Duval Jun 2016 #7
InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #12
pokerfan Jun 2016 #16
Live and Learn Jun 2016 #25
Scootaloo Jun 2016 #30
Live and Learn Jun 2016 #31
pokerfan Jun 2016 #32
dorkzilla Jun 2016 #43
2banon Jun 2016 #28
SmittynMo Jun 2016 #34
2banon Jun 2016 #39
MinnesotaRob Jun 2016 #46
2banon Jun 2016 #60
Name removed Jun 2016 #61
2banon Jun 2016 #62
jalan48 Jun 2016 #5
Phlem Jun 2016 #8
Xipe Totec Jun 2016 #17
snot Jun 2016 #51
Pharaoh Jun 2016 #9
jalan48 Jun 2016 #11
GreenPartyVoter Jun 2016 #35
totodeinhere Jun 2016 #40
Pharaoh Jun 2016 #10
Jackilope Jun 2016 #14
KPN Jun 2016 #22
Jackilope Jun 2016 #23
totodeinhere Jun 2016 #41
SmittynMo Jun 2016 #18
alc Jun 2016 #26
-none Jun 2016 #29
magical thyme Jun 2016 #33
HereSince1628 Jun 2016 #36
Pastiche423 Jun 2016 #50
blackspade Jun 2016 #37
totodeinhere Jun 2016 #42
mopinko Jun 2016 #45
TexasBushwhacker Jun 2016 #47
snot Jun 2016 #52
bvar22 Jun 2016 #48
Pharaoh Jun 2016 #49
Post removed Jun 2016 #53
Post removed Jun 2016 #55
TxVietVet Jun 2016 #54
Pharaoh Jun 2016 #56
mopinko Jun 2016 #58
Bob41213 Jun 2016 #59
Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2016 #63
Hell Hath No Fury Jun 2016 #64

Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:30 PM

1. Drip drip

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:33 PM

2. I can't wait until June 16!

Then Assange will no longer be able to publish those e-mails.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RufusTFirefly (Reply #2)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:51 PM

6. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RufusTFirefly (Reply #2)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 08:11 PM

13. LOL!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RufusTFirefly (Reply #2)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 08:37 PM

15. !!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RufusTFirefly (Reply #2)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 10:53 PM

19. ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RufusTFirefly (Reply #2)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:02 PM

20. Snort

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RufusTFirefly (Reply #2)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:24 PM

21. Lol! June 16?!

What, DU shuts Wiki leaks down with Bernie then?!

Too much!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RufusTFirefly (Reply #2)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:27 AM

24. ROFL. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RufusTFirefly (Reply #2)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:35 AM

27. Brilliant. Very well done.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RufusTFirefly (Reply #2)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 11:51 AM

38. ...

 



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RufusTFirefly (Reply #2)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 02:32 PM

44. Post of the year!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RufusTFirefly (Reply #2)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 08:42 PM

57. Funny!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:35 PM

3. I guess we need to be prepared.

 

So, these new ones are in addition to the others the FBI has. I am having a hard time wrapping my head around all of this information. Why on earth didn't it come out sooner?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Duval (Reply #3)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:37 PM

4. I imagine there is mega amounts of data to go through so they didn't want to release prematurely...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Reply #4)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:51 PM

7. Sounds right.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Duval (Reply #3)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 08:11 PM

12. Could it be these are incriminating emails Hillary deleted from her server when she had it wiped it clean?

In any case, to be fair, I think we should withhold judgment until the facts come out. I know Bernie is doing just that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to InAbLuEsTaTe (Reply #12)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 08:39 PM

16. Wiped?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pokerfan (Reply #16)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:28 AM

25. A phrase that will live in infamy. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Live and Learn (Reply #25)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:46 AM

30. More inanity than infamy n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scootaloo (Reply #30)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 01:17 AM

31. True. Thanks for the correction. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Live and Learn (Reply #31)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 02:49 AM

32. In the dictionary...

... next to the entry for disingenuous.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pokerfan (Reply #16)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 02:20 PM

43. I find it interesting that when she said that...

she was wearing orange.

