HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Octafish » Journal
Page: « Prev 1 ... 225 226 227 228 229 230

Octafish

Profile Information

Gender: Male
Member since: 2003 before July 6th
Number of posts: 55,745

Journal Archives

Real cause of nuclear crisis

The picture becomes clear: TEPCO blames the tsunami rather than the earthquake because making the nuclear fleet earthquake-proof is too expensive.



Real cause of nuclear crisis

SENTAKU MAGAZINE
Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2011

Tokyo Electric Power Co. (Tepco), the operator of the stricken Fukushima No. 1 Nuclear Power Station, has been insisting that the culprit that caused the nuclear crisis was the huge tsunami that hit the plant after the March 11 earthquake. But evidence is mounting that the meltdown at the nuclear power plant was actually caused by the earthquake itself.

According to a science journalist well versed in the matter, Tepco is afraid that if the earthquake were to be determined as the direct cause of the accident, the government would have to review its quake-resistance standards completely, which in turn would delay by years the resumption of the operation of existing nuclear power stations that are suspended currently due to regular inspections.

The journalist is Mitsuhiko Tanaka, formerly with Babcock-Hitachi K.K. as an engineer responsible for designing the pressure vessel for the No. 4 reactor at the ill-fated Fukushima nuclear plant.

He says if the earthquake caused the damage to the plumbing, leading to a "loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA)" in which vaporized coolant gushed into the containment building from the damaged piping, an entirely new problem "vulnerability to earthquake resistance of the nuclear reactor's core structure" would surface and that this will require a total review of the government's safety standards for nuclear power plants in Japan, which is quite frequently hit by earthquakes.

CONTINUED...

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/eo20111213a1.html

Perhaps they are betting that in the long run it won't make any difference to the ratepayers.

If it were my world, it all would all be free.



Money would not be needed. People would always be given first priority. If someone needs something they need to live -- food, water, shelter, clothing, medicine, education -- they could get it. For free.

Robots and computers can do most of the scut work now. Flying robots can build the stuff Jacques Fresco visualizes. People could be free to do the kinds of things people want to do and what they enjoy -- healthcare, farming, arts and letters, sports, gaming, entertainment, whatever floats their boat.

But, seeing how people must have money to keep track of things, OK. There could be money, just as long as it was free, too. Maybe then we can finally get past the idea that money really matters. And that people don't.

6 Shocking Revelations of Wall Street's Secret Government

Top officials willfully concealed the true extent of the 2008-'09 bailouts from Congress and the public.



http://www.alternet.org/story/153274/6_shocking_revelations_about_wall_street%27s_%22secret_government%22

Top Dollar for Top Secret kick.
Go to Page: « Prev 1 ... 225 226 227 228 229 230