Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(258,910 posts)
Tue Aug 26, 2025, 08:35 PM Aug 2025

Retired Major General calls Trump's National Guard plans 'unneeded and dangerous' - PBS NewsHour



Trump signed an executive order Monday that said each state’s National Guard units “are resourced, trained, organized and available to assist federal, state and local law enforcement in quelling civil disturbances.” Nick Schifrin discussed the latest with retired Army Major General Randy Manner, the former acting vice chief of the National Guard Bureau. - Aired on 08/26/2025.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Retired Major General calls Trump's National Guard plans 'unneeded and dangerous' - PBS NewsHour (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 Aug 2025 OP
Where are the active duty generals? RainCaster Aug 2025 #1
Perhaps we'll see one speak out and risk court martial, but I doubt it. pat_k Aug 2025 #2
It sounds like their courage is limited by their paychecks RainCaster Aug 2025 #3

pat_k

(13,856 posts)
2. Perhaps we'll see one speak out and risk court martial, but I doubt it.
Tue Aug 26, 2025, 09:57 PM
Aug 2025
UCMJ Article 88: Commissioned officers who use "contemptuous words" against the President, Vice President, Congress, or other senior officials can face a court-martial. A conviction carries a maximum punishment of dismissal from the service, forfeiture of pay, and up to one year of confinement.


Although criticism of this off-the-rails president would be viewed by most as a patriotic duty, they could be prosecuted for "partisan activities." The proceedings would be darned interesting!

DoD Directive 1344.10: This directive explicitly prohibits active-duty military personnel from engaging in partisan political activities that could be perceived as associating the Department of Defense (DoD) with a political party or candidate.


Of course, they all take an oath to the Constitution, not to the person occupying the White House, so we could see active duty officers who take that oath seriously speaking out against actions that violate the Constitution. But such serving officers would have to be prepared to become the target of every horrible consequence the 47 regime would unleash against them.

RainCaster

(13,888 posts)
3. It sounds like their courage is limited by their paychecks
Tue Aug 26, 2025, 11:51 PM
Aug 2025

... and not their belief in the Constitution.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Cable News Clips»Retired Major General cal...