At least we know the color suits her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Duval (Reply #3)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:39 AM

28. Uh, Julian, it's a little late to pull that rabbit of your hat, and it's a bit of bad timing

 

it's not going to make a wit of difference, no matter what content is released.

FBI is on Orlando now, and no they can't walk and chew gum at the same time, very well it seems.

They can't bring down their own, HRC is in their camp, and you know the whole Terrorists on the Motherland promises to reap major funding, Clinton is their guy.

Julian, it's too little, too late, shoulda done it a long time ago.

And betcha the media will give nary a mention or it will be fairly convoluted at best.




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 2banon (Reply #28)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 06:56 AM

34. We really have til July 25

The earlier, the better.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SmittynMo (Reply #34)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:47 PM

39. Fair Point..

 



just feeling a bit like, why not 6 months ago? Right?

I just don't get why now..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 2banon (Reply #39)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 04:54 PM

46. Rumor has it these are hacked emails being leaked by Russia...

 

via Wikileaks, he probably didn't have them until now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MinnesotaRob (Reply #46)

Wed Jun 15, 2016, 11:15 PM

60. ohhh.. I sort of missed the broohaha but caught up on it

 

a couple of days ago.. hmm

so is he going to release that. and wait.. it's just campaign insider chat right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 2banon (Reply #60)


Response to Name removed (Reply #61)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 01:33 AM

62. Interesting, but..

 


"enough evidence to indict Hillary Clinton" yet to come.


I don't mean to be cynical, I guess I've seen too much in my time wrt corruption and corrupted officials in high office who were able to completely skirt any serious consequences, nothing at all since Watergate really. Bill Clinton was in deep muddy for a bit and it hurt him to a degree. but golly gee here he is again all the richer for it, apparently.

It seems the only people the Feds seem to be willing to go after are those in lower offices, whether it's Congress Critters, which happens frequently enough, but never in a timely manner. Hastert comes to mind.

Serious stuff in the pike regarding San Francisco's Mayor connected to Chinatown underworld, Feds took down a Dem candidate running for State Senate in connection to this "ongoing" investigation involving other unnamed officials.

But I have no expectation Hillary will be indicted or face any kind of charges as result of wikileaks content. Keep in mind, the Feds don't want Trump in office either.

I would be really, really, really shocked if she faced anything of serious consequences as a result from what ever Wikileaks is "about to release".

It seems I came across a headline a day or two ago, "The Feds have no expectation to bring charges to HRC" . something like that?

Again, I would actually be shocked if they do.

But hey, I guess it is possible.









Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:47 PM

5. For some reason I don't think she will be indicted by the Obama Administration.

There will be lots of yelling but not much action.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jalan48 (Reply #5)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:52 PM

8. The Thirdway sticks up for each other.

and Obama will totally go to bat for Hillary. Guaranteed.

Ugh...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Phlem (Reply #8)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 09:12 PM

17. Official Logo of the 3rd Güey Party

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Xipe Totec (Reply #17)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 07:58 PM

51. Nice.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jalan48 (Reply #5)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:54 PM

9. likely you are right

 

they own this place as Carlin told us.

How do we put them on the ropes?

If not a knock out punch I hope it knocks her down.........

