WikiLeaks Is About to Ruin Hillary Clinton’s Chances of Becoming President

[Pharaoh]

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hillary Clinton.

In a recent interview with ITV, Assange said the whistleblowing website will soon be leaking documents that will provide “enough evidence” for the Department of Justice to indict the presumptive Democratic nominee. WikiLeaks has already published 30,322 emails from Clinton’s private email server, spanning from June 30, 2010 to August 12, 2014. While Assange didn’t specify what exactly was in the emails, he did tell ITV that WikiLeaks had “accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton, which could proceed to an indictment.”

http://usuncut.com/politics/wikileaks-could-ruin-hillary-clinton/

video at link..........

[Ned_Devine]

1. Drip drip

[RufusTFirefly]

2. I can't wait until June 16!

Then Assange will no longer be able to publish those e-mails.

[Phlem]

6. +1

[Jackilope]

13. LOL!

[hopemountain]

15. !!!

[mindwalker_i]

19. ...

[MissDeeds]

20. Snort

[KPN]

21. Lol! June 16?!

What, DU shuts Wiki leaks down with Bernie then?!

Too much!

[Live and Learn]

24. ROFL. nt

[JonLeibowitz]

27. Brilliant. Very well done.

[Dawgs]

38. ...

[Bob41213]

44. Post of the year!

[kayakjohnny]

57. Funny!

[Duval]

3. I guess we need to be prepared.

So, these new ones are in addition to the others the FBI has. I am having a hard time wrapping my head around all of this information. Why on earth didn't it come out sooner?

[Pharaoh]

4. I imagine there is mega amounts of data to go through so they didn't want to release prematurely...

[Duval]

7. Sounds right.

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

12. Could it be these are incriminating emails Hillary deleted from her server when she had it wiped it clean?

In any case, to be fair, I think we should withhold judgment until the facts come out. I know Bernie is doing just that.

[pokerfan]

16. Wiped?

[Live and Learn]

25. A phrase that will live in infamy. nt

[Scootaloo]

30. More inanity than infamy n/t

[Live and Learn]

31. True. Thanks for the correction. nt

[pokerfan]

32. In the dictionary...

... next to the entry for disingenuous.

[dorkzilla]

43. I find it interesting that when she said that...

she was wearing orange.

At least we know the color suits her.

[2banon]

28. Uh, Julian, it's a little late to pull that rabbit of your hat, and it's a bit of bad timing

it's not going to make a wit of difference, no matter what content is released.

FBI is on Orlando now, and no they can't walk and chew gum at the same time, very well it seems.

They can't bring down their own, HRC is in their camp, and you know the whole Terrorists on the Motherland promises to reap major funding, Clinton is their guy.

Julian, it's too little, too late, shoulda done it a long time ago.

And betcha the media will give nary a mention or it will be fairly convoluted at best.

[SmittynMo]

34. We really have til July 25

The earlier, the better.

[2banon]

39. Fair Point..

just feeling a bit like, why not 6 months ago? Right?

I just don't get why now..

[MinnesotaRob]

46. Rumor has it these are hacked emails being leaked by Russia...

via Wikileaks, he probably didn't have them until now.

[2banon]

60. ohhh.. I sort of missed the broohaha but caught up on it

a couple of days ago.. hmm

so is he going to release that. and wait.. it's just campaign insider chat right?

[2banon]

62. Interesting, but..

"enough evidence to indict Hillary Clinton" yet to come.

I don't mean to be cynical, I guess I've seen too much in my time wrt corruption and corrupted officials in high office who were able to completely skirt any serious consequences, nothing at all since Watergate really. Bill Clinton was in deep muddy for a bit and it hurt him to a degree. but golly gee here he is again all the richer for it, apparently.

It seems the only people the Feds seem to be willing to go after are those in lower offices, whether it's Congress Critters, which happens frequently enough, but never in a timely manner. Hastert comes to mind.

Serious stuff in the pike regarding San Francisco's Mayor connected to Chinatown underworld, Feds took down a Dem candidate running for State Senate in connection to this "ongoing" investigation involving other unnamed officials.

But I have no expectation Hillary will be indicted or face any kind of charges as result of wikileaks content. Keep in mind, the Feds don't want Trump in office either.

I would be really, really, really shocked if she faced anything of serious consequences as a result from what ever Wikileaks is "about to release".

It seems I came across a headline a day or two ago, "The Feds have no expectation to bring charges to HRC" . something like that?

Again, I would actually be shocked if they do.

But hey, I guess it is possible.

[jalan48]

5. For some reason I don't think she will be indicted by the Obama Administration.

There will be lots of yelling but not much action.

