Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Octafish
Octafish's Journal
Octafish's Journal
June 18, 2013
Appearing on CNN with Howard Kurtz, Greenwald responded to criticism by Congressman Mike Rogers that he didnt know what he was talking about.
First of all, to the extent that politicians like Republican Mike Rigers are running around boating that only they know, but not the rest of us know, about what the U.S. government is doing in terms of spying on its own citizens, that to me is exactly the reason why transparency is so vital here, he said. We shouldnt have a massive spying aparatus being constructed completely beyond democratic accountability and beyond the knowledge of the citizens on whom it is spying Thats exactly why, as a journalist, I think its so vital to shine light on what it is that the government is doing.
Greenwald also responded to Rogers other claim: that hed done real damage to U.S. national security by helping reveal the widespread nature of the NSAs spying dragnet.
Every terrorist on the planet already knows, and has known for a long time, that the United States is trying to surveil their communications, eavesdrop on their telephone calls, read their emails. Any terrorist who isnt already aware of that is a terrorist incapable of tying their shoes, let alone detonating a bomb successfully in the United States. That isnt anything about what we disclosed.
What we disclosed is that the American government is surveilling its own citizens, people who are suspected of no wrongdoing, he went on. The only thing that has been damaged here is not national security. What has been damaged is the reputation and credibility of the political officials who want to hide behind top secret designations to conceal their own wrongdoing, and thats really what theyre angry about.
SOURCE: http://www.alan.com/2013/06/09/glenn-greenwald-explains-why-hiding-behind-national-security-is-bunk-and-why-we-need-transparency/
Why Hiding Behind ‘National Security’ Is Bunk And Why We Need Transparency, explains Glenn Greenwald
Appearing on CNN with Howard Kurtz, Greenwald responded to criticism by Congressman Mike Rogers that he didnt know what he was talking about.
First of all, to the extent that politicians like Republican Mike Rigers are running around boating that only they know, but not the rest of us know, about what the U.S. government is doing in terms of spying on its own citizens, that to me is exactly the reason why transparency is so vital here, he said. We shouldnt have a massive spying aparatus being constructed completely beyond democratic accountability and beyond the knowledge of the citizens on whom it is spying Thats exactly why, as a journalist, I think its so vital to shine light on what it is that the government is doing.
Greenwald also responded to Rogers other claim: that hed done real damage to U.S. national security by helping reveal the widespread nature of the NSAs spying dragnet.
Every terrorist on the planet already knows, and has known for a long time, that the United States is trying to surveil their communications, eavesdrop on their telephone calls, read their emails. Any terrorist who isnt already aware of that is a terrorist incapable of tying their shoes, let alone detonating a bomb successfully in the United States. That isnt anything about what we disclosed.
What we disclosed is that the American government is surveilling its own citizens, people who are suspected of no wrongdoing, he went on. The only thing that has been damaged here is not national security. What has been damaged is the reputation and credibility of the political officials who want to hide behind top secret designations to conceal their own wrongdoing, and thats really what theyre angry about.
SOURCE: http://www.alan.com/2013/06/09/glenn-greenwald-explains-why-hiding-behind-national-security-is-bunk-and-why-we-need-transparency/
June 17, 2013
Keeping Us in the Dark and Under Watch
Public Enemy Number One: the Public
by KEVIN CARSON
CounterPunch JUNE 17, 2013
Its important, when listening to the official shapers of opinion in the media, to ask ourselves what they really mean by the words they use. As Orwell pointed out in Politics and the English Language, those in power use language to obscure meaning more often than to convey it.
A good example is the recurrence of phrases like endangered our national security and aided the enemy, from people like Eric Holder, Peter King and Lindsey Graham, in reference to leaks by people like Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden. Now, they certainly intend to evoke certain associations in the minds of listeners with their word choices. If youre not careful, you may find yourself responding in just the way the users intend allowing their words to conjure up in your mind homes, families, neighbors, churches, a whole way of life, threatened with invasion and destruction by a nameless, faceless enemy in the words of Orwells Two-Minute Hate, the dark armies barbarians whose only honour is atrocity.
But if you look behind the words, their actual meaning is something entirely different. To the kinds of people who throw around such words, national security is a corporate-state world order enforced by the United States, run by people like themselves, which enabling global corporations to extract resources and labor from the people of the world and live off unearned rents. The enemy is you. And the danger is that you might figure out whats going on and disturb their cozy little setup.
CONTINUED...
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/17/public-enemy-number-one-the-public/
PS: When it comes to explaining power, Professor Carson is on the money.
Public Enemy Number One: the Public
Keeping Us in the Dark and Under Watch
Public Enemy Number One: the Public
by KEVIN CARSON
CounterPunch JUNE 17, 2013
Its important, when listening to the official shapers of opinion in the media, to ask ourselves what they really mean by the words they use. As Orwell pointed out in Politics and the English Language, those in power use language to obscure meaning more often than to convey it.
A good example is the recurrence of phrases like endangered our national security and aided the enemy, from people like Eric Holder, Peter King and Lindsey Graham, in reference to leaks by people like Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden. Now, they certainly intend to evoke certain associations in the minds of listeners with their word choices. If youre not careful, you may find yourself responding in just the way the users intend allowing their words to conjure up in your mind homes, families, neighbors, churches, a whole way of life, threatened with invasion and destruction by a nameless, faceless enemy in the words of Orwells Two-Minute Hate, the dark armies barbarians whose only honour is atrocity.
But if you look behind the words, their actual meaning is something entirely different. To the kinds of people who throw around such words, national security is a corporate-state world order enforced by the United States, run by people like themselves, which enabling global corporations to extract resources and labor from the people of the world and live off unearned rents. The enemy is you. And the danger is that you might figure out whats going on and disturb their cozy little setup.
CONTINUED...
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/17/public-enemy-number-one-the-public/
PS: When it comes to explaining power, Professor Carson is on the money.
June 17, 2013
Know your BFEE: Oliver North, Drug Dealer
Oliver North, the Traitor, was instrumental drug runner...
Know your BFEE: Oliver North, Drug Dealer
June 17, 2013
STASI Times.
I have watched Barack Obama transform into the security president
During his 10 years as the Observer's correspondent in America, Paul Harris has seen a new toughness from the once fiery campaigner
Paul Harris in New York
The Guardian
EXCERPT...
No one in that hall in Boston in 2004 could have imagined that the young, eloquent and inspiring politician would have transformed so dramatically less than a decade later. Yet the age of Obama is not one of hope and change; it is the era of the national security president. Obama has overseen increasing use of drones, in a targeted killing programme across the globe. No doubt they wipe out legitimate targets. But the drones also murder American citizens, such as Anwar al-Awlaki and his son Abdulraman in 2011, with no trial, amid a legal framework that again is kept largely secret. They wipe out wedding parties by accident. Any "military-aged male" in a drone strike zone is called a legitimate target, turning the innocent into the guilty to justify death from above. Then there is Guantánamo Bay, that bleeding sore on the face of American civil liberties. It is a tropical gulag of 166 men more than half cleared for release but still kept behind bars who are starving themselves out of desperation. Obama promised to close it down in 2008. He failed. He promised again last month. But nothing has happened. Meanwhile, the regime inside the camp is growing more savage.
Obama has cracked down aggressively on whistleblowers, using the Espionage Act a hangover from the first world war more times than all his predecessors combined. He has presided over an explosion of over-classification, as millions of government documents are shuttered away from public eyes. His Department of Justice has collected the phone records of AP journalists and accessed the emails of a Fox News reporter.
It's the stuff of conspiracy theorist fantasies. But these abuses of power are real and are playing out on the front pages of America's papers every day. When the IRS searched for conservative groups to target for special treatment, it confirmed the worst fears of every rightwinger in America.
How on earth did we get here from Boston 2004? Bush a cipher of a politician whose only belief was in his right to rule surrounded himself with Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, John Bolton and an army of whispering neocons. Obama does not have that excuse. When his staff meets to mull over the latest names in their killing programme an event dubbed "Terror Tuesdays" Obama himself is often present.
