"They didn't come out in droves. And that's a problem for Democrats,"

[LAS14]

said Gloria Borger. NO, Gloria, it's NOT a problem. It's a symptom of the fact that we have a field of very attractive candidates and the 40% undecided couldn't decide in time to vote. Many of us are waiting to see who has the most appeal to voters, hence the most likelihood of beating Trump. Just wait for the explosion of energy when we finally get a candidate!

[BusyBeingBest]

1. I agree--Democrats can't wait to vote against Trump, probably

lots of them don't care who the nominee is.

[UniteFightBack]

2. Lawrence brought up an excellent point that 10K Republicans voted for Weld and dump lost

NH by like 2,400 votes so dump can't afford to lose not one vote and he's done nothing to gain votes.

So Lawrence drove home that these people took the time out of their day, got in their cars and trucks and drove to vote against dump in the puke primary.

Now that is good news WE ALL CAN AGREE ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[LAS14]

3. Wo!!! Really???????

Surely this deserves it's own post????

[Dem4Life1102]

4. Borger has always been a right wing hack

Don’t understand why CNN employees her.

[question everything]

5. I've recently read that since 2008 many Iowans turned Republicans

And this, in part, is the reason for the difference in attendance.

[JudyM]

6. It's being reported that turnout is already higher than 2016 and possibly 2008, with only 90% in.

[democrattotheend]

7. I just heard the opposite on MSNBC

They said turnout surpassed 2016 and might surpass 2008.

Ideally it would be higher than both, since both 2008 and 2016 had a competitive Republican primary.