Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

babylonsister's Journal
babylonsister's Journal
November 25, 2019

Judge orders Pentagon and White House budget office to release Ukraine aid records

https://www.axios.com/judge-orders-ukraine-aid-records-released-trump-impeachment-991bd47b-2f8a-43bf-bf41-3aee3eb0a546.html?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=organic&utm_content=1100&fbclid=IwAR0-Rz3aXiRoQguSULbr3X2-plGmO0WrDPa_FinFH2Nm1P4bbblpIajC7zU


Fadel Allassan
9 mins ago
Judge orders Pentagon and White House budget office to release Ukraine aid records


A federal judge on Monday issued a preliminary injunction ordering the Department of Defense and the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to comply with a Freedom of Information Act request for records relating to the Trump administration's freeze on security aid to Ukraine.

Why it matters: Allegations that Trump froze nearly $400 million congressionally-approved military aid in order to pressure Ukraine to carry out investigations into his political rivals are at the heart of the impeachment inquiry.

Details: The 211 pages of records include communications between the Pentagon, the Pentagon's comptroller and OMB.

The judge ordered the release of half of the documents by Dec. 12 and the rest by Dec. 20.
The decision comes after the Center for Public Integrity, a nonprofit journalism organization, sued the department for the records.


What they're saying:

"Currently, the United States House of Representatives is in the process of conducting impeachment proceedings concerning the same subject matter as the documents requested by Plaintiff.. As such, the requested documents are sought in order to inform the public on a matter of extreme national concern. Only an informed electorate can develop its opinions and persuasively petition its elected officials to act in ways which further the aims of those opinions."


— Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, U.S. district judge for Washington, D.C.
November 25, 2019

Mitch McConnell's Opposition to Federal Election Security Is Hitting Home


6 hours ago
Mitch McConnell’s Opposition to Federal Election Security Is Hitting Home
Kentucky officials say local voting systems are “one emergency away from disaster.”
AJ Vincens


Don Blevins, Jr., has a lot to think about. In his job as the clerk of Fayette County, home to Lexington, the University of Kentucky, and more than 240,000 registered voters, he’s in charge of making sure elections happen securely and accurately. “There’s a lot of hand wringing over the Russians, there’s hand wringing from the far right about illegal immigrants voting and all that,” but Blevins says he’s more worried “about Americans cheating than anybody.”

Blevins cites a range of possible disruptions—from bomb threats to jamming the internet connections used to verify voter registration—that could cause long lines or deflate public confidence in the accuracy of the tally. While Blevins, a Democratic elected official, insists Fayette, the state’s second-largest county, is well resourced and equipped to securely conduct balloting, he worries about less populated regions.

“The smaller counties are in dire straits, and Kentucky for a combination of reasons,” Blevins said. “They are chronically underfunded for just basic government services, much less elections related expenses.”

Meanwhile in Washington, DC, Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky senator for the last 34 years and, as senate majority leader, Congress’ most powerful Republican, has steadfastly refused to allow meaningful election security legislation to reach the Senate floor while stymieing most related funding, arguing new laws or mandates would be an overstep of federal power.

“Mitch’s inaction is directly harming his home state,” Blevins said. “There’s no question in my mind.”


more...

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/11/mitch-mcconnell-kentucky-election-security/
November 25, 2019

SecNav's Letter of Resignation

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/11/24/1901708/-SecNav-s-Letter-of-Resignation?detail=emaildkre

SecNav's Letter of Resignation
Attorney at Arms
Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)
Sunday November 24, 2019 · 9:30 PM EST




Unfortunately it has become apparent that in this respect, I no longer share the same understanding with the Commander in Chief who appointed me, in regards to the key principle of good order and discipline. I cannot in good conscience obey an order that I believe violates the sacred oath I took in the presence of my family, my flag and my faith to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.


I don’t know the whole story here. But I know that when we start seeing high ranking officials write letters like this time and time again, there is a big problem.

I’ve covered it elsewhere, but I give the LOAC briefs (Law of Armed Conflict) where I explain to deploying soldiers that when we mistreat prisoners it hurts us because enemies willing to be taken prisoner mean less fighting and less dead Americans.

They get that even if a lot of chickenhawks think it’s “weak.”
November 25, 2019

I need a quick, easy

fresh beet recipe if anyone has a go-to. I'm ashamed to admit I've never cooked fresh ones. Seeing the benefits of eating beets convinced me I need to try.

I'm leaning toward a cold beet salad, maybe combined with oranges? Any and all suggestions welcome, and thanks!

November 24, 2019

Forget the Oval. The real Trump action is in the residence.