Neither is Obama ignorant of the law; he's a constitutional law professor. In turning America into a national security state, the awful truth is that he knows full well what he is doing.
CONTINUED...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/15/broken-promise-barack-obama
Thanks for grokking, Mnemosyne.
1984 Spirit and 2001 Technology
STASI Times.
I have watched Barack Obama transform into the security president
During his 10 years as the Observer's correspondent in America, Paul Harris has seen a new toughness from the once fiery campaigner
Paul Harris in New York
The Guardian
EXCERPT...
No one in that hall in Boston in 2004 could have imagined that the young, eloquent and inspiring politician would have transformed so dramatically less than a decade later. Yet the age of Obama is not one of hope and change; it is the era of the national security president. Obama has overseen increasing use of drones, in a targeted killing programme across the globe. No doubt they wipe out legitimate targets. But the drones also murder American citizens, such as Anwar al-Awlaki and his son Abdulraman in 2011, with no trial, amid a legal framework that again is kept largely secret. They wipe out wedding parties by accident. Any "military-aged male" in a drone strike zone is called a legitimate target, turning the innocent into the guilty to justify death from above. Then there is Guantánamo Bay, that bleeding sore on the face of American civil liberties. It is a tropical gulag of 166 men more than half cleared for release but still kept behind bars who are starving themselves out of desperation. Obama promised to close it down in 2008. He failed. He promised again last month. But nothing has happened. Meanwhile, the regime inside the camp is growing more savage.
Obama has cracked down aggressively on whistleblowers, using the Espionage Act a hangover from the first world war more times than all his predecessors combined. He has presided over an explosion of over-classification, as millions of government documents are shuttered away from public eyes. His Department of Justice has collected the phone records of AP journalists and accessed the emails of a Fox News reporter.
It's the stuff of conspiracy theorist fantasies. But these abuses of power are real and are playing out on the front pages of America's papers every day. When the IRS searched for conservative groups to target for special treatment, it confirmed the worst fears of every rightwinger in America.
How on earth did we get here from Boston 2004? Bush a cipher of a politician whose only belief was in his right to rule surrounded himself with Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, John Bolton and an army of whispering neocons. Obama does not have that excuse. When his staff meets to mull over the latest names in their killing programme an event dubbed "Terror Tuesdays" Obama himself is often present.
Neither is Obama ignorant of the law; he's a constitutional law professor. In turning America into a national security state, the awful truth is that he knows full well what he is doing.
CONTINUED...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/15/broken-promise-barack-obama
Thanks for grokking, Mnemosyne.
June 14, 2013
Hey! Who's on Dancing with the Stars?
NSA documents show 9/11 warnings shared with, and IGNORED by, Bush
From a year ago:
New NSA docs contradict Bush Administration 9-11 claims
Many of the documents publicize for the first time what was first made clear in the 9/11 Commission: The White House received a truly remarkable amount of warnings that al-Qaida was trying to attack the United States.
Hey! Who's on Dancing with the Stars?
June 14, 2013
From the guy who found what Nixon and the Pentagon were doing with 70s GESTAPO tactics and technology:
Will We Pay Attention?
Edward Snowden and the Real Issues
by CHRISTOPHER H. PYLE
CounterPunch June 13, 2013
EXCERPT...
This scandal is not just about Edward Snowden, the National Security Agency, and Snowdens profiteering bosses at Booz Allen Hamilton. It is about secret government in general, the militarization of intelligence, the privatization of governmental functions, and the role of secret campaign contributions to prevent adequate oversight of the executive branch and its pet companies.
Senator Feinstein and her colleagues dont want to admit it, but the secrecy system does not permit her and her colleagues to restrain secret government. Once they get a secret briefing, they are pledged not to discuss what they have learned, even with their staffs. Feinstein is such a weak overseer that she could not even persuade the secret FISA court to declassify its sweeping surveillance orders or the legal rationale behind them. But Mr. Snowden could do that with his leaks. He, not the senator, revealed that the secret court had, with its rubber stamp, rendered the Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonably broad seizures meaningless.
