Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Fozzledick
Fozzledick's Journal
Fozzledick's Journal
January 30, 2014
This appears on its face to be just more of the same old lies from the same old liars. I expect that its premeditated fraudulence will become obvious once the details of its methodology and funding are exposed.
Another candidate for The Journal of Irreproducible Results
These "reefer madness" propaganda pronouncements are consistently characterized by:
Politically biased agenda
Overt financial conflict of interests (funding from DEA or British political office)
Deliberate use of invalid methodology
Deliberate introduction of uncontrolled variables
No valid control group
Statistically insignificant sample size
Sensationalized claims made directly to tabloid press without publication in a legitimate peer reviewed journal
Sensationalized claims from a single source not confirmed by any other independent research and contradicted by previous large scale studies using valid methodology
This appears on its face to be just more of the same old lies from the same old liars. I expect that its premeditated fraudulence will become obvious once the details of its methodology and funding are exposed.
Profile Information
Member since: 2003 before July 6thNumber of posts: 3,860