Did I miss something?

[left-of-center2012]

Wasn't there an agreement among the Democratic candidates that they'd not attack each other?

[DoctorJoJo]

1. Not Sure That Applies to Those Who Aren't REALLY Democrats!

[aikoaiko]

2. I haven't seen any candidate 'attacking' another.

Unless attacking includes verbal criticism of past actions, policies, or plans.

[highplainsdem]

3. Unfortunately some candidates seem to think that doesn't apply when the frontrunner is the target.

[BeyondGeography]

4. Well it was inane anyway

Why would we even want that? It’s a campaign for the right to challenge for the most powerful office on earth, not a safe space.

[highplainsdem]

5. Why would we want that? Because the party has to unite behind the nominee.

[George II]

6. Yes, there was a "pledge". But the one who cajoled all the others into taking the pledge....

....was also the first to break it.

[Buzz cook]

7. Policy is fair game.

Its personal attacks that are out. Just as some people disagree with medicare for all, others can disagree with 2005 bankrutcy act.

If the former is a bad idea then saying so is not an attack. If the latter was a bad idea then pointing that out is no an attack.

Some supporters are being to emotional.

[Indygram]

8. Maybe you should check the rules, right next to the one about not bashing Democrats

eom

[question everything]

9. You need to distinguish between DU rules and the ones for the candidates themselves

And, no, I am not aware of such an agreement. And, of course, if a candidate is a Democrat only when it is convenient, any rules do not apply.

[Indygram]

10. I was replying to the Original post

I just found their question a bit ironic.