Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Bernardo de La Paz
Bernardo de La Paz's Journal
Bernardo de La Paz's Journal
April 18, 2023
Who has interest in public being negative? Putin, gun shops, corruptees, media, pseudo-libertarians,
But, regardless, who defines the dimensions and weights for "getting better" and what are those used by this study?
Who has an interest in public in the West being negative?
Gun merchants. Ammo merchants.
Putin, to distract from and defund defence of Ukraine.
Authoritarians who want to take over by any means possible, i.e. Kari Lake, the rump, Boebert, Massie, et al.
Corruptees to distract and move investigative / prosecutorial resources away from fraud and racism and towards disadvantaged down-trodden drug addicts, homeless, and also some organized looting.
Pseudo-libertarians who socialize costs and privatize profits.
The media thrive on negativity. Outraged, worried people consume more media.
There are others.
April 17, 2023
Next time Poilievre asks a stupid question or as a premise to a question states a stupid talking point like "now people know that it is Trudeau propaganda, not news" ...
Trudeau should, stand up, patiently wait for the House to subside and get quiet, and then answer "Mr. Speaker, CBC is not Trudeau propaganda" and sit down.
Cons would get into an absolute uproar shouting and looking like some kind of Monty Python idiots, or worse, looking like Empty Greene and Boebert. Let them carry on their antics as long as it takes the Speaker to get in control.
Then Poilievre will re-ask the same or a similar question. Do the same thing, wait for quiet, then "Mr. Speaker, CBC is not a subsidiary of George Soros" and sit down. Keep doing it until asked civil questions.
Most CON questions will be phrased as repackaged conspiracy theories or watered down magat points or like "Have you stopped beating your wife yet". Bergen did it. Much more so under Poilievre now that he defeated the more honourable O'Toole wing of his party. So play it straight and knock down the premise in as few words as possible.
The technique is to apply negative reinforcement to nonsense and respond positively to proper questions. That negative reinforcement will drive the Cons ape-shit and they will look even more stupid. It's a corollary of your comment getting more Con con-game nonsense identified as such for the Canadian public.
Another point is Poilievre is pretending the CBC doesn't play music.
Trudeau needs to slam Poilievre with 5 words or similar to every question
Next time Poilievre asks a stupid question or as a premise to a question states a stupid talking point like "now people know that it is Trudeau propaganda, not news" ...
Trudeau should, stand up, patiently wait for the House to subside and get quiet, and then answer "Mr. Speaker, CBC is not Trudeau propaganda" and sit down.
Cons would get into an absolute uproar shouting and looking like some kind of Monty Python idiots, or worse, looking like Empty Greene and Boebert. Let them carry on their antics as long as it takes the Speaker to get in control.
Then Poilievre will re-ask the same or a similar question. Do the same thing, wait for quiet, then "Mr. Speaker, CBC is not a subsidiary of George Soros" and sit down. Keep doing it until asked civil questions.
Most CON questions will be phrased as repackaged conspiracy theories or watered down magat points or like "Have you stopped beating your wife yet". Bergen did it. Much more so under Poilievre now that he defeated the more honourable O'Toole wing of his party. So play it straight and knock down the premise in as few words as possible.
The technique is to apply negative reinforcement to nonsense and respond positively to proper questions. That negative reinforcement will drive the Cons ape-shit and they will look even more stupid. It's a corollary of your comment getting more Con con-game nonsense identified as such for the Canadian public.
Another point is Poilievre is pretending the CBC doesn't play music.
April 5, 2023
(Truth be told, the rump has been ridiculed for decades and it continues through all the periods covered by the tropes.)
The trope goes:
First they ignore you.
Then they laugh at you.
Then they attack you and try to burn you.
Then they build monuments to you.
For the rump lickers it will be:
First they lie to you.
Then they sell you merch.
Then they use you ("pro-life"
.
Then they abandon you (J6, no swamp drained).
For the rational public it will be:
First they ignored him.
Then they attacked him.
Then they convicted him.
Then they laughed at him.
Then they used him as a lesson for future generations.
The rational public will never ignore him again. He will be more infamous than even Benedict Arnold. After a couple of generations rump's cult will die. Benedict Arnold has no following in the US of A.
Yes, reverse the RW trope of "First they laugh at you, then ...
(Truth be told, the rump has been ridiculed for decades and it continues through all the periods covered by the tropes.)
The trope goes:
First they ignore you.
Then they laugh at you.
Then they attack you and try to burn you.
Then they build monuments to you.
For the rump lickers it will be:
First they lie to you.
Then they sell you merch.
Then they use you ("pro-life"
.
Then they abandon you (J6, no swamp drained).
For the rational public it will be:
First they ignored him.
Then they attacked him.
Then they convicted him.
Then they laughed at him.
Then they used him as a lesson for future generations.
The rational public will never ignore him again. He will be more infamous than even Benedict Arnold. After a couple of generations rump's cult will die. Benedict Arnold has no following in the US of A.
April 4, 2023
Ulysses S. Grant, the sitting president of the United States, was arrested in 1872
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrest_of_Ulysses_S._Grant
The time a sitting US President was arrested
Ulysses S. Grant, the sitting president of the United States, was arrested in 1872
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrest_of_Ulysses_S._Grant
Ulysses S. Grant, the sitting president of the United States, was arrested in 1872 for speeding in his horse-drawn carriage in Washington, D.C. Arresting officer William H. West later said that he had warned Grant, an avid horseman, the day before for speeding on the same street. Grant was brought to the police station, where, by West's account, he put up $20 (equivalent to $452 in 2021), which was forfeited the next day when Grant did not appear in court; other accounts differ but generally involve a fine of similar value, the impounding of the carriage, or both. West characterized Grant as polite, somewhat amused, and deferential to West's authority.
While the basic details of the event have been confirmed by the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, West's account, as published in The Sunday Star in 1908, is the sole detailed narrative, and the exact extent of its accuracy will likely never be known.[1]
While the basic details of the event have been confirmed by the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, West's account, as published in The Sunday Star in 1908, is the sole detailed narrative, and the exact extent of its accuracy will likely never be known.[1]
April 4, 2023
True believers in the cult are unreachable without some intervention or some event that is for them close to life-changing.
Counter-propaganda will keep non-believers from joining the cult and will peel away some members on the fringe.
Basically, the way the rump's cult will be dealt with is by making it ever more isolated in the extremity of its positions. This will happen naturally as he gets further held to account by the justice system. But it can be accelerated with good counter-propaganda.
The more extreme the cult is painted as, the more extreme it gets because the more isolated it gets as saner people reject them and their lunacy.
Ultimately, the political and social institutions may be strengthened by the whole impact of the rump and the ripples, but it might take more than a decade or a generation.
As J.K. Galbraith said, if you can't achieve immortality by great accomplishment, you can achieve it by spectacular failure. The rump is destined for the latter kind. History will not be kind to Donald J. Trump.
It's for non-believers and the fringes of the cult
True believers in the cult are unreachable without some intervention or some event that is for them close to life-changing.
Counter-propaganda will keep non-believers from joining the cult and will peel away some members on the fringe.
Basically, the way the rump's cult will be dealt with is by making it ever more isolated in the extremity of its positions. This will happen naturally as he gets further held to account by the justice system. But it can be accelerated with good counter-propaganda.
The more extreme the cult is painted as, the more extreme it gets because the more isolated it gets as saner people reject them and their lunacy.
Ultimately, the political and social institutions may be strengthened by the whole impact of the rump and the ripples, but it might take more than a decade or a generation.
As J.K. Galbraith said, if you can't achieve immortality by great accomplishment, you can achieve it by spectacular failure. The rump is destined for the latter kind. History will not be kind to Donald J. Trump.
April 4, 2023
You put your finger on it: the relationship. It's a cult: he hates who they hate
The Grumpy Old People party is doomed for the next 8 years or so. In 2024, the rump will be the front-runner and may even be nominated. But by that point he will be loaded down with indictments, very serious charges for things that actual patriots on the rational fringes of GOP and among independents will be incensed. So he won't win (touch wood).
If he withdraws it will be late in the race and then there will be a free-for-all of tremendous schisms and horrific name-calling and mean tweets among Republicons. The convention would be chaotic. Many magats will not vote for any non-rump nominee in the main election.
If he stays in and is not the nominee, same deal, but even more magats will not vote in the general.
In 2028, the GQP will still not have resolved its internal schisms and will not have found a backbone.
April 1, 2023
They have been lied to so much and lie to themselves, that they really think people got arrested on J6 for simple basic ordinary presence at a demonstration, peacefully protesting.
So they fear arrest at ANY simple basic protest.
But there will be idiots who will use their guns somewhere, some time, on Tuesday or after. Have courage. Be resolute.