SNIP...
Since 9/11 private corporations have greatly expanded the intelligence community. Seventy percent of the communitys budget now goes to private contractors. So members of Congress, reporters, and suspected leakers are not just vulnerable to government surveillance; they are vulnerable to corporate reprisals, should their investigations or disclosures pose a threat to companies in the intelligence business. These surveillance powers can be used not only to protect secret agencies from criticism; they can be used, as General Motors once used them, to try to discredit critics like Ralph Nader.
Many people believe that they have nothing to fear from government/corporate surveillance because they have nothing to hide. But every bureaucracy is a solution in search of a problem, and if it cant find a problem to fit its solution, they will redefine the problem. In the 1960s, the surveillance bureaucracies redefined anti-war and civil rights protests as communist enterprises; today the same bureaucracies redefine anti-war Quakers, environmentalists, and animal rights activists as terrorists. So political activists, no matter how benign, have good reasons to fear these bureaucracies.
Again, most Americans do not worry, because they are not political activists, reporters, investigating legislators, or crusading attorneys general like Eliot Spitzer. Most Americans are like the Germans who did not fear the secret police because they were not Jews. But all Americans depend on reporters, leakers, and crusading legislators to keep government agencies and private corporations under control. So they should worry about government secrecy, the militarization of surveillance, the privatization of intelligence, and the role of corporate money in elections.
CONTINUED...
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/13/edward-snowden-and-the-real-issues/
PS: I read Dr. Pyle's name twice on DU earlier today.
Catherina, in 70% of the $80+ billion intel budget goes 2 private contractors not bound by constitutional amendmts.
and
H20 Man, in Intruder in the Dust.
When I saw the article, I realized it was important to share...
Edward Snowden and the Real Issues (by Christopher H. Pyle)
From the guy who found what Nixon and the Pentagon were doing with 70s GESTAPO tactics and technology:
Will We Pay Attention?
Edward Snowden and the Real Issues
by CHRISTOPHER H. PYLE
CounterPunch June 13, 2013
EXCERPT...
This scandal is not just about Edward Snowden, the National Security Agency, and Snowdens profiteering bosses at Booz Allen Hamilton. It is about secret government in general, the militarization of intelligence, the privatization of governmental functions, and the role of secret campaign contributions to prevent adequate oversight of the executive branch and its pet companies.
Senator Feinstein and her colleagues dont want to admit it, but the secrecy system does not permit her and her colleagues to restrain secret government. Once they get a secret briefing, they are pledged not to discuss what they have learned, even with their staffs. Feinstein is such a weak overseer that she could not even persuade the secret FISA court to declassify its sweeping surveillance orders or the legal rationale behind them. But Mr. Snowden could do that with his leaks. He, not the senator, revealed that the secret court had, with its rubber stamp, rendered the Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonably broad seizures meaningless.
SNIP...
Since 9/11 private corporations have greatly expanded the intelligence community. Seventy percent of the communitys budget now goes to private contractors. So members of Congress, reporters, and suspected leakers are not just vulnerable to government surveillance; they are vulnerable to corporate reprisals, should their investigations or disclosures pose a threat to companies in the intelligence business. These surveillance powers can be used not only to protect secret agencies from criticism; they can be used, as General Motors once used them, to try to discredit critics like Ralph Nader.
Many people believe that they have nothing to fear from government/corporate surveillance because they have nothing to hide. But every bureaucracy is a solution in search of a problem, and if it cant find a problem to fit its solution, they will redefine the problem. In the 1960s, the surveillance bureaucracies redefined anti-war and civil rights protests as communist enterprises; today the same bureaucracies redefine anti-war Quakers, environmentalists, and animal rights activists as terrorists. So political activists, no matter how benign, have good reasons to fear these bureaucracies.
Again, most Americans do not worry, because they are not political activists, reporters, investigating legislators, or crusading attorneys general like Eliot Spitzer. Most Americans are like the Germans who did not fear the secret police because they were not Jews. But all Americans depend on reporters, leakers, and crusading legislators to keep government agencies and private corporations under control. So they should worry about government secrecy, the militarization of surveillance, the privatization of intelligence, and the role of corporate money in elections.
CONTINUED...
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/13/edward-snowden-and-the-real-issues/
PS: I read Dr. Pyle's name twice on DU earlier today.
Catherina, in 70% of the $80+ billion intel budget goes 2 private contractors not bound by constitutional amendmts.
and
H20 Man, in Intruder in the Dust.
When I saw the article, I realized it was important to share...
June 13, 2013
CHRISTOPHER PYLE: I received a briefing at the U.S. Army Intelligence Command that showed me the extent of the surveillance system. There were about 1,500 Army agents in plain clothes watching every demonstration in the United States of 20 people or more. There was also a records system in a giant warehouse on about six million people. I disclosed the existence of that surveillance and then recruited 125 of the Armys counterintelligence agents to tell what they knew about the spying to Congress, the courts and the press...
What Sabrina1 said.
ex:CHRISTOPHER PYLE: I received a briefing at the U.S. Army Intelligence Command that showed me the extent of the surveillance system. There were about 1,500 Army agents in plain clothes watching every demonstration in the United States of 20 people or more. There was also a records system in a giant warehouse on about six million people. I disclosed the existence of that surveillance and then recruited 125 of the Armys counterintelligence agents to tell what they knew about the spying to Congress, the courts and the press...
June 13, 2013
by Alex Fitzpatrick
Mashable.com, June 5, 2013
The Obama administration may be shifting control of the country's drone program from the Central Intelligence Agency to the Pentagon, but robots can still find jobs at Langley as writers, apparently.
The CIA's venture capital wing, In-Q-Tel, has invested an unknown amount in a company called Narrative Science, which codes software capable of turning massive data sets into easy-to-read written prose, according to All Things D.
Chicago-based Narrative Science got its start by turning baseball box scores into readable accounts of games not unlike a piece you might see in your local newspaper's sports pages.
SNIP...
Despite its immediate impact in the journalism world, Narrative Science finds most of its clients in the financial services, marketing and research fields. The CIA fits into the latter category the agency collects mounds of raw data, and its researchers would most likely appreciate an automated hand in turning all those figures into readable, actionable reports for agents and higher-ups.
"Narrative Sciences artificial intelligence platform analyzes data and communicates this information in a way that is easy to read and understand," said Steve Bowsher, Managing Partner at IQT, in a press release. "We believe these advanced analytic capabilities can be of great value to our customers in the Intelligence Community."
CONTINUED...
http://mashable.com/2013/06/05/the-cia-is-investing-in-robot-writers/
As the music from Pink Floyd's "Welcome to the Machine" comes up, we realized, like the protagonist in a novel by Pierre Boulle, that we can never grow tired. So, we fight them until they quit, are beaten, or destroyed. No matter their choice, we will win.
What will they think of next?
Hiya, Hydra! Got a cunning plan that cannot fail from JackRiddler...
The CIA Invests in Robot Writersby Alex Fitzpatrick
Mashable.com, June 5, 2013
The Obama administration may be shifting control of the country's drone program from the Central Intelligence Agency to the Pentagon, but robots can still find jobs at Langley as writers, apparently.
The CIA's venture capital wing, In-Q-Tel, has invested an unknown amount in a company called Narrative Science, which codes software capable of turning massive data sets into easy-to-read written prose, according to All Things D.
Chicago-based Narrative Science got its start by turning baseball box scores into readable accounts of games not unlike a piece you might see in your local newspaper's sports pages.
SNIP...
Despite its immediate impact in the journalism world, Narrative Science finds most of its clients in the financial services, marketing and research fields. The CIA fits into the latter category the agency collects mounds of raw data, and its researchers would most likely appreciate an automated hand in turning all those figures into readable, actionable reports for agents and higher-ups.
"Narrative Sciences artificial intelligence platform analyzes data and communicates this information in a way that is easy to read and understand," said Steve Bowsher, Managing Partner at IQT, in a press release. "We believe these advanced analytic capabilities can be of great value to our customers in the Intelligence Community."
CONTINUED...
http://mashable.com/2013/06/05/the-cia-is-investing-in-robot-writers/
As the music from Pink Floyd's "Welcome to the Machine" comes up, we realized, like the protagonist in a novel by Pierre Boulle, that we can never grow tired. So, we fight them until they quit, are beaten, or destroyed. No matter their choice, we will win.
What will they think of next?
June 12, 2013
It's nothing compared to the blood on the hands of those who lied America into war.
That never washes off. And is why their 7-year long spherical eavesdropping on all Americans is so important to keep secret.
June 12, 2013
by Ray McGovern, June 12, 2013
EXCERPT...
Why would someone like Snowden, a 29-year-old employee of national-security contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, jeopardize what he calls a very comfortable life in order to blow the whistle on the U.S. governments abuse of power?
If what he did sounds weird, this is only because there are so precious few like him who will stand on principle and risk everything. Snowden explained that if the public does not know about these intrusive programs, there is no room for citizen input regarding how they square with our constitutional rights.
SNIP...
He added that he wanted to reveal the federation of secret law, unequal pardon, and irresistible executive powers that rule the world I love. What theyre doing poses an existential threat to democracy.
SNIP...
Citizens cannot make informed choices if they do not have the factsfor example, the facts that have been wrongly concealed about the ongoing war in Iraq: the real reasons behind it, the prospective costs in blood and treasure, and the setback it has dealt to efforts to stem terrorism. Administration deception and cover-up on these vital matters has so far been all too successful in misleading the public.
Many Americans are too young to remember Vietnam. Then, as now, senior government officials did not tell the American people the truth. Now, as then, insiders who know better have kept their silence, as the country was misled into the most serious foreign policy disaster since Vietnam.
CONTINUED...
http://original.antiwar.com/mcgovern/2013/06/11/another-truth-teller-steps-forward/
PS: When McGovern was a young analyst, he believed his bosses would never lie America into war. Now, he wishes he had been more, eh, aware then.
PPS: No matter which way you see things, I'm proud to be your DU brother, UTUSN.
Ray McGovern, former CIA analyst, wants to protect government whistleblowers...
Another Truth-Teller Steps Forwardby Ray McGovern, June 12, 2013
EXCERPT...
Why would someone like Snowden, a 29-year-old employee of national-security contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, jeopardize what he calls a very comfortable life in order to blow the whistle on the U.S. governments abuse of power?
If what he did sounds weird, this is only because there are so precious few like him who will stand on principle and risk everything. Snowden explained that if the public does not know about these intrusive programs, there is no room for citizen input regarding how they square with our constitutional rights.
SNIP...
He added that he wanted to reveal the federation of secret law, unequal pardon, and irresistible executive powers that rule the world I love. What theyre doing poses an existential threat to democracy.
SNIP...
Citizens cannot make informed choices if they do not have the factsfor example, the facts that have been wrongly concealed about the ongoing war in Iraq: the real reasons behind it, the prospective costs in blood and treasure, and the setback it has dealt to efforts to stem terrorism. Administration deception and cover-up on these vital matters has so far been all too successful in misleading the public.
Many Americans are too young to remember Vietnam. Then, as now, senior government officials did not tell the American people the truth. Now, as then, insiders who know better have kept their silence, as the country was misled into the most serious foreign policy disaster since Vietnam.
CONTINUED...
http://original.antiwar.com/mcgovern/2013/06/11/another-truth-teller-steps-forward/
PS: When McGovern was a young analyst, he believed his bosses would never lie America into war. Now, he wishes he had been more, eh, aware then.
PPS: No matter which way you see things, I'm proud to be your DU brother, UTUSN.
Profile Information
Gender: MaleMember since: 2003 before July 6th
Number of posts: 55,745