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Reply #9)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 08:03 PM

11. More likely years of hearings by the Republicans.

Sometimes I wonder if it isn't all a big distraction to keep Americans from thinking about the real issues that affect them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jalan48 (Reply #5)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 08:01 AM

35. Probably not even yelling.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jalan48 (Reply #5)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 01:16 PM

40. It won't necessarily take an indictment per se to knock her out of the race.

If Wikileaks publishes enough damning information that can be verified then that might be enough indictment or not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:56 PM

10. Now that this is on the greatest page

 

how long till they take this down?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 08:15 PM

14. I fear our news media won't pick it up, or it will fall way of Panama Papers.

US people have attention spans of squirrels. Something shiny comes along and they are scampering after that instead.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jackilope (Reply #14)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:30 PM

22. Fear? Chuckle ...

couldn't help myself. You are diplomatic Jack ... haha, more like know, no?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KPN (Reply #22)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:36 PM

23. Yeah .... Know is more likely. :-(

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 09:44 PM

18. If it's true,

then a whole lot of shit is about to begin. We'll see. If he's got it, NOW is the time. It's probably all bullshit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:34 AM

26. Or to get a lot of donations for nothing

Releaase it or don't. Seem like they want money not truth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:41 AM

29. I'm waiting for someone to come forward with full backups of her server.

That should burn her goose to a crisp.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 06:13 AM

33. I read this morning that if Putin releases, it will be soon and through another party such as wiki

 

I'm tending to believe this simply because I think proof that Russia had hacked is one of the few things left that is worse than what we already know about the private server and emails.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 08:05 AM

36. Memories, sweet memories suggest similarities to Fitzmas

with the part of Jason Leopold now being played by Julian Assange.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HereSince1628 (Reply #36)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 07:44 PM

50. I hope you are wrong

But I fear you are correct.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:05 AM

37. I'll believe it if it happens.

I don't think that anything will derail 'Dear Leader' with her supporters anyway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to blackspade (Reply #37)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 01:19 PM

42. Not with her dedicated supporters. But she will need more than just them to get elected

in November.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 04:52 PM

45. why didnt he publish them when it meant something?

i am getting a bit tired of hear the gonna, gonna, gonna from wikileaks, assange and anonymous.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mopinko (Reply #45)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:08 PM

47. +1 n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mopinko (Reply #45)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 08:00 PM

52. I'm a fan of Assange; but sure wish they'd come out in time to help Bernie.

But Putin probably doesn't want to deal with Bernie any more than any of the other oligarchs do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:25 PM

48. "Assange said the whistleblowing website will soon be leaking documents .....

....that will provide “enough evidence” for the Department of Justice to indict the presumptive Democratic nominee."

Just because our Justice Department has enough information to indict......doesn't mean they WILL indict.

John Edwards was correct about "The Two Americas"...one for the RICH,
and one for all the rest of us.
Hillary is a member of that special class to which the rules do not apply.
She will be protected.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bvar22 (Reply #48)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:56 PM

49. she will be protected

 

But she may be too toxic to get the nomination,

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)


Response to Post removed (Reply #53)


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 08:10 PM

54. This reminds me of when Bill Clinton was the President.

Every Friday Druggie Limbaugh would say that he had information from and EXTREMELY RELIABLE SOURCE in the Justice Department that Hillary would be indicted over her ILLEGAL activities at the Rose Law firm.

Hell, I'm still waiting for those indictments.

I believe it's all just more conservanazi bu$hit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TxVietVet (Reply #54)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 08:23 PM

56. Yes I'd rather have a candidate who is not

 

Pro Fracking

Pro Keystone

Pro TPP

A wall street whore

and a warmonger

And By the way, This is the Bernie Sanders group, are you lost?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:01 PM

58. and ftr, i dont think this is the kind of thing that should be admissible

unless it can be independently verified.
would you want "evidence" from anonymous people on the internet admitted to a court case of yours?
i sure wouldnt. i doubt a court would allow it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mopinko (Reply #58)

Wed Jun 15, 2016, 01:12 AM

59. At the rate the FBI/DOJ is going

The court of public opinion might be the best place to convict her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pharaoh (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 09:38 PM

63. I wouldn't hold your breath

I doubt the AG will do anything. It looks like DOJ's hands are tied and the media will do their best to ignore it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #63)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 10:16 PM

64. Julian may be mistaken is his assessment --

 

of what qualifies as "campaign killing". He comes from a country where they actually may give a shit about ethics/transparency/etc., unlike the US.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread