Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

question everything

(47,476 posts)
Wed May 1, 2019, 10:26 PM May 2019

Politicians Like To Talk About Infrastructure, But Klobuchar Is The Only 2020 Candidate With A Real

(snip)

There’s one other thing you should know about Klobuchar: She has an idea that could save you money, shorten your commute, help fight climate change, create well-paying jobs and redeem one of Donald Trump's broken promises. The Democratic presidential candidate has made spending $1 trillion on public works the off-the-blocks proposal of her campaign. It doesn’t have the sex appeal of Medicare for All, the New Green Deal or other talking points that goose squeals of delight from progressive crowds. Fixing our decrepit roads, bridges, power grid and water systems? Stolidly dull to many.

But unlike those flashier plans, this one’s eminently doable. Indeed, unlike Trump, Klobuchar has the details filled in, which means she can be believed when she marks this as her top budget priority should she win the White House. Her temperament is a legitimate concern in a potential president; her infrastructure plan is a legitimate credit to her qualifications.

The first 2020 candidate to front-burner this issue, Klobuchar’s proposed spending would be a little more than one-fourth the total needed through 2025 to maintain and adequately improve the nation’s metal-and-concrete skeleton, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). The senator would have Uncle Sam cover $650 billion of the cost, three-and-a-half times what Trump promised last year in his “plan” (more like squiggles on a napkin, as it skimped on dollars and details). Klobuchar would pay for it by borrowing the funds and a new federal infrastructure bank. She’d also raise the corporate tax rate to 25 percent and impose new fees on big banks and firms that ship jobs overseas. You can quibble with this revenue-raiser or that, but you can’t accuse her of ducking the hard decisions about paying for her program.

(snip)

Klobuchar’s plan includes improved public transit, which not only decreases traffic, but keeps greenhouse-gas emitting cars off the road. For all the grab-bag dubiousness of the Green New Deal, its infrastructure component -- greener mass transit, a power grid for distributing renewable energy, replacing lead pipes and more flood-resistant bridges, among other things — shows what infrastructure upgrades, done right, can do for the environment. Not to mention for employment. When he proposed a similar upgrade in his 2016 campaign, Bernie Sanders estimated the work would create 13 million jobs.

https://amp.wbur.org/cognoscenti/2019/04/30/infrastructure-trump-democrats-rich-barlow

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Politicians Like To Talk About Infrastructure, But Klobuchar Is The Only 2020 Candidate With A Real (Original Post) question everything May 2019 OP
I like Amy, but she's not the only one with a real plan involving infrastructure Indygram May 2019 #1
I think she has the potential to get more done as President than many of the others mtnsnake May 2019 #2
Sounds like a great plan. oasis May 2019 #3
Beware the ASCE and their mindset. Ron Green May 2019 #4
 

Indygram

(2,113 posts)
1. I like Amy, but she's not the only one with a real plan involving infrastructure
Wed May 1, 2019, 11:21 PM
May 2019

Beto's Climate Change Plan actually deals with a lot of infrastructure specifics.

https://betoorourke.com/climate-change/

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

mtnsnake

(22,236 posts)
2. I think she has the potential to get more done as President than many of the others
Thu May 2, 2019, 02:45 PM
May 2019

I'm not saying I think she should be our candidate just yet, but whenever she talks about a plan of hers, were she to become President, her plans actually seem very doable. Plus, when she is asked how she'll pay for any given plan of hers, she doesn't sidestep the question. She is prepared with the details of a payment plan that seems to make practical sense.

And Klobuchar won't pander. For example, if she doesn't think she could pass legislation that would give free tuition to every student in this country, she'll come right out and say that it would be impossible for her to promise something like that, as much as she would like to.

She might not seem as exciting as some of the others, but she sure does come off as being very believable.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Ron Green

(9,822 posts)
4. Beware the ASCE and their mindset.
Thu May 2, 2019, 02:55 PM
May 2019

Pouring massive money into development and innovation guarantees their careers, but moving to a paradigm of maintenance and repair better assures that cities and towns won’t be stuck with unaffordable infrastructure repair bills 30 years from now.

Beware also of infinite economic growth on a finite planet.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Politicians Like To Talk ...