Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Winston.Smith

(32 posts)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 06:45 AM Jun 2016

No, Sanders’ Secret Service Detail Isn’t Costing ‘Taxpayers’ $38,000 a Day



Washington Post political reporter John Wagner (6/19/16) reported on Bernie Sanders’ continuing Secret Service detail, throwing in a too-clever-by-half talking point that has since gone viral. In “An Expensive Reminder That Sanders Still Hasn’t Dropped Out: His Secret Service Detail,” Wagner used an eight-year-old stat to provide urgency to his general thesis that Sanders’ quixotic campaign is draining us, the good American “taxpayer,” of resources:

Such round-the-clock protection can cost taxpayers more than $38,000 a day.

Over the next 48 hours, this tidbit quickly spread across several outlets, providing a good clickbait-friendly fable of Sanders’ egoism run expensively amok:

Snip

http://fair.org/home/no-sanders-secret-service-detail-isnt-costing-taxpayers-38000-a-day/
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No, Sanders’ Secret Service Detail Isn’t Costing ‘Taxpayers’ $38,000 a Day (Original Post) Winston.Smith Jun 2016 OP
And this right-wing talking point, as it is so clearly Warren Stupidity Jun 2016 #1
So what if it were. Money well spent. roody Jun 2016 #2
This says it all.... djean111 Jun 2016 #3
Money. Well. Spent. Hiraeth Jun 2016 #4
Oh no! Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #5
The very looniest of those who would angst Plucketeer Jun 2016 #6
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
1. And this right-wing talking point, as it is so clearly
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 07:14 AM
Jun 2016

analyzed and categorized in this article, was still being regurgitated here after the switch-over.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
3. This says it all....
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 08:49 AM
Jun 2016
The framing ignores this and uses a Grover Norquist–like gimmick of isolating one-off costs as something being taken away from the “taxpayer”—a term with considerable right-wing baggage and whose uniform adoption here by journalists belies their ostensibly neutral motives

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)
5. Oh no!
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 09:26 AM
Jun 2016

Even if it is $38,000 a day, that is couch cushion change compared to all the tax moneys the federal government wastes on programs and tax breaks that aren't aimed at protect the lives of politicians.

Honestly, I don't care if that much is spent to protect any public presidential candidate -- be it Democrat or Republican -- from being
assassinated.

It is amazing how some people forget that presidential candidates have been assassinated.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
6. The very looniest of those who would angst
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 03:48 PM
Jun 2016

about such Secret Service costs are the very ones that make such costs necessary.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»No, Sanders’ Secret Servi...