Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Related: About this forum
Congratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
Sen. Harris today seeking investigation into DOJ attack on CA automakers working on clean car rules
Matt Lopez @mattlopez3 4hNEW: @SenKamalaHarris today is calling for an investigation into the DOJ's attack on automakers working with CA on clean car rules.
Her letter raises the same questions she asked AG Barr: was the DOJ influenced by political pressure?
September 13, 2019
Harris Calls for Investigation of Justice Departments Inquiry into Automakers Working with California to Reduce Emissions
Letter to DOJ Inspector General Raises Questions about Potential Political Interference
WASHINGTON, D.C. U.S. Senator Kamala D. Harris (D-CA) on Friday sent a letter to Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz urging an investigation into the basis for the DOJs antitrust investigation into four automakers working with California to make cleaner, less-polluting vehicles. After the Trump administration announced its intent to roll back Obama-era emission standards, Ford, Honda, Volkswagen Group of North America, and BMW of North America agreed with California on a groundbreaking framework for emission reductions.
In an expression of hostility towards Californias regulatory authority, the Trump administration has launched a multi-pronged assault on Californias framework with the four automakers, wrote Harris. Academics and practicing lawyers have described the Justice Departments investigation as unusual and unprecedented, as there is nothing on the face of the framework that suggests any legitimate competitive concern.
Harris continued, This chain of events raises serious questions about whether federal law enforcement is being used to coerce the four automakers to abandon their efforts to make cleaner, less-polluting vehicles. It also raises questions about whether the machinery of the Justice Department is being used for partisan political purposes, or at the behest of special interest groups that oppose even modest efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
...full letter below:
September 13, 2019
The Honorable Michael E. Horowitz
Inspector General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20530
Dear Inspector General Horowitz:
I write to convey my concerns about the Justice Departments investigation into four automakers that expressed support for maintaining a national program with the state of California to make cleaner, less-polluting vehicles, and agreed with California to a framework for emission reductions consistent with this commitment.
When Congress wrote the Clean Air Act, it granted California the ability to apply for a special waiver to continue setting standards exceeding the applicable federal standard to address the unique air pollution problems faced by the state. While no other state is eligible for such a waiver, states can voluntarily adopt any standards California sets, occasionally leading to two regulatory standards across the nation. To achieve a consistent nationwide set of vehicle emissions and fuel economy standards, the Obama administration worked with California to establish the National Program in 2009, which complies with National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and California Air Resources Board (CARB) legal authorities to regulate vehicle emissions and fuel economy. The current standards, impacting model years 2017 through 2025, were finalized in 2012 and the EPA conducted a mid-term evaluation that in January 2017 affirmed the appropriateness of the standards. On March 15, 2017, the Trump administration announced that it would reconsider the Final Determination in an effort to roll back the existing emissions standards. The administrations final rule is expected imminently.
As the Trump administration prepared to roll back emission standards, CARB, on behalf of the state of California, announced a groundbreaking framework with four automakersFord, Honda, Volkswagen Group of America, and BMW of North America. The framework, which impacts model years 2022 through 2026, expresses the manufacturers commitment to a set of terms for light-duty greenhouse gas emissions standards while increasing automakers flexibility in achieving the standard. The automakers agreed to comply with these compromise standardswhich slightly loosened existing emissions standards set in 2012 but are far more stringent than standards proposed by the Trump administration. In exchange, California agreed to treat the automakers compliance with the framework as satisfying CARBs regulatory program. Discussions continue to formalize these understandings.
Notably, the four automakers negotiated with the state of California and proposed the framework after the White House declined an industry request to come up with a proposal to maintain a single national standard that recognized Californias authority. In June 2019, 17 of the worlds largest automakers warned President Trump that his plan to relax national standards could destabilize the automotive industry and hamper investment. Notwithstanding this industry plea, the EPA refused to re-enter negotiations with California and sought to move ahead with its original plan.
Now, in an expression of hostility towards Californias regulatory authority, the Trump administration has launched a multi-pronged assault on Californias framework with the four automakers. On September 6, it was reported that the Justice Department had launched an investigation into whether the four automakers had violated federal antitrust law by agreeing to follow the emissions program set forth in the framework with California. Academics and practicing lawyers have described the Justice Departments investigation as unusual and unprecedented, as there is nothing on the face of the framework that suggests any legitimate competitive concern. On the same day, the EPA and the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) also sent a letter to CARB, claiming that the states framework was inconsistent with federal law. The EPA and DOT assert that the framework undermines federal authority to set fuel economy and vehicle emissions standardsa position that is contrary to longstanding precedent under the Clean Air Act, and the terms of the framework.
This chain of events raises serious questions about whether federal law enforcement is being used to coerce the four automakers to abandon their efforts to make cleaner, less-polluting vehicles. It also raises questions about whether the machinery of the Justice Department is being used for partisan political purposes, or at the behest of special interest groups that oppose even modest efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Given these concerns, I strongly urge the Office of Inspector General to investigate the purported grounds for the Justice Departments investigation of the four automakers. I also request that the Office of Inspector General evaluate whether the Justice Department has received any requests or suggestions, whether express or implied, to investigate the emissions framework between California and the automakers.
Sincerely,
Senator Kamala D. Harris
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 554 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (18)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sen. Harris today seeking investigation into DOJ attack on CA automakers working on clean car rules (Original Post)
bigtree
Sep 2019
OP
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)1. K & R!
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Kind of Blue
(8,709 posts)2. Excellent! Still taking care of business while on the campaign trail.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Hekate
(90,793 posts)3. Off to the greatest page with you. That's my Senator!
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)4. K&R
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)5. K&R
Go get those GOP criminals Senator Harris!
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)6. Why is GOP only for "states rights" in right wing states?
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,192 posts)7. K&R
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Andy823
(11,495 posts)8. I never get tired
of watching her take down Barr like that. Anyone who thinks she can't take on trump needs to watch this, over and over again.
It's not easy taking on a narcissist, but of all the candidates Harris is the one person I would never doubt can do it!
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Andy823
(11,495 posts)9. K&R nt
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden