Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
caraher
caraher's Journal
caraher's Journal
January 8, 2012
You have to know your regulatory process is inadequate when West Virginia officials talk about how backward it is:
See no evil...
This is a disgrace. One thing I wonder, though, is what would happen if independent testing revealed a problem with one of the pollutants they're (deliberately) not testing for. Would that trigger a review of the permit?
Bear Run coal mine story in Indy Star
Looking to expand the state's lead in water pollution?Indiana has the highest amount of toxic discharges to bodies of water among all states, according to a review of 2007 federal data by the policy group Environment America, the most recent such analysis. Indiana released 27 million pounds of toxic waste into its waterways that year -- 49 percent more than the next highest state and more than 11 percent of the nation's total.
You have to know your regulatory process is inadequate when West Virginia officials talk about how backward it is:
"You're behind the times in Indiana," said Deputy Director Lewis Halstead of the Division of Mining and Reclamation at West Virginia's Department of Environmental Protection.
See no evil...
Bruno Pigott, the assistant commissioner of IDEM's Office of Water Quality, said the state also might detect problems during its occasional tests of state water bodies. And, he said, coal mines are supposed to volunteer evidence of any additional pollutants to the state.
"If they don't know about something being discharged," Pigott acknowledged, "then they can't report something."
"If they don't know about something being discharged," Pigott acknowledged, "then they can't report something."
This is a disgrace. One thing I wonder, though, is what would happen if independent testing revealed a problem with one of the pollutants they're (deliberately) not testing for. Would that trigger a review of the permit?
Profile Information
Member since: Mon Aug 9, 2004, 12:33 PMNumber of posts: 6,279