Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

RandySF

(58,812 posts)
Wed Feb 5, 2020, 10:26 PM Feb 2020

Trump supporter Rich Lowry hypocritically bashes Bloomberg spending.

The rich are different from you and me—they can buy themselves instant presidential campaigns.

Former New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg has elbowed himself into the Democratic nomination race solely on the basis of his personal fortune.

His campaign is high-handed as only a billionaire many times over could even contemplate. He entered late, is skipping the early contests and hasn’t participated in any of the debates to date (although that will change soon thanks to the Democratic National Committee adjusting its rules to retrofit them for Bloomberg).

Without more than $50 billion to his name, Bloomberg would almost certainly be running a campaign like another late-entrant, former Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, who hasn’t been heard from since filing for the New Hampshire primary a couple of months ago.

Bloomberg’s political strategy has always been built on the belief that nothing succeeds like excess. If he wants it, he can buy it, and money is no object.

It’s a free country, and Bloomberg can spend as much money as he likes on whatever suits his fancy. No one should try to stop him from doing it through campaign-finance laws or other rules. In the scheme of things, lavishing tens of millions on your own presidential campaign is probably worthier than lavishing it on private islands, antique car collections, or yachts.

But Bloomberg 2020 is still an affront to small-d democratic sensibilities, a tribute not to his superior political skills or messaging compared with the other candidates, but his access to a personal bank account that the rest of them lack.



https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/02/05/the-offensive-bloomberg-campaign-111182

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump supporter Rich Lowry hypocritically bashes Bloomberg spending. (Original Post) RandySF Feb 2020 OP
Our money fueled system is the problem. But the solution spooky3 Feb 2020 #1
+1 RandySF Feb 2020 #2
+2 Vivienne235729 Feb 2020 #5
Then perhaps Lowry would agree to stringent campaign finance reform YOHABLO Feb 2020 #3
At least Bloomberg squirecam Feb 2020 #4
 

spooky3

(34,452 posts)
1. Our money fueled system is the problem. But the solution
Wed Feb 5, 2020, 10:33 PM
Feb 2020

is not to tell Democrats with money that they can’t use it. We’re in a metaphorical gunfight, and knives alone won’t suffice.

Criticize the system, not those struggling to win within it.

Lowry’s comments just say to me that they are starting to fear Bloomberg. Good.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
3. Then perhaps Lowry would agree to stringent campaign finance reform
Wed Feb 5, 2020, 10:35 PM
Feb 2020

and repeal of 'Citizens United'.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

squirecam

(2,706 posts)
4. At least Bloomberg
Wed Feb 5, 2020, 10:46 PM
Feb 2020

Is using his own money. As opposed to Trump who promised to, but of course didn’t.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Trump supporter Rich Lowr...