I have one question for everyone before we head into Super Tuesday

[RandySF]

How big a risk are you willing to take in the most important election in recent history?

[jimfields33]

1. None at all that why we must all vote for Bernie

[brush]

3. FYI: Sanders is the risk the OP is hinting at.

[jimfields33]

5. Oh wow. Are you serious?

[brush]

6. You seem to be unaware of the risks to the party and country if he gets our nod.

trump for another term is not a pleasing thought.

[jimfields33]

7. Nonsense

He has done what needs with young and Hispanics. He’s got this.

[brush]

8. We'll see. Older voter out-vote younger ones two-to-one.

They actually show up.

[Hassin Bin Sober]

9. .

[Codeine]

15. #bendtheknee

[BusyBeingBest]

2. There's no 100% safe choice in candidates, if that's what you're asking.

They're all risky for various reasons.

[scarytomcat]

18. I will not.vote for a republicon

Dem will definitely lose if they put up a republican, please rethink.

[jmg257]

4. You don't concentrate on risks. You concentrate on results.

No risk is too great to prevent the necessary job from getting done. – Chuck Yeager

[ripcord]

10. Its funnny that while Biden supporters can guarantee a loss for Sanders

They can't guarantee a win for Biden, selective fortunetelling.

[Gothmog]

11. Beating trump is my main issue and keeping control of the House

Link to tweet

[LenaW]

12. I know I shouldn't

but ever since I saw "Our Brand Is Crisis" I can't help laughing when people resort to "the most important election of our lifetime."

But anyway, yeah, I get it.

We can't risk:

- electing the guy who might have dementia
- electing the guy that people under 50 can't get behind
- electing the guy with the history of harassing women
- electing the guy with the history of harassing women
- electing a woman
- electing someone who isn't a woman
- electing someone who is too old
- electing someone who is too young and inexperienced
- electing someone who is white
- electing someone who isn't white
- electing someone who is too far left
- electing someone who is too moderate

I don't think we should nominate anyone. It's just too risky.

[Funtatlaguy]

13. We have ONLY ONE (possibly unanswerable) question.

Do we go with a moderate who may/may not bring out more moderate Dems/Indys/Never Trump Repubs but may/may not suppress our unexcited progressive base.

Or do we go with a progressive who may/may not bring out an unprecedented number of 18-35 and juice up our base but may/may not get many moderates or never Trumpers.

I had hoped Warren could split the difference and unite us but I think sadly think her ship has sailed.

We MUST have someone that can win Wisconsin/Mich/Pa AND have some coattails in Senate races like Col/Az/NC/Maine.

[Laelth]

14. My one vote isn't much of a risk at all.

I intend to listen to the will of the voters and vote blue no matter who. I like ALL of our potential nominees. They're much better than our choices in 1988 and 1992; I can say that, at least.

No, from my perspective, the primary vote I will soon cast is no great risk.

-Laelth

[Codeine]

16. Meh. I think we're already pretty much fucked.

I think I’m psychologically girding myself for the inevitable second Trump term.

[Gothmog]

17. The moment Bernie Sanders becomes the nominee 24 / 7 news & ads like this thread with video about ra

Link to tweet

[aikoaiko]

19. All of our candidates are risky against Trump. Just like 2016.

Really, if we learned anything, we presidential elections are not normal anymore.

[TreasonousBastard]

20. Huh? I intend to risk nothing and vote for whom I think is the best choice...

left after the Super Tuesday bloodbath.