New Stanford Study Suggests Election FRAUD

[Segami]

Lee Camp ?@LeeCamp

New Stanford study suggests election fraud -

#BernieSanders #BernieOrBust





added on edit:

Conclusion:

Have we witnessed a dishonest election? Our first analysis showed that states wherein the voting outcomes are difficult to verify show far greater support for Secretary Clinton. Second, our examination of exit polling suggested large differences between the respondents that took the exit polls and the claimed voters in the final tally. Beyond these points, these irregular patterns of results did not exist in 2008. As such, as a whole, these data suggest that election fraud is occurring in the 2016 Democratic Party Presidential Primary election. This fraud has overwhelmingly benefited Secretary Clinton at the expense of Senator Sanders.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6mLpCEIGEYGSlRsV0IxV1ByXzQ/view?pref=2&pli=1

[floriduck]

1. Thanks Segami. Redacted Tonight is one of my regular shows watched.

[All in it together]

2. We have to have clean transparent democratic voting with paper trails

And exit polling to help make the elections fair and trusted. Otherwise we don't have legitimate elections and government.

[Segami]

3. The Clintons or Bushes..

..would never stand a chance within a fair electoral environment.

[senz]

4. +1000

[MissDeeds]

5. Yep

[840high]

9. .+1

[stillwaiting]

6. It is obvious and absurd. We must make lots of noise.

So many states.

The situation in MA is unbelievable.

[Segami]

7. “…Given that Secretary Clinton lost to President Obama in 2008,..

....their data is a natural control and the best possible point of comparison for the 2016 data. Thus, as we did for 2016, we tabulated the percentage of delegates won in each state by (then Senator) Hillary Clinton. The data show that, contrary to 2016 data, there is no evidence that primary states without paper trails favored Senator Clinton in 2008, P = 0.38. As such, the patterns of 2016 are different from their best point of comparison….”

....

[Melissa G]

8. Been watching this Election show a while..

[Stevepol]

10. This is not just true in this year's Dem primary

IT IS OVERWHELMINGLY TRUE OF ELECTIONS ALL OVER THE COUNTRY.

Exit polls, pre-election polls, all show the vote is being tilted red by the electronic voting machines.

This is the reason the Dems were denied a landslide in one election cycle. It's the reason the Repubs DID have a landslide in the last mid-term elections. It's the reason the Repubs have no fear in suppressing the vote further and further and lying about it over and over (they can't be held accountable for anything). It's the reason that these tea party nuts started winning around the country and especially at the local level. It's the reason that we have the SC we have, etc. etc. etc. etc.

Until we have fair elections again, we will not see any improvement.

IF THE VOTE IS COUNTED IN TOTAL SECRECY WITHOUT VERIFICATION, YOU CAN'T HAVE A DEMOCRACY.

The solution is very simple. There has to be a paper trail in every election, AND THERE HAS TO BE AN AUDIT OF AT LEAST 5% FOR EVERY ELECTION AND RULES TO REQUIRE A COMPLETE RECOUNT WHEN THE AUDIT SHOWS CRIMINALITY.

[sangfroid]

11. I follow DU closely

And I note that the Hillside have already attempted to defuse complaints about voting irregularities by declaring them all "conspiracy theories." It's gotten to the point where you"ll need a video of Hill actually handing cash to an election official before people start thinking critically.