Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumNo, Sanders’ Secret Service Detail Isn’t Costing ‘Taxpayers’ $38,000 a Day

Washington Post political reporter John Wagner (6/19/16) reported on Bernie Sanders continuing Secret Service detail, throwing in a too-clever-by-half talking point that has since gone viral. In An Expensive Reminder That Sanders Still Hasnt Dropped Out: His Secret Service Detail, Wagner used an eight-year-old stat to provide urgency to his general thesis that Sanders quixotic campaign is draining us, the good American taxpayer, of resources:
Such round-the-clock protection can cost taxpayers more than $38,000 a day.
Over the next 48 hours, this tidbit quickly spread across several outlets, providing a good clickbait-friendly fable of Sanders egoism run expensively amok:
Snip
http://fair.org/home/no-sanders-secret-service-detail-isnt-costing-taxpayers-38000-a-day/
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No, Sanders’ Secret Service Detail Isn’t Costing ‘Taxpayers’ $38,000 a Day (Original Post)
Winston.Smith
Jun 2016
OP
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)1. And this right-wing talking point, as it is so clearly
analyzed and categorized in this article, was still being regurgitated here after the switch-over.
roody
(10,849 posts)2. So what if it were. Money well spent.
djean111
(14,255 posts)3. This says it all....
The framing ignores this and uses a Grover Norquistlike gimmick of isolating one-off costs as something being taken away from the taxpayera term with considerable right-wing baggage and whose uniform adoption here by journalists belies their ostensibly neutral motives
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)4. Money. Well. Spent.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)5. Oh no!
Even if it is $38,000 a day, that is couch cushion change compared to all the tax moneys the federal government wastes on programs and tax breaks that aren't aimed at protect the lives of politicians.
Honestly, I don't care if that much is spent to protect any public presidential candidate -- be it Democrat or Republican -- from being
assassinated.
It is amazing how some people forget that presidential candidates have been assassinated.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)6. The very looniest of those who would angst
about such Secret Service costs are the very ones that make such costs necessary.