Cable News Clips
Related: About this forumReport From Gaza: "Devastating" Israeli Raid to Free 4 Hostages Kills 270+ Palestinians
In one of the single bloodiest Israeli attacks in Gaza over the last eight months, at least 274 Palestinians were killed, including at least 64 children, and nearly 700 were wounded in a raid on the Nuseirat refugee camp on Saturday that freed four Israelis held hostage in Gaza since October 7. "Children were shot dead. Elderly people were shot dead. Women were shot dead," says Gaza-based journalist Akram al-Satarri, who was at the Nuseirat refugee camp on Saturday. Speaking to us from outside the Al-Aqsa Hospital in Deir al-Balah one of the last remaining hospitals that are partially functioning in Gaza al-Satarri says the death toll is rising by the minute, as wounded Palestinians aren't able to receive the care they need. Al-Satarri also discusses the World Food Programme's recent suspension of aid operations in Gaza City and Israel's withholding of aid on the entire Gaza Strip.
Democracy Now! is an independent global news hour that airs on over 1,500 TV and radio stations Monday through Friday. Watch our livestream at democracynow.org Mondays to Fridays 8-9 a.m. ET.
Richard D
(10,018 posts). . . had Hamas never taken the hostages or, since they were stupid enough to take them, by releasing them.
Every death is on Hamas.
Gaugamela
(3,511 posts)Richard D
(10,018 posts). . . All you need is a time machine. And there's a lot more to it than most know.
However, today is today, now is now. And October 7 happened, and hostages were taken.
What is the solution now? We need to discuss now and not go back 70 years in time as an excuse for every atrocity of today.
Do we have a vast movement in this country of Native American terrorists? Terrorism from People of Color? Japanese? Germans? Nope, we don't. And all had horrible atrocities committed against them.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)period which some not so subtly use to justify eliminating Israel.
Richard D
(10,018 posts)TeamProg
(6,630 posts)displaced and their culture forever changed.
There's no way to smooth it over, their land was taken from them, yes or no?
Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)In the 20th century, approximately 900,000 Jews migrated, fled, or were expelled from Muslim-majority countries throughout Africa and Asia. Primarily a consequence of the 1948 ArabIsraeli War, the mass movement mainly transpired from 1948 to the early 1970s
Does this Nakba deserve no recognition at all? Why not?
TeamProg
(6,630 posts)European invaders that could be defined as terrorism, but white man had the U.S. Army.. Didn't stand a chance. White men called the natives "savages" to dehumanize them so their lives were worth less then whites'.
History will not be kind.
Bad Thoughts
(2,657 posts)xocetaceans
(4,442 posts)...well sourced and unbiased?
One position might be that the "Nakba" was a direct result of one group waging a war and losing. As such, it might be taken that holding to the "Nakba" now might be seen as roughly equivalent to holding to the Confederacy's "Lost Cause" now. Are there credible historical sources that can be cited which show that that proposed approximation should not be considered as accurate?
Richard D
(10,018 posts)And I don't have any books to recommend. This is an interesting article though, that might prove a starting point. I've read dozens of articles and blogs about this, but sadly I have not kept track of them.
https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-nakba-obsession
xocetaceans
(4,442 posts)..., but it not clear that any of "correct", "true", "valid", "apt", "appropriate", etc. would be much better in its stead. Maybe "similar" would be a better word, but the whole sentence would have to be rephrased to incorporate that term.
Regardless, it seems far from clear to me that the "Nakba", as it were, is much different than the "Lost Cause" of the Confederacy in that they both seem to be lingering justifications in the minds of some among the defeated who would like to continue a conflict that was decided at a point in time that is getting closer to one century ago and to two centuries ago, respectively.
Thanks for the link.
Richard D
(10,018 posts)The narrative of now is all a lie.
https://time.com/vault/issue/1948-05-03/page/27/
Richard D
(10,018 posts)The Nakba Narrative is Nonsense
By: Alex Safian, PhD May 17, 2023
https://www.camera.org/article/nakba-narrative-is-nonsense/