[Phlem]

8. The Thirdway sticks up for each other.

and Obama will totally go to bat for Hillary. Guaranteed.

Ugh...

[Xipe Totec]

17. Official Logo of the 3rd Güey Party

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=guey

[snot]

51. Nice.

[Pharaoh]

9. likely you are right

they own this place as Carlin told us.

How do we put them on the ropes?

If not a knock out punch I hope it knocks her down.........

[jalan48]

11. More likely years of hearings by the Republicans.

Sometimes I wonder if it isn't all a big distraction to keep Americans from thinking about the real issues that affect them.

[GreenPartyVoter]

35. Probably not even yelling.

[totodeinhere]

40. It won't necessarily take an indictment per se to knock her out of the race.

If Wikileaks publishes enough damning information that can be verified then that might be enough indictment or not.

[Pharaoh]

10. Now that this is on the greatest page

how long till they take this down?

[Jackilope]

14. I fear our news media won't pick it up, or it will fall way of Panama Papers.

US people have attention spans of squirrels. Something shiny comes along and they are scampering after that instead.

[KPN]

22. Fear? Chuckle ...

couldn't help myself. You are diplomatic Jack ... haha, more like know, no?

[Jackilope]

23. Yeah .... Know is more likely. :-(

[totodeinhere]

41. It has already hit the corporate media.

http://time.com/4365858/wikileaks-publish-hillary-clinton-emails-assange/

[SmittynMo]

18. If it's true,

then a whole lot of shit is about to begin. We'll see. If he's got it, NOW is the time. It's probably all bullshit.

[alc]

26. Or to get a lot of donations for nothing

Releaase it or don't. Seem like they want money not truth.

[-none]

29. I'm waiting for someone to come forward with full backups of her server.

That should burn her goose to a crisp.

[magical thyme]

33. I read this morning that if Putin releases, it will be soon and through another party such as wiki

I'm tending to believe this simply because I think proof that Russia had hacked is one of the few things left that is worse than what we already know about the private server and emails.

[HereSince1628]

36. Memories, sweet memories suggest similarities to Fitzmas

with the part of Jason Leopold now being played by Julian Assange.

[Pastiche423]

50. I hope you are wrong

But I fear you are correct.

[blackspade]

37. I'll believe it if it happens.

I don't think that anything will derail 'Dear Leader' with her supporters anyway.

[totodeinhere]

42. Not with her dedicated supporters. But she will need more than just them to get elected

in November.

[mopinko]

45. why didnt he publish them when it meant something?

i am getting a bit tired of hear the gonna, gonna, gonna from wikileaks, assange and anonymous.

[TexasBushwhacker]

47. +1 n/t

[snot]

52. I'm a fan of Assange; but sure wish they'd come out in time to help Bernie.

But Putin probably doesn't want to deal with Bernie any more than any of the other oligarchs do.

[bvar22]

48. "Assange said the whistleblowing website will soon be leaking documents .....

....that will provide “enough evidence” for the Department of Justice to indict the presumptive Democratic nominee."

Just because our Justice Department has enough information to indict......doesn't mean they WILL indict.

John Edwards was correct about "The Two Americas"...one for the RICH,
and one for all the rest of us.
Hillary is a member of that special class to which the rules do not apply.
She will be protected.

[Pharaoh]

49. she will be protected

But she may be too toxic to get the nomination,

[TxVietVet]

54. This reminds me of when Bill Clinton was the President.

Every Friday Druggie Limbaugh would say that he had information from and EXTREMELY RELIABLE SOURCE in the Justice Department that Hillary would be indicted over her ILLEGAL activities at the Rose Law firm.

Hell, I'm still waiting for those indictments.

I believe it's all just more conservanazi bu$hit.

[Pharaoh]

56. Yes I'd rather have a candidate who is not

Pro Fracking

Pro Keystone

Pro TPP

A wall street whore

and a warmonger

And By the way, This is the Bernie Sanders group, are you lost?

[mopinko]

58. and ftr, i dont think this is the kind of thing that should be admissible

unless it can be independently verified.
would you want "evidence" from anonymous people on the internet admitted to a court case of yours?
i sure wouldnt. i doubt a court would allow it.

[Bob41213]

59. At the rate the FBI/DOJ is going

The court of public opinion might be the best place to convict her.

[Rosa Luxemburg]

63. I wouldn't hold your breath

I doubt the AG will do anything. It looks like DOJ's hands are tied and the media will do their best to ignore it.

[Hell Hath No Fury]

64. Julian may be mistaken is his assessment --

of what qualifies as "campaign killing". He comes from a country where they actually may give a shit about ethics/transparency/etc., unlike the US.