Forget the Oval. The real Trump action is in the residence.
Fixated on impeachment proceedings against him, Trump is increasingly taking his official business to the White House’s executive residence to escape perceived risks of his formal office space.
By NANCY COOK
11/24/2019 06:47 AM EST
Updated: 11/24/2019 08:03 AM EST


The Oval Office is the traditional epicenter of power for American presidents, but a new one is emerging that’s more exclusive, more secluded and more convenient.

President Donald Trump is increasingly morphing the White House residence into a second Oval. It’s become the place where Trump feels most productive, where he avoids meddling by his staff and where he speed-dials his network of confidantes, GOP lawmakers and TV pundits.

The residence was where Trump made the infamous July 25 phone call to the Ukrainian president that’s now at the center of impeachment proceedings. It’s where Trump often meets his personal attorneys to plot legal strategy or campaign advisers to shape 2020 campaign moves. And last week it became the location for a Trump meeting that’s as official as any, hosting Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell — the target of countless Trump twitter attacks — along with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin for a Monday morning discussion of monetary policy.

Maintaining a sanctuary to work and think has taken on greater importance for the president as he increasingly feels under siege by the Democratic impeachment inquiry. Frustrated by the whistleblower complaint and a parade of administration officials testifying on Capitol Hill, Trump is as wary as ever of the staffers around him and distrustful of the traditional White House infrastructure. Working from his private quarters gives him space away from what he perceives as prying eyes and guards against his omnipresent fear of leaks to the media.

It also gives Trump a greater sense of control as he faces the dual challenges of impeachment and his reelection, according to interviews with a half dozen current and former senior administration officials.

“The Oval presents itself as historic and it gives off a sense of power, but the residence has a sense of exclusivity,” said a former senior administration official, describing Trump’s affinity for conducting business there. “He works more in the residence because he is not constrained there by staffers knocking on the door.”


more...

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/24/trump-white-house-residence-power-epicenter-073139
November 24, 2019

This One Number Shows How Shameless Jim Jordan Is

https://crooksandliars.com/2019/11/one-number-shows-how-shameless-jim-jordan

11/23/19 12:18pm
This One Number Shows How Shameless Jim Jordan Is
If you’ve been watching the impeachment hearings, there’s a number that keeps coming up that shows how brazenly dishonest Republicans are willing to be.
By Laura Clawson


If you’ve been watching the impeachment hearings and—heaven help you—the statements House Republicans have made to the press around the hearings, there’s a number that keeps coming up that shows how brazenly dishonest Republicans are willing to be. And Rep. Jim Jordan is a particular standout.

And no, the number is not 177, the number of Ohio State University wrestlers found by an independent investigation to have been sexually abused by team doctor Richard Strauss. It’s not two, which is the number of people who say they told Jordan directly and in person about the abuse.

The number is 63 million.

As in Jordan’s claim that “Democrats never got over the fact that this new guy who’s never been in this town, never been in politics, this new guy is shaking this place up and that drives them crazy. They’ve never accepted the will of 63 million Americans, they never accepted the fact that Donald Trump won an Electoral College landslide.”

Donald Trump got nearly 63 million votes. Jordan is insisting that the will of those 63 million voters is more important than the will of the nearly 66 million people who voted for Hillary Clinton. Which, yeah, that’s the way the Electoral College works and that’s why Trump is in the White House, but it takes a special kind of nerve to act like it’s an offense against democracy to practice oversight on a president because of the number of people who voted for him when that is millions smaller than the number of people who voted against him. (Not to mention that it wasn’t an Electoral College landslide, historically speaking.)

Again: the Electoral College is the Electoral College. But 65,844,610 is still bigger than 62,979,636, and Jordan is bragging about the latter number as if it confers some kind of special, untouchable, beyond-the-reach of the rule of law status on Trump.

Shameless.

Published with permission from Daily Kos.
November 23, 2019

Senate Dem on Armed Services panel: Trump lying about CIA report on Khashoggi


Senate Dem on Armed Services panel: Trump lying about CIA report on Khashoggi
By Kate Sullivan and Zachary Cohen, CNN
Updated 12:00 PM ET, Fri November 23, 2018


Washington (CNN)The top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee on Friday accused President Donald Trump of lying about the CIA's report that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman personally ordered the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

Trump said Thursday that the CIA "did not come to a conclusion" about the crown prince's involvement in the murder.

"They have feelings certain ways, but they didn't -- I have the report," Trump said.

When asked if the President was lying about the CIA's conclusion, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Jack Reed said, "Yes. The CIA concluded that the crown prince of Saudi Arabia was directly involved in the assassination of Khashoggi."

