Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RC

RC's Journal
RC's Journal
March 20, 2012

We have our own War on Terror right here on DU!

The preferred weapons of the terrorists here are words. Yes words. Mere words. Signified by dark symbols on a white background. Easy movable shadows on a screen that blow up in the eyes of the victim, so that the dirty words are the only thing they can see.
Quit often the true meaning of the word as used, is lost in the sheer terror of some by just seeing it on their computer screens.
Horrible, terrible words that cannot be spelled out, without incurring the wraith of the self appointed terror victims. Horrible words like the In*ne word or a totally obscene word like the "T*t" word, as in "T*t for tat". How dare someone use an obscene slang term for a woman's body part as if it had no connection! Think of the children! Never mind that some were br**st fed themselves.
Words in a widely spoken language with roots in a large number of other languages. Latin, French, Spanish, Greek, German. And of course, Old English - from which our dirty words really come from.

What is worse are the words we do not even know are dirty words. Horrible, evil words like "Hy**eria", "Orc**d", "Se**nar", "Av***do", and many more words too dirty to put on paper or pronounce.


Let's take Hy**eria, please. The term comes from the Greek "Hystera," which means womb or ovary, which also gives us the term hysterectomy. Back in the Victorian era, it was considered a nervous condition for females, caused by their lady-parts. Which, like riots, was stopped with fucking fire hoses. For women who didn't like being shot in the crotch with a jet of high-pressure water, the doctor could use his fingers to create the same mysterious effect, which they referred to as "hysterical paroxysm" before someone explained to them what an or**sm was.

Orc**d comes from the Greek, orkhis, which means tes**cle.

Se**nar comes from the Latin term, "Seminis" which means s*men. It's the ej**ulation that gave birth to something new.

Av***do comes from the Nahuatl (The language of the Aztecs) "ahuacatl" which means te***cle, because of its shape.


8 Everyday Words With X-Rated Origins
http://www.cracked.com/article_16539_8-everyday-words-with-x-rated-origins.html


I can't take any more. I'm going to take a nice hot soapy shower and go lie down now.

March 16, 2012

Students don’t want Minnesota lawmakers to ‘get out of jail free’

ST. PAUL – Legislators who drink and drive should face the same consequences as everyone else, a group of college students argues.

In Minnesota, legislators get what some deem a “get out of jail free” card protecting them from arrest for certain crimes. Some students from Concordia University in St. Paul were not happy when they discovered that legislative immunity could shield lawmakers from drunken driving arrests.

A House committee passed the students’ proposal Thursday to allow legislators to be arrested for drunken driving, sending it to a full House vote. The experience has taught the students a lot about the legislative process.

http://www.grandforksherald.com/event/article/id/232203/


All politicians need to follow ALL the laws the rest of us do.
In this country, we supposedly have citizen legislators, not royalty who answer only to God.
The same goes for our Congress critters in WDC, who answer to their owners, the lobbyists. We hired these Congress critters and pay part of their salaries, so we should at least get some say in the laws they pass. Are we not persons too?
March 14, 2012

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Its Equal Protection Clause requires each state to provide equal protection under the law to all people within its jurisdiction. This clause was the basis for Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court decision which precipitated the dismantling of racial segregation in United States education. In Reed v. Reed (1971), the Supreme Court ruled that laws arbitrarily requiring sex discrimination violated the Equal Protection Clause.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution


Equal Protection Clause
The Equal Protection Clause, part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, provides that "no state shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."[1] The Equal Protection Clause can be seen as an attempt to secure the promise of the United States' professed commitment to the proposition that "all men are created equal"[2] by empowering the judiciary to enforce that principle against the states.[3] The Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause applies only to state governments, but the requirement of equal protection has been read to apply to the federal government as a component of Fifth Amendment due process.

