Fri Sep 18, 2015, 12:08 PM
Raine1967 (11,563 posts)
MARTIN O'MALLEY ON THOM HARTMANN SHOW NOW!
|
7 replies, 1559 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Raine1967 | Sep 2015 | OP |
elleng | Sep 2015 | #1 | |
Raine1967 | Sep 2015 | #2 | |
elleng | Sep 2015 | #3 | |
Raine1967 | Sep 2015 | #4 | |
elleng | Sep 2015 | #5 | |
Koinos | Sep 2015 | #6 | |
elleng | Sep 2015 | #7 |
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 12:20 PM
elleng (122,786 posts)
1. Has he been on?
Thom just said he doesn't see any calls about Martin O'Malley.
|
Response to elleng (Reply #1)
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 12:21 PM
Raine1967 (11,563 posts)
2. First 15 minutes was part of the interview.
he will be airing the rest of it at the half hour mark.
(it is prerecorded) |
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 12:46 PM
Raine1967 (11,563 posts)
4. Thom is just way to in the bag for Sanders.
he really said that O'MAlley seemed too calculating and to polite?
|
Response to elleng (Reply #5)
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 08:04 AM
Koinos (2,789 posts)
6. It's all about in-your-face anger and "entertainment."
I happen to prefer polite. Polite is good. It reveals character.
What is wrong with this primary, if only the crazy and the angry get attention? And by "calculating," did he mean too thoughtful and not impulsive enough? We could use more thought. O'Malley's detailed plans are full of thought. Maybe after the "fever" breaks, people will take a hard look at the O'Malley. |
Response to Koinos (Reply #6)
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 01:42 PM
elleng (122,786 posts)
7. Right, Koinos.
I haven't followed Thom, do appreciate that many do, but was particularly disappointed about his quandary looking for the right term to use, and came up with 'calculating.' REALLY, what's wrong with THOUGHTFUL? Thought you, Thom, were supposed to be smart/intelligent; guess not, too 'calculating.'
I, too, prefer 'polite.' In fact, I demand it. HOPE the 'fever' breaks Oct. 13 (debate.) ![]() ![]() |