Bernie Sanders

appalachiablue

(41,102 posts) Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:19 PM Jun 2016

Now, DWS on MSNBC: Re DNC Server Hack..'Network is now clean and secure'.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Now, DWS on MSNBC: Re DNC Server Hack..'Network is now clean and secure'. (Original Post) appalachiablue Jun 2016 OP

with a cloth? think Jun 2016 #1

Yeah, that's what makes it secure. SmittynMo Jun 2016 #2

One wants to make sure it's nice and clean. Just don't wipe the hard drive. You'll lose your data.. think Jun 2016 #4

That's it, move along, nothing to see here. Oh, Chuck just asked her if she was appalachiablue Jun 2016 #6

So it wasn't secure all this time? jillan Jun 2016 #3

I dont' want to know either SmittynMo Jun 2016 #8

THe hack is just cover for the leak Lance Bass esquire Jun 2016 #5

Why would they need to pretend their own data was hacked? arcane1 Jun 2016 #7

Because Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #10

Everytime the press talks about this story Lance Bass esquire Jun 2016 #11

I don't think that DWS knows the least bit RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #9

She was "told" it was "clean and secure" by AVG Free... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #12

Nah, more like John McAffee! n/t RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #13

Even worse! Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #14

Been busy today, guess I missed this story, but I get the gist reading through the threads 2banon Jun 2016 #15

It is a cover for someone foreign to release info from HRCs private server. LiberalArkie Jun 2016 #16

Just saw on Hardball only Trump Monkey's file was taken Lance Bass esquire Jun 2016 #17

There were 2 breaches. One of the hacker groups had already been in there an entire freaking YEAR! nc4bo Jun 2016 #18

think

(11,641 posts)

1. with a cloth?

Reply to appalachiablue (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:21 PM

Jun 2016

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)

2. Yeah, that's what makes it secure.

Reply to think (Reply #1)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:23 PM

Jun 2016

LOL. Just ask her.

think

(11,641 posts)

4. One wants to make sure it's nice and clean. Just don't wipe the hard drive. You'll lose your data..

Reply to SmittynMo (Reply #2)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:27 PM

Jun 2016

appalachiablue

(41,102 posts)

6. That's it, move along, nothing to see here. Oh, Chuck just asked her if she was

Reply to think (Reply #1)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:29 PM

Jun 2016

staying as DNC Chair until Nov.? 'Yes'. Chuck: 'Would it be easier for you to run for your seat if not Chair?', DWS: gobblegook..

Chuck: 'Your position is not a bargaining chip for Bernie Sanders?' DWS: gobblegook.

jillan

(39,451 posts)

3. So it wasn't secure all this time?

Reply to appalachiablue (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:26 PM

Jun 2016

I don't even want to know.

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)

8. I dont' want to know either

Reply to jillan (Reply #3)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:36 PM

Jun 2016

but you are correct. It's been unsecure for quite a while. I'm guessing years. Who the hell is behind the wheel for the DNC? DWS, right? It's time to nuke DWS. And it's not like she doesn't have it coming. She's consistently been a failure for years.

Lance Bass esquire

(671 posts)

5. THe hack is just cover for the leak

Reply to appalachiablue (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:28 PM

Jun 2016

Of Trumps info...old school diversion.
Politics 101.

Watch all the stuff that comes out about Trump Monkey's business and personal life in the next few days.

Seen this movie before.

arcane1

(38,613 posts)

7. Why would they need to pretend their own data was hacked?

Reply to Lance Bass esquire (Reply #5)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:31 PM

Jun 2016

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)

10. Because

Reply to arcane1 (Reply #7)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:38 PM

Jun 2016

Then the really brutal attacks/ info can be 'leaked' from anonymous third parties and Hillary/DNC can keep their hands clean and Trump can't accuse Hillary of being unfair to him like at the Fox Debates.

Lance Bass esquire

(671 posts)

11. Everytime the press talks about this story

Reply to arcane1 (Reply #7)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:39 PM

Jun 2016

It's not that the dems got hacked it's that they got hacked and TRUMPS backround info got taken.

Thats the story.

Keep watching the big picture will come into focus soon enuff.

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)

9. I don't think that DWS knows the least bit

Reply to appalachiablue (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:37 PM

Jun 2016

about how to make a server "clean and secure."
Just my two cents, after being in the IT field for more than 25 years.

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)

12. She was "told" it was "clean and secure" by AVG Free...

Reply to RoccoR5955 (Reply #9)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:44 PM

Jun 2016

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)

13. Nah, more like John McAffee! n/t

Reply to Cooley Hurd (Reply #12)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:47 PM

Jun 2016

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)

14. Even worse!

Reply to RoccoR5955 (Reply #13)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:52 PM

Jun 2016

2banon

(7,321 posts)

15. Been busy today, guess I missed this story, but I get the gist reading through the threads

Reply to appalachiablue (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 06:20 PM

Jun 2016

Can I just say? ....

:

LiberalArkie

(15,703 posts)

16. It is a cover for someone foreign to release info from HRCs private server.

Reply to appalachiablue (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 06:26 PM

Jun 2016

That way Clinton can say that the information leaked really came from the DNC not her.

Lance Bass esquire

(671 posts)

17. Just saw on Hardball only Trump Monkey's file was taken

Reply to appalachiablue (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 07:51 PM

Jun 2016

Some DNC chat logs and minor stuff looked at but they were only after trumps file.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)

18. There were 2 breaches. One of the hacker groups had already been in there an entire freaking YEAR!

Reply to Lance Bass esquire (Reply #17)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 07:57 PM

Jun 2016

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/15/us/politics/russian-hackers-dnc-trump.html?_r=0

I assure you, Trumpy wasn't the end all be all, it's just the biggest shiny object to take attention away from the hundreds of smaller ones.

Reply to this discussion