Just to review: Sanders in 2016 got 60%. Sanders in 2020 getting 26%.

[brooklynite]

It seems that, if people have choices available, they don't choose Sanders.

[George II]

1. Yes, and in 2016 he got 36 delegates in IA + NH, in 2020 only 21 delegates in IA + NH

[evertonfc]

2. Sanders isn't going to be our nominee

Period.

[Zolorp]

3. From your keyboard to God's eyes.

[still_one]

4. Wow, I thought it was 50% less. It is even worse than that. Interesting perspective

and a consideration if Sanders true Lu is the most viable candidate

[msongs]

5. 74% of the voters flat out reject me but I won I tell ya, and won bigggggg nt

[Bonobo]

6. How is that surprising to you?

There were 2 candidates in the 2016 primary and there are 8 now.

[pnwmom]

7. Right. The larger field doesn't explain why half his voters didn't stick with him this time.

[thesquanderer]

10. We always knew that a lot of his 2016 was at least as much a vote against HRC,

so yeah, he benefited from being the Hillary alternative. Still, today, where voters have many options, it seems more Dem voters are liking Sanders than are liking anyone else.

[pnwmom]

12. Most voters have just now started to pay attention. Till now low-information voters knew Bernie,

and Biden but didn't know much about the rest.

Now they're getting to know the others.

[aikoaiko]

8. Whatever gets you through the night...

It’s alright.

[LonePirate]

9. It seems that 34% difference is comprised of the ABC group - Anybody But Clinton.

It's not reflective of a drop in Bernie's support, although there likely is a slight one.

[Tipperary]

11. Yes, I thought Sanders would have had a better showing.

I really doubt SC will be good to him.