Cable News Clips
Related: About this forumSupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas blasts progressivism as threat to America - ABC News
Thomas said that the values enshrined in the 1776 Declaration of Independence have fallen out of favor among Americans.
====================
I have the same question regarding Clarence Thomas as Orrex has about Trump.
Ocelot II
(130,808 posts)You wouldn't have been appointed to the Supreme Court according to the values of the new United States in 1776. You wouldn't have even been allowed to learn to read. Progressivism is what got you your job.
displacedvermoter
(4,707 posts)I understand what you are saying, I guess.
displacedvermoter
(4,707 posts)Right wingers always point to the Declaration of Independence as their go to document, over the Constitution. Shrub and his crew always cited the Declaration as justification for whatever they were doing. The Constitution has that nasty Bill of Rights and they hate all but a couple of the amendments.
But yeah, back in those enlightened days of 1776, Clarence might have been lucky and worked as one of the signer's butlers, or he could have ended up a field hand. And nobody would have given two shits for his opinions, either way, on anything, never mind the law.
sop
(18,861 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(136,253 posts)Harker
(17,898 posts)"I hope so!"
SamKnause
(14,914 posts)You are a corrupt piece of trash.
There certainly is nothing supreme about you or this court.
You should be in prison not on the bench.
Blue Owl
(59,284 posts)marble falls
(72,010 posts)... one of your "friends".
jls4561
(3,201 posts)I got mine, screw the rest of you. Its his theory of jurisprudence.
Autumn
(48,977 posts)eppur_se_muova
(42,086 posts)ChicagoTeamster
(1,056 posts)as the country did. That's part of the freedom it is designed to protect.
Conservatives are the ones who the Constitution has fallen out of favor with. They want to restrict other's freedom.
Baitball Blogger
(52,477 posts)The greatest failure of our democracy was not listening to Anita Hill and taking her seriously enough to stop Clarence Thomas from soiling the reputation of the Supreme Court.
Stargazer99
(3,528 posts)Uncle Joe
(65,258 posts)Article III clearly spells out the S.C.'s job which is to interpret the latter not the former, so is Thomas abandoning his oath to the Constitution?
The Declaration of Independence wasn't a marriage, it was a divorce.
Thanks for the thread TexasTowelie