Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 08:24 PM Mar 2019

I don't care about negative attacks on candidates, I only care how they respond

Everyone of our candidates is going to be attacked for something sooner or later. If there is nothing to attack, they'll make something up, and the media will run with it. It's a given. I don't care. At all.

That sounds pretty callous and immoral, but it's the only way in our post-fact Trump world. Facts don't matter when Trump's lies are treated as truth. If the facts don't matter anymore (and obviously they don't), then I at least want someone who shares my values. Which means ignoring their real or imagined faults so we don't have another great candidate taken down by a trivial non-scandal scandal.

But their response to whatever "scandal" gets cooked up does matter. Because that's how Trump did it. He manipulated the media and shamelessly turned it around to make Clinton look like the crook. And he'll do that again. Countering that attack is worth everything.

AOC is the Democrat who responds best to attacks. She always has a snappy comeback to whatever they say about her. Unfortunately, she is too young. But I hope the older generation is learning from her. I'll be watching them when the attacks come, and whoever gives a good answer or turns it all back on their accuser is the candidate to beat Trump.

Please think about this when choosing a candidate. Whatever their other merits, they must be able to parry the inevitable attack. Shrug off whatever stupid nickname Trump comes up with. Defang the Russian troll farms. That's how we will win.

Edited to add: Think about this way. Take whatever negative information you have already heard about a candidate, put it into a Trump tweet then imagine the news covering it for days and saying it's really damaging information. How will that candidate respond and how effective will that response be.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't care about negative attacks on candidates, I only care how they respond (Original Post) marylandblue Mar 2019 OP
i wont support anyone who goes negative or nasty samnsara Mar 2019 #1
The nasty will come from all over, not necessarily from other Democrats marylandblue Mar 2019 #2
You should read about some of our earliest campaigns. WeekiWater Mar 2019 #3
Remember Bill Clinton's "war room"? Blue_true Mar 2019 #4
Defense is everything in 2020 Awsi Dooger Mar 2019 #5
 

samnsara

(17,602 posts)
1. i wont support anyone who goes negative or nasty
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 08:26 PM
Mar 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
2. The nasty will come from all over, not necessarily from other Democrats
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 08:28 PM
Mar 2019

People will plant stories and the media will amplify it. The candidate will need to respond. Can they squelch it and move on? That's key.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

WeekiWater

(3,259 posts)
3. You should read about some of our earliest campaigns.
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 09:33 PM
Mar 2019

Talk about nasty and dishonest. Lies were disseminated all over by local papers. It was dependent on who owned the paper or who a majority of the town liked(selling papers). Back in the day it was even worse as debunking the lies was almost impossible.

There really is little difference in how nasty campaigns are. This is all pretty weak compared to Adams v Jackson. That was some nasty stuff.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
4. Remember Bill Clinton's "war room"?
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 11:19 PM
Mar 2019

The function of people in that group was to not let a lie told about the campaign go unchallenged. President Obama had a similar group in 2008.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Awsi Dooger

(14,565 posts)
5. Defense is everything in 2020
Sat Mar 9, 2019, 12:53 AM
Mar 2019

I'm worried that the situational influence is being misunderstood and essentially butchered. If we nominate a barker that person will be shut down and nullified. It has to be someone calm and clever on counterattack. Hillary may have had likability baggage but she was incredibly stout. If our nominee flunks the early tests on defense then the opposition will savor the glass jaw weakness and flurry from all angles.

Of all the cycles I have been old enough to follow, this one has greatest potential to get the nominee brutally wrong by failing to understand how formidable an incumbent can be, and the qualities it takes to defeat that incumbent.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»I don't care about negati...