Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumWall Street Donors Seek To BLOCK Warren VP Pick
NEW YORK Big Wall Street donors have a message for Hillary Clinton: Keep Elizabeth Warren off the ticket or risk losing millions of dollars in contributions. In a dozen interviews, major Democratic donors in the financial services industry said they saw little chance that Clinton would pick the liberal firebrand as her vice presidential nominee. These donors despise Warrens attacks on the financial industry. But they also think her selection would be damaging to the economy. And they warned that if Clinton surprises them and taps Warren, big donations from the industry could vanish.
Most big donors dont want Warren on the ticket because she is the most accomplished anti-Wall Street populist in the Democratic Party. But many also think her presence would drive a potential Clinton administration too far to the left, poison relations with the private sector from the start and ultimately be damaging to the economy. A constant theme that emerged in the interviews is that executives in the financial industry believe the first 100 days of a Clinton administration could feature potential deal making with Republicans, who are likely to maintain their majority in the House of Representatives. The dream deal for Wall Street would be a combination of targeted infrastructure spending that appeals mostly to Democrats and corporate and international tax reform that could bring Republicans along. The fear is that Warren would make such a deal more difficult.
All of the donors and senior Democrats interviewed for this story demanded that their names not be used both because they were not authorized to speak about the Clinton campaigns internal deliberations and because they feared Warrens wrath. There is no upside to my talking to you on the record, one big donor said. Either I piss off the Clinton campaign or I piss off Warren, or both. Several donors said they did not really fear Warren going on the ticket because they do not believe Clinton has a strong relationship with the senator and would not trust Warren to be a loyal No. 2, either on the campaign or in the White House.
-snip-
cont'
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/elizabeth-warren-wall-street-vice-president-224489
Faux pas
(14,679 posts)wall street rules again.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)1monster
(11,012 posts)would just let them huff and puff and huff and puff and huff and puff and try to blow his brick house down...
It might even be entertaining to watch.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)1monster
(11,012 posts)Bernie raised more than enough money to compete with Hillary and matched her nearly dollar for dollar in fundraising
WITHOUT huge corporate help and $2700 a plate fundraising dinners.
What he did is incredibly impressive, especially if you consider that Hillary has been preparing to become President since 2000 when she decided to run for the Senate and Bernie only made up his mind to run in February or March of 2015.
So yes, if the Democratic Party had been prescience enough to nominate him, I believe he would have had no problem raising the necessary funds to defeat Donald Trump. Trump is practically doing that himself, anyway.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)has done a great job in the primaries but he would have to do a hundred times better in the general election. come on man be honest and quit ignoring the facts of were we are in this country. it's frustrating when people will not admit the obvious, it will take a ton of money for bernie to compete against anyone, trump, cruz, romney, that's just the way it is for now.
1monster
(11,012 posts)okieinpain
(9,397 posts)w4rma
(31,700 posts)I think that it would be the epitome of a bad decision for Hillary to bend the knee to these blackmailers.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)raise a billion dollars from $27 dollar donations.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)And Sanders beats Trump by double digits in every national poll and in every swing state.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)w4rma
(31,700 posts)entire campaign. It's not even close. Heck, Bernie STILL has more staff than Trump does, by at least, an order of magnitude. Not only that, but Bernie has out fund raised Clinton every single month of this year.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)the money needed without big donors. the republicans have already shown you they don't care what they run with, when the time comes the money will pour in. why because what's a billion dollars to a group of people that are worth a trillion. i don't care if it's hillary or bernie, but I realize that some things aren't going to change. the sun comes up in the east and the 1% are not going to be taken down because bernie says so, for that to happen you better prep up on your gun and bomb making skills.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)okieinpain
(9,397 posts)that the primaries are over, we are in the general now and the money is going to come into play now.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)okieinpain
(9,397 posts)money out of bird droppings, what was i thinking.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)Nor would his fundraising drop, if he were the nominee.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)peddle your devicive crap elsewhere.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)....shocking I tell you, it's simply shocking!
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)That says a lot!
I guess that they DO own the Democratic party.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,692 posts)Vice presidents don't have much power; senators do.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,692 posts)than what that particular choice might signify.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)Along with getting executive experience to actually run for the office, later.
TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)That firm hand on the reigns can be re-established.
Looking forward to the schadenfreude clusterfuck.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)aren't trying to influence or expect anything in return for their donations......
senz
(11,945 posts)Furthermore, Wall St. knows perfectly well that VP is a powerless position.
Something fishy here, sorry.
Segami
(14,923 posts)than Clinton Theater?
HubertHeaver
(2,522 posts)a successful impeachment and removal from office. Of course they would want to pick the vice-p,
senz
(11,945 posts)I still have questions about the public nature of this. If Hill now nixes EW, it will look like she's in Wall Street's pocket, will it not? She doesn't want that.
Still something missing here.
Segami
(14,923 posts)many with the impression that Hillary is in Wall Street's pocket......Politico and progressives will go to town on Hillary if she comes in with another V.P. pick other than EW.......
You may be right,.....something doesn't smell quite right.....
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I haven't seen evidence of that and would like to read it.
HubertHeaver
(2,522 posts)As always, it is multi-layered. It is a "shot across the bow", we just aren't sure who fired it.
senz
(11,945 posts)TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)...to temporarily distance the campaign from WS in an attempt to appeal to Bernie democrats...until after the election.
TYY
Phlem
(6,323 posts)The VP position is a muzzle.
We have to celebrate the fuckups that help us too.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Clinton would never choose Sen Warren and Wall Street knows it.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)The money class has thoroughly corrupted our political system.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)I don't think Clinton would accept or need a "Cheney" VP (by Cheney, I mean running the show from behind the scenes).
Other than Cheney's reign, VP is largely a ceremonial/spokesperson position. I'd much rather see Warren in a position to ride herd on Wall St.