Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Related: About this forum
Congratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
The Atlantic: The Sixty Trillion Dollar Man
At the end of the day, Bernie will say whatever he needs to say to win even if there is no way that a significant portion of his proposals will ever be enacted. Elizabeth Warren actually acknowledged costs and proposed how to pay for her plan and Bernie Sanders (ironically) attacked her for raising taxes. Yet, Bernie refuses to provide any explanation of how his plan fits together.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/the-sixty-trillion-dollar-man/ar-BB10qrP6?ocid=spartanntp
The price of Bernie Sanders' agenda could be his biggest general-election weakness. But his rivals haven't yet made him explain how he'd cover the full cost.
Bernie Sanders faced more pointed attacks last night over his potential vulnerabilities than he ever has at a debate. But the blustery and disorderly session once again failed to fully explore what could be the Vermont senators greatest general-election weakness: the massive size and scope of his spending and tax proposals, which, depending on the estimate, would cost $50 trillion to $60 trillion over the next 10 years. That would roughly double the size of the federal government, an unprecedented increase outside of wartime.
More so than in any previous session, Sanders at times seemed rattled and tentative as his rivals subjected him to a crossfire of criticismover his record on gun control; my colleague Edward-Isaac Doveres report that he seriously considered a primary challenge to Barack Obama in 2012; his praise for aspects of Fidel Castros record in Cuba; and his success, or lack thereof, at getting things done in Washington. The evening showed the first sign of uneasiness for Sanders on a debate stage in this election cycle, says Lily Adams, the former communications director for Kamala Harriss presidential campaign. For the first time, we saw moments where he was not 100 percent sure of what his rebuttal was going to be.
But Sanders benefited from the chaotic nature of the debate, which prevented his rivals from sustaining any individual line of attack against him for very long. And when he wasnt on the defensive, he confidently delivered his populist promise to deliver an economy that works better for working families.
Bernie Sanders faced more pointed attacks last night over his potential vulnerabilities than he ever has at a debate. But the blustery and disorderly session once again failed to fully explore what could be the Vermont senators greatest general-election weakness: the massive size and scope of his spending and tax proposals, which, depending on the estimate, would cost $50 trillion to $60 trillion over the next 10 years. That would roughly double the size of the federal government, an unprecedented increase outside of wartime.
More so than in any previous session, Sanders at times seemed rattled and tentative as his rivals subjected him to a crossfire of criticismover his record on gun control; my colleague Edward-Isaac Doveres report that he seriously considered a primary challenge to Barack Obama in 2012; his praise for aspects of Fidel Castros record in Cuba; and his success, or lack thereof, at getting things done in Washington. The evening showed the first sign of uneasiness for Sanders on a debate stage in this election cycle, says Lily Adams, the former communications director for Kamala Harriss presidential campaign. For the first time, we saw moments where he was not 100 percent sure of what his rebuttal was going to be.
But Sanders benefited from the chaotic nature of the debate, which prevented his rivals from sustaining any individual line of attack against him for very long. And when he wasnt on the defensive, he confidently delivered his populist promise to deliver an economy that works better for working families.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 769 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Atlantic: The Sixty Trillion Dollar Man (Original Post)
TomCADem
Feb 2020
OP
Everyone should keep in mind that the United States budget this year is under $5 trillion!
George II
Feb 2020
#1
George II
(67,782 posts)1. Everyone should keep in mind that the United States budget this year is under $5 trillion!
If implemented that would more than DOUBLE the entire US budget.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
TomCADem
(17,390 posts)2. Bernie's Proposals. They Defy...
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
George II
(67,782 posts)3. He should hire Andrew Yang as a senior campaign adviser.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)4. Sanders posted his plan to raise funds this week. Doubt it's enough. Warren's proposals are even
more expensive.
Don't see where she has much room to criticize Sanders.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
David__77
(23,627 posts)5. Great! He's a bit on the austere side.
....
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
TomCADem
(17,390 posts)6. If You Like Austerity and You Appreciate Math
Then Bernie should NOT be your candidate. Even he repeatedly admits he has no idea how much his ideas cost.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
David__77
(23,627 posts)7. I don't favor austerity economics, no.
...
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided