Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 11:29 PM Nov 2015

It seems very odd and surprising that

the Hillary supporters are so intent on mischaracterizing Bernie Sanders' words and actions. Remember, these are the people who have the polls on their side and, at this time, the AA vote. It's like a higher ranking candidate hitting downward, which is considered by politicians to be a mistake.

Class and integrity are earned. They are no more an entitlement than what Hillary views the GE candidacy. But the arrogance and ignorance of some of her supporters denigrates what the presidency should be.

Hillary's votes and positions are further right than President Obama's. That is verifiable. Yet the Third Way, New Democrat mentality is to support Corporatists and further globalization. Letting Hillary slide into Bernie's positions on the issues does not, by any means, make them equals.

Bernie is and has been fighting for the same people that support Hillary. But Hillary, knowing she needed to get off centrist ground, moved left, JUST FOR THE POLLS SAKE. Yet her supporters seem incapable of connecting the dots. And they will be the ones who complain the loudest when she moves back to center-right. It is a very sad state of affairs for her defenders.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It seems very odd and surprising that (Original Post) floriduck Nov 2015 OP
"Camp Weathervane" is aptly named. Scuba Nov 2015 #1
Remember that kid on the playground Bernin4U Nov 2015 #2
Nothing odd about it Hydra Nov 2015 #3
Her internal polls must look awful. (nt) jeff47 Nov 2015 #4
Most likely Old Codger Nov 2015 #5
This SandersDem Nov 2015 #7
I'm sure they do. When you're way ahead in the polls, in_cog_ni_to Nov 2015 #9
Yes. She sees danger and cannot allow another 2008. senz Nov 2015 #14
She peaked too early. n/t Qutzupalotl Nov 2015 #18
No they won't complain. wilsonbooks Nov 2015 #6
Precisely. For the devoted, it's as powerful as a cult. senz Nov 2015 #15
I haven't heard them utter a word about Lincoln Chafee - TBF Nov 2015 #8
She is a practiced politician, that is to say, she is a chameleon; a practiced liar. Major Hogwash Nov 2015 #10
Not just played by the Dems Bernin4U Nov 2015 #11
You all make good points. floriduck Nov 2015 #12
I know what you mean. wendylaroux Nov 2015 #17
"footmen," really (perhaps "footwomyn," since they're the SJW type who says that someone who lost MisterP Nov 2015 #13
What amazes me is the O'Malley attack on Bernie. senz Nov 2015 #16

Bernin4U

(812 posts)
2. Remember that kid on the playground
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 12:20 AM
Nov 2015

Who would try to take a cheap shot at you, then as soon as you'd turn around, they'd be rolling on the ground and fake crying?

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
3. Nothing odd about it
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 12:27 AM
Nov 2015

They claim everything is fine, but they are shaking in their boots. I don't think they are worried about this primary(whether they should be or not), they are worried that the Third Way thing is not selling any more and that the Left will leave and start a new party...leaving them with about 10% of the vote they were once holding.

At that point, they become irrelevant, and all their money disappears.

We're at an interesting point. I'll be curious to see what happens over the next year.

 

Old Codger

(4,205 posts)
5. Most likely
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 01:07 AM
Nov 2015

seeing the same thing that happened last time around....Scares the shit out of them...

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
9. I'm sure they do. When you're way ahead in the polls,
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 11:43 AM
Nov 2015

no need to attack your opponent. Especially with bogus, idiotic things like sexism, racism or Bernie's anti-Obama (the meme Du Jour) which are all just laughable and make HER and her supporters look foolish.

Yeah, her internals are not looking good.

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
14. Yes. She sees danger and cannot allow another 2008.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 03:52 PM
Nov 2015

She (they) will stamp out anything that they think might stand between her and ultimate power.

(Aw gosh, she's so admirable.)

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
15. Precisely. For the devoted, it's as powerful as a cult.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 03:55 PM
Nov 2015

They don't care what she actually does. That is irrelevant.

TBF

(32,047 posts)
8. I haven't heard them utter a word about Lincoln Chafee -
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 10:52 AM
Nov 2015

he didn't scare them in the least.

Bernie, however, definitely has their attention. Two similar looking guys, both likely driving Volvos, and they are having very different reactions to them. Gee, I wonder why?

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
10. She is a practiced politician, that is to say, she is a chameleon; a practiced liar.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 11:43 AM
Nov 2015

She only moved to the left of center on some issues in the last 3 or 4 months in order to make an attempt to sway some people to vote for her, who otherwise would wind up voting for Bernie.

It's an old, rather obvious, silly political game most of the Democrats have played for the last 30 years -- talk and act as liberal as they can in order to garner as many of the votes from Democrats they can get in order to win the primaries -- and then walk back toward the center to appeal to some of the moderates in this country to attempt to win the General Election, hoping they won't lose the vote of the alienated Democrats that voted for them in the primaries, by constantly using the "lesser of two evils" argument.

Once the primaries are over, she intends to move back towards the center on many of these same issues, and maybe she will even go clear to the center right on some issues, in order for her to go head-to-head with whoever the Republican candidate will be in the General Election.

The problem is . . . and it is clear to anyone that has paid any attention to her voting record . . . she has never voted from the left.
Most of her votes were either mediocre, down the middle, centrist votes, or to the center right.

She didn't have much of a challenge in 2006 when she ran for re-election for the Senate, so she no longer needed to pretend to be liberal.
She just had to defend her mediocre, middle-of-the-road voting record against a foaming-at-the-mouth Republican.
She spent 6 times more money on the race than the Republican did in order to get re-elected, spending a little more than $33 million to keep her seat in the Senate.

That's a lot of money to spend for a Senate campaign, but she wanted to be in the Senate when she ran for President 2 years later in 2008.
Her plan was going along pretty good, that is, until Obama started his campaign for President just 3 months after getting in to the Senate in 2007.
It's just not in the stars for her to be the President of the United States.
She should have learned her lesson in 2008.

Bernin4U

(812 posts)
11. Not just played by the Dems
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 11:55 AM
Nov 2015

I remember Pat Buchanan mentioning it years ago, how in the primaries you run out to your base, then if you make it to the general you run as fast as you can to the center. He was talking about a repub at the time, but everybody on the McLaughlin panel knew it was old hat.

So both sides have been doing it for who knows how long. The question is, why does it still work? And just how "last minute" on an issue can someone's "evolving" be, before we have a problem with it?

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
12. You all make good points.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 01:59 PM
Nov 2015

At this time in my life (I'm a senior), I no longer feel like a democrat. They left me years ago and I mistakenly believed Barack Obama would right the ship. It only took a few months for me to recognize he was nothing close to the answer. He did some good things; better than a republican would have. But his pro-corporate cabinet and his trade agenda lost me. I live in Washington and both my lady senators voted to support the trade deal. So now I have no one in my district that represents my interests.

Maybe having a Republican president would screw up this country so badly, a real breed of liberals would gain a stronghold after the damage and dust settles. But I cannot vote for Hillary because I know what she will do to damage this country further. So I'm committed to Bernie, even as a write-in if he loses the primary.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
13. "footmen," really (perhaps "footwomyn," since they're the SJW type who says that someone who lost
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 03:48 PM
Nov 2015

half his family to Hitler is the *face of white privilege in the party*)

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
16. What amazes me is the O'Malley attack on Bernie.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 03:58 PM
Nov 2015

His supporters are going after Bernie like there's no Hillary in the race. The only sense I can make of it is that O'Malley hopes to be Hillary's VP.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»It seems very odd and sur...