Message auto-removed

[Name removed]

[zaj]

3. Brilliant! Greatest trolling choice in Dem history.

[Lexee]

2. We are totally clueless how Sanders would go. His priority is not necessarily our priority.

He has things he wants done and will tend to look toward the judge that will give him that, and that will not always align with social justice issues. So, that is a conversation I would like Sanders to have with us, the voters. The Democratic base.

[oldsoftie]

11. But the question was "If a Democrat wins..."

I dont think you have to worry about Sanders

[ehrnst]

16. +100.

[juxtaposed]

4. sounds like a fishing expedition you're looking for? With just a few posts

[Mr.Bill]

5. Kamala Harris

[33taw]

6. Depends on the senate makeup.

[Mr.Bill]

13. If we take the senate but Trump stays as president

Schumer should give this list of names to Trump and tell him no one else will even get a hearing.

[33taw]

14. Agree.

[Ohiogal]

7. The man who should have been there in the first place

Merrick Garland

[Karma13612]

8. Although the conversation does need to be had,

I just feel it’s bad luck at this point.

Makes me worry that something is going to happen to one of “our” Justices before we have the majority to take proper action.

[The Mouth]

9. Obama, Harris, Booker

Obama would be the first person to have been a Representative, a Senator, a President and a SCOTUS justice

[Hekate]

10. Not playing. I do not count unhatched chickens this long before they are hatched. nt

[dewsgirl]

12. Sally Yates, Kamala Harris

[David__77]

15. How about Goodwin Liu?

...

[flotsam]

17. Know who ain't?

Merrick Garland who was a pretty much centrist candidate to begin with. Now we need 35 year old flamethrowers to the far left of Mao Zedong just to break even-and if you have a majority in both the house and senate they let you do it...