Turley argues trump should get the benefit of his obstruction by "crimes not proven"

[EveHammond13]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Democratic Primaries forum).

NO. WRONG. We're done with RW bullshit.

[TidalWave46]

1. That is a very special position to hold.

One would simply have to become really good at obstruction.

[50 Shades Of Blue]

2. K & R!

[fleur-de-lisa]

3. Wow. They are grasping at any stupid argument they can think of . . . pathetic.

[Vogon_Glory]

4. IOKALAYAAR Is No Ground For Automatic Acquittal

The Founding Fathers were loose about defining “High Crimes and Misdemeanors,” but bribery was one specifically named offense.

[highplainsdem]

5. I agree with you. But I'm guessing you meant to post this OP in GD, not Primaries.

[Hortensis]

6. PBS basically pushed this line, including quoting Turley,

more than once. Both experts were dishonest. For "balance" to Turley, the show quoted Prof. Karlan's marginally unseemly reference to Trump's son, which was used to prove how badly behaved we were along with the Republicans (a false equalization pushed on every hostile site). And that's all they quoted. Nothing about our constitution or the basis for impeachment, guilt for which Dems are reportedly still trying to establish.

The entire purpose of this judicial committee hearing was to try to "bolster" our case.

PBS's blatantly pro-Trump and anti-Democratic coverage indicates just how important this is to the powers that now direct their messages. We need a complete housecleaning of that place.

[Omaha Steve]

7. After a review by forum hosts....LOCKING

Wrong forum. Please repost this in GD.