Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Cable News Clips
Related: About this forumLaurence Tribe: The Supreme Court is suppressing evidence - The Last Word - MSNBC
After the Supreme Court agrees to hear Donald Trumps immunity claim, Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe joins MSNBCs Lawrence ODonnell to discuss the impact this could have on Donald Trumps reelection. Professor Tribe says that this is not the way a country that is concerned to preserve the rule of law and constitutional democracy would proceed. - Aired on 02/28/2024.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1232 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (25)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Laurence Tribe: The Supreme Court is suppressing evidence - The Last Word - MSNBC (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
Feb 2024
OP
You're right, how many in this country know the makeup of the Supreme Court, let alone follow their decisions?
Rhiannon12866
Feb 2024
#2
The Supreme Court; answering questions that were never asked, aka legislating.
Uncle Joe
Feb 2024
#5
Hermit-The-Prog
(34,237 posts)1. Not enough people understand that we have a Subversive Court.
Rhiannon12866
(209,778 posts)2. You're right, how many in this country know the makeup of the Supreme Court, let alone follow their decisions?
Unless, of course, they have become victims of their decisions, like a woman who is stricken with a toxic pregnancy.
DFW
(54,930 posts)3. The court that was meant to be the most impartial
That court now bends over backwards to protect the biggest scoundrel that ever sat in the Oval Office, since three of them are nominees of his, and three others often act as if they wish they had been.
Hermit-The-Prog
(34,237 posts)4. This court subverts, rather than interprets, the U.S. Constitution.
This court puts it extreme ideology above law, precedent, logic, and the Constitution, and thereby subverts the foundation of the U.S.
[ Edit to add: ]
Uncle Joe
(58,959 posts)5. The Supreme Court; answering questions that were never asked, aka legislating.
Thanks for the thread Rhiannon.