Be confident. This is the beginning of the end of the rump.
Some idiots will take action, but most magats fear a "J6 trap"
They have been lied to so much and lie to themselves, that they really think people got arrested on J6 for simple basic ordinary presence at a demonstration, peacefully protesting.
So they fear arrest at ANY simple basic protest.
But there will be idiots who will use their guns somewhere, some time, on Tuesday or after. Have courage. Be resolute.
Be confident. This is the beginning of the end of the rump.
March 31, 2023
He was wrong on both points. His brand got a temporary boost with Saudi investors limited to during his presidency.
But once he won the nomination, he was in it to win, backed by the RepubliConning machine, Parscale, Manafort (and his connections) and sheeple.
Once he won the Electoral College, he was in it for the grift.
Now he is in it for escaping a lifetime of consequences.
I think he expected to lose the nomination 2016 and expected it to boost his brand
He was wrong on both points. His brand got a temporary boost with Saudi investors limited to during his presidency.
But once he won the nomination, he was in it to win, backed by the RepubliConning machine, Parscale, Manafort (and his connections) and sheeple.
Once he won the Electoral College, he was in it for the grift.
Now he is in it for escaping a lifetime of consequences.
March 25, 2023
Thanks for posting.
"Anti-Intellectualism in American Life": a key issue today in this increasingly technological and complex world. When human footprint on the neck of the planet is this heavy, stupid people in large numbers are dangerous as are stupid people in highest positions.
Not sure at all what to do.
Conservative websites for the conned and the Qonned are "plain sense" on meth, dressed up with the fraudulent analysis of "conservative thinkers", replete with glaring logical and factual errors and cherry picked references to credentialed quacks and crackpots.
Worth posting from time to time. Author of "Anti-Intellectualism in American Life": a key issue
Thanks for posting.
"Anti-Intellectualism in American Life": a key issue today in this increasingly technological and complex world. When human footprint on the neck of the planet is this heavy, stupid people in large numbers are dangerous as are stupid people in highest positions.
Not sure at all what to do.
Analysis
In considering the historic tension between access to education and excellence in education, Hofstadter argued that both anti-intellectualism and utilitarianism were consequences, in part, of the democratization of knowledge. Moreover, he saw these themes as historically embedded in America's national fabric, resulting from its colonial European and evangelical Protestant heritage. He contended that evangelical American Protestantism's anti-intellectual tradition valued the spirit over intellectual rigor.[5]
Definition
Hofstadter described anti-intellectualism as “resentment of the life of the mind, and those who are considered to represent it; and a disposition to constantly minimize the value of that life.”[6]
Also, he described the term as a view that "intellectuals...are pretentious, conceited... and snobbish; and very likely immoral, dangerous, and subversive ... The plain sense of the common man is an altogether adequate substitute for, if not actually much superior to, formal knowledge and expertise."[7]
In considering the historic tension between access to education and excellence in education, Hofstadter argued that both anti-intellectualism and utilitarianism were consequences, in part, of the democratization of knowledge. Moreover, he saw these themes as historically embedded in America's national fabric, resulting from its colonial European and evangelical Protestant heritage. He contended that evangelical American Protestantism's anti-intellectual tradition valued the spirit over intellectual rigor.[5]
Definition
Hofstadter described anti-intellectualism as “resentment of the life of the mind, and those who are considered to represent it; and a disposition to constantly minimize the value of that life.”[6]
Also, he described the term as a view that "intellectuals...are pretentious, conceited... and snobbish; and very likely immoral, dangerous, and subversive ... The plain sense of the common man is an altogether adequate substitute for, if not actually much superior to, formal knowledge and expertise."[7]
Conservative websites for the conned and the Qonned are "plain sense" on meth, dressed up with the fraudulent analysis of "conservative thinkers", replete with glaring logical and factual errors and cherry picked references to credentialed quacks and crackpots.
March 23, 2023
Likewise, there will be beauty in the world Saturday even if there is no indictment Friday.
Further, though the first to break the ice will certainly be very noteworthy, Bragg's case is not the main event.
Do not fret. Tomorrow will still be a good day even if there is no indictment today
Likewise, there will be beauty in the world Saturday even if there is no indictment Friday.
Further, though the first to break the ice will certainly be very noteworthy, Bragg's case is not the main event.
Profile Information
Gender: Do not displayMember since: Fri Jul 16, 2004, 11:36 PM
Number of posts: 49,001