More concretely, the Equal Protection Clause, along with the rest of the Fourteenth Amendment, marked a great shift in American constitutionalism. Before the enactment of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Bill of Rights protected individual rights only from invasion by the federal government. After the Fourteenth Amendment was enacted, the Constitution also protected rights from abridgment by state leaders and governments, even including some rights that arguably were not protected from abridgment by the federal government. In the wake of the Fourteenth Amendment, the states could not, among other things, deprive people of the equal protection of the laws. What exactly such a requirement means has been the subject of much debate, and the story of the Equal Protection Clause is the gradual explication of its meaning.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Protection_Clause



The way I read this, Arizona is in violation of the US Constitution (again), not that they care.
March 13, 2012

Actually, he is not a liar.

To lie, one has to know the truth. Too many Conservatives cannot tell reality from what they wish it to be. Reality for them can be anything that gets them what they want.
They actually do have mental impairment. This is not in anyway hallucination. This is simply the way they perceive the world around themselves.

March 12, 2012

Because the more Conservative one is, the more likely one is to have religion.

And the more likely to have strong beliefs in total non-sense, like for instance, Creationism. And the more likely to want to foist their religion on others through law.
The very reason for the Separation of Church and State in the Constitution and the reason people started coming over here form Europe in the first place.

My question however is, If religion is so true, If there is only one God and we are supposed to live out lives the way He wants us to, then why are their so many flavors of religion? Why are there so many different flavors of each denomination of each religion. Christianity even? There are far fewer political beliefs, over all, than religious beliefs.

Surely, if religion were true, there would be far less differences among all the religions. A look in any local phone book should convince most people that there is something wrong here. They all can't be correct. No way. They run the from straight laced conservative to quite Liberal churches like Unitarian Universalist. And almost every singly one of them thinks they are the only way to correctly believe. The more conservative, the more rigid.

March 8, 2012

Spring Buds

[center]






[/center]
March 8, 2012

This is a political web site. Or at least it still pretends to be.

And we are chastened by some to not denigrate anyone, anywhere, their actions or their sensitivities, because some words might invoke negative feelings in another DU'er? Even though some of these objectionable words were/are use against a Republican for something dangerous or stupid that the Republicans want or did?
Do the women need to be protected from some words and the men need to be protected from others? Are we so vulnerable to mere words, are we are so defenseless, so delicate, that we have to add evil words to an ever growing list, to remind ourselves not to use them? so as to keep ourselves from curling up into a ball?
Not calling out any one DU're, group or running them down, as per the rules should suffice. It worked with DU2 But this list goes way beyond the rules.

This is not the fight we are here for. This is not the reason DU was started in 2000. That reason is still alive and well.
Maybe we should concentrate on stopping the Republicans/Conservatives, who are doing far worse than using objectionable words against us. Could we handle it, if they did start using those bad words against us? I should hope so.

Keep it up and DU will be fit for Sesame Street. Many main stream news stories will eventual be deemed to rough to post here. We are losing sight of our goal with this cleansing of DU. I can see that happening with DU3. How did DU2 survive for so long?

We are not each others enemy. Why do we allow a few to distract us so? And it is just a few. Why do the rest of us we allow this infighting?
Making a big deal of some words sensitizes us to them. Suddenly, that is what is important. We see the word everywhere and we get focused on it. We forget what we are reading, what is being discussed. What is really important. The message itself is lost. The discussion get derailed. The thread or post gets alerted on and another trifling, shiny object gets polished to be bragged about in Meta. For what? So we can say we are better than someone else, 'cause we don't use that kinda language ourselves?
I don't normally use those "objectionable" words. I am objecting because the words on that list are in reality nothing more than a shiny object for DU to focus on while the real enemy keeps working toward its goal of total control, while we are distracted from it, with our infighting.

Leave it alone and it will go away on its own. Oh yes, it will. This constant harping among ourselves is shifting the focus of DU from the dangerous powers that be in the real world, to the mirrored chamber that DU is becoming.

Democratic Underground is not grammar school. Stop trying to make it safe for the children like it is one.

Profile Information

Gender: Male
Hometown: North Dakota
Home country: US of A
Current location: Kansas City MO
Member since: 2001
Number of posts: 25,592

About RC

It does not matter where in the political spectrum one adheres. The same rules of right and wrong, good and evil applies to everyone. Our greatest danger of extinction comes from those that think the rules do not apply to them. www.timws.com
Latest Discussions»RC's Journal