Khashoggi, a Saudi Arabian journalist and US resident, was killed in a Saudi consulate in Istanbul last month. He was a frequent critic of the Saudi Arabian government.

"They did it, as has been reported to the press, with high confidence, which is the highest level of accuracy that they will vouch for," Reed said. "It's based on facts, it's based on analysis. The notion that they didn't reach a conclusion is just unsubstantiated. The CIA has made that clear."


more...

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/23/politics/senate-dem-armed-services-cia-khashoggi/index.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=fbCNN&utm_term=link&utm_content=2018-11-23T18%3A04%3A03&fbclid=IwAR2ltBW9YZDRQq8xGBaOTE-nJLy--hthsB9lbaDrVBcc9EEhhX1ufRJgEHw
November 23, 2019

My country: Where did it go and will I ever get it back?

https://www.airforcetimes.com/opinion/commentary/2019/11/11/my-country-where-did-it-go-and-will-i-ever-get-it-back/?fbclid=IwAR0HBCRN204WcViuttU-eMQ8xtsiGGD8xN0tlib_VLCx58MLMVxrbOw3eGc#.XdMZtnh9Yzt.facebook

Commentary
My country: Where did it go and will I ever get it back?
By: Brig. Gen. Carlos E. Martínez (ret.), USAFR ? November 11


I came to the United States from my native Cuba just before I turned 3 years of age. In keeping with the long tradition of America opening its hearts and homes to “your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free," as stated by Emma Lazarus in her famous poem, my family and I were quickly welcomed into American society.

My father was a jockey in the thoroughbred racing business, so we moved around a lot, living in Baltimore, Maryland, and Charlestown and Wheeling, West Virginia, often for no longer than a couple of months at a time. We rented furnished apartments, mostly in private homes. Everywhere we went, we were warmly welcomed, and we often returned to the same homes season after season. We eventually settled in Miami, where my father was able to purchase a permanent family home as he continued his business travels. For the next several years, however, we still made annual visits to see the family in Cuba.

On our last visit to Cuba shortly after Fidel Castro took power, my father was almost shot for voicing a complaint about the new regime. Upon our departure, he told us to take a good look out the airplane window — that we would never see Cuba again. My parents promptly petitioned for U.S. citizenship, and at age 11 I took my own solemn oath of citizenship.

While I was very proud of my Cuban heritage, I realized that the U.S. was a very different and better place. Here people always seemed to be kind and generous, the laws seemed fair, we could go about our business without interference, and we didn’t have to fear people in uniforms.

Growing up in Miami, I made good friends, learned to trick or Treat at Halloween, became a devotee of TV heroes like “Roy Rogers” and “Superman,” and even joined a Little League baseball team. As I became more and more assimilated into American society, I learned the meaning of American values through my avid reading of U.S. history and biographies of famous Americans.

America was truly a place that strove to achieve the goals set forth by Franklin D. Roosevelt during his famous “Four Freedoms Speech" in 1941: freedom of speech; freedom of worship; freedom from want; and freedom from fear.

Beginning in the 1960s, America strove to deliver on many of the goals set forth by President Roosevelt. The Civil Rights Bill was passed to eliminate many forms of discrimination; Medicare was established to provide a safety net of health care for the nation’s elderly; school lunch programs were expanded; and food stamps were created to reduce the ravages of poverty.

On a personal level, thanks to American generosity in the form of a combination of scholarships and student loans, I was able to attend college and became the first member of my family to earn a degree.

This was also a time when America not only valued, but was enthralled with science, technology and mathematics and the benefits they could offer. Many advances in medicine were developed, we were able to put a man on the moon, computing technology grew by leaps and bounds, and we eventually established the worldwide network of rapid communications and space-based navigation that we rely on so much today.

Internationally, the export of American ideals led to the replacement of many dictatorships around the world with budding democracies. Through the strength of international alliances and American perseverance, we eventually put Soviet global expansion in check. Through government and private outreach, we implemented programs to improve the lives of those in Third World countries. And, in keeping with our long traditions, we continued to hold our doors open to accept refugees from around the entire globe.

During most of these years, I had the privilege of serving our country as a member of our armed forces. When my draft number came up during the Vietnam War, I remembered my oath of citizenship from long before, and joined the Air Force to become a pilot. I served proudly, and steadily rose through the ranks, first on active duty, then as a member of the Air Force Reserve. I married an American, settled in the suburbs of Washington, D.C., and started raising a family.

