NEW: ⁦@BernieSanders⁩ campaign will ask the Iowa Democratic Party to look into "irregularities''

[Donkees]

Link to tweet

[brooklynite]

1. "We don't trust the numbers that say we won"?

[HerbChestnut]

3. It's worth looking into when there's problems like this...

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/07/iowa-caucus-map-of-precincts-where-the-data-appear-to-be-irregular.html

A common error, according to CNBC’s analysis, is that in many precincts — possibly more than 80 — the number of votes counted in what’s known as the “final alignment” was greater than the number in the “first alignment.”

That discrepancy is theoretically impossible under caucus rules, which are determined by the state party. Under those rules, voters gather in the first alignment to express support for their candidates. Supporters of candidates who do not reach a minimum viability threshold, generally 15%, must reallocate their support in the “final alignment.”

[HerbChestnut]

2. That's fair.

When the total final alignment vote count is higher than the first alignment, there's something wrong.

[OneMoreCupOfCoffee]

4. What a shock!

[FloridaBlues]

5. Good was hoping one of the candidates would do this

[msongs]

6. must be a shocker that his coronation has been postponed lol nt

[gollygee]

7. OMG it's just like last time

Why can't he just accept that everyone doesn't like him best and someone else might win?