It was a horrible night for Bloomberg. I don't see how he recovers

[DemocratSinceBirth]

Maybe it provides an opening for Joe.

[Evergreen Emerald]

1. No. It is an opening for Trump.

[redstateblues]

7. Yep. Nobody went after Trump.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

2. His money can buy a lot of advertising,

which reaches many more people than watch debates.

[redstateblues]

8. I never watch the debates. Watching them go after each other is not appealing

[Jersey Devil]

3. Won't make any difference in Nevada

So many people there have voted early, before the debates, that it probably will not matter. So the earliest we will see any effect is SC

[cherryinpa]

4. Yes

Joe now needs to come back and attack hard.

Bloomberg showed he is weak, yes, he has money but zero credibility and he's been a terrible distraction for the moderates.

Also now Klobucher is down and out.

Joe needs to come out strong and take the lead moderate role and if that means putting Bloomberg/Amy out of the game so be it. We don't have time for waffles, we need to coalesce around a strong moderate before we get into the danger zone.

[Bengus81]

5. No...it was a horrible night for Democrats

They squandered valuable FREE National TV time for a piling on fest of Bloomberg instead of talking about Trump and his CABAL trying to totally take over the United States of America. Mike isn't a big mouth,shout out kind of speaker like Trump and even some on stage. I think he stood silent for several minutes thinking that Holt was going to ask HIM a question instead of yet another for Bernie and Warren. Holt lost total control of that debate very early on.

[redstateblues]

9. We are just handing Trump four more years. Pathetic

[njhoneybadger]

6. I wouldn't mind if it did

This is Joe's third presidential run and he still hasn't won a single primary.
And Joe does the best in the swing states we need to win the presidency.