Over the years that we lived in the shadows of the nation’s Capital, we watched many changes of administration — from Republican to Democrat and back. To my family and me it really did not matter which party was in charge. Our lives continued to go on — there was always an orderly transition from administration to administration, because America was a nation of laws and not of personalities. Also, while my wife and I may have had political differences with our friends and neighbors, it never got in the way of our being friends and doing things together.

That has all changed.

For the first time, I found my wife being publicly ridiculed for her political stances. My family and I were told that “we should leave the country” because I was an immigrant and didn’t really belong here. I found out that a right-wing extremist group had put a bounty on my head because of a public stand I had made on some basic human rights. It was a real shock!

On a broader scale, it has become “normal” to point to immigrants as the source of the nation’s problems, to treat children in inhumane ways, to ignore public laws, and to turn a blind eye to these deviations from our long-standing American values. We wondered what had happened to the America we had grown to know and love. Has America suddenly changed, or has something happened to remove the veneer of civility that had long permitted our nation to grow and thrive despite the differences among us?

For more than two centuries, the Great American Experiment has been held up as an ideal to the nations of the world, an ideal to which many of them have aspired. This constitutional, representative democracy ran counter to the centuries of rule by fiat by kings, military generals, despots and strong men.

Because of the natural tensions that occur among the diverse members of our American society, we have managed to keep the experiment going successfully only through our adherence to the rule of law, civility in our relations with each other, and a die-hard commitment to the common ideals that have bound us together as a nation.

The current national political atmosphere is very damaging to our values and, in turn, to the security of our nation. I fear that unless we act swiftly and determinedly, our Great Experiment could come to an end. History shows how rapidly great civilizations can unravel and meet their demise.

We are now at a crossroads. We can continue the recent pattern of un-American behavior exhibited by many, or take a step back, consider the potential consequences of such behavior, and return to civility and respect for the rule of law.

I want our country to return to the one that adopted me, the country I came to love. I hope it’s not too late to put this evil genie back in the bottle.


Retired Air Force Brig. Gen. Carlos E. Martínez is a fellow at The American College of National Security Leaders, a consortium of retired admirals, generals, ambassadors and senior government executives committed to strengthening the United States’ national security.
November 23, 2019

Shepard Smith Blasts 'Garbage & Lies Masquerading As News' In First Public Speech Since Leaving Fox

https://crooksandliars.com/2019/11/shepard-smith-blasts-garbage-and-lies?utm_source=social&utm_medium=facebook&utm_content=23798


11/23/19 9:51am
VIDEO @ LINK~
Shepard Smith Blasts ‘Garbage And Lies Masquerading As News’ In First Public Speech Since Leaving Fox News
Shepard Smith re-emerged on the pubic stage Thursday night where he took some veiled shots at Donald Trump and, possibly, Fox News – then pledged $500,000 to the Committee to Protect Journalists.
By NewsHound Ellen


Shepard Smith re-emerged on the pubic stage last night where he took some veiled shots at Donald Trump and, possibly, Fox News – then pledged $500,000 to the Committee to Protect Journalists.

According to The New York Times, Smith’s appearance at the event was arranged before he abruptly resigned from Fox News last month. The Times also reported that Fox News was a “main sponsor” of the event, that several of the network’s journalists were in attendance and that Smith made no comments about his time at Fox.

But Smith’s allusions to Trump could just as well have been aimed at his Fox News cohorts. From The Washington Post:

“Nations are becoming far less tolerant of an independent press,” Smith said. “Sure, journalists continue to be murdered or thrown in prison when they speak out, but governments have learned other, less crude, techniques to censor and stifle our work.”


“Our belief a decade ago that the online revolution would liberate us now seems a bit premature, doesn’t it?” he said with a smile. “Autocrats have learned how to use those same online tools to shore up their power. They flood the world of information with garbage and lies masquerading as news. There’s a phrase for that.”


Smith briefly paused, delivering a pointed look, which drew laughter from the audience.

Smith knows first-hand about garbage and lies masquerading as news and he fought a losing battle against them at Fox. He was also repeatedly targeted by Trump for reporting that displeased him.

Smith got a standing ovation after he announced his donation.

Watch an excerpt of Smith's remarks above, via The Washington Post.

Published with permission from News Hounds.
November 23, 2019

Biggest Takeaway From Impeachment Hearings? No, Not Trump's Guilt But Schiff's Brilliance


Biggest Takeaway From Impeachment Hearings? No, Not Trump’s Guilt But Schiff’s Brilliance
dailynooze
Friday November 22, 2019 · 9:52 AM EST


The House impeachment hearings have ended and, after a parade of witnesses, we’ve come to learn what we already knew. In the simple words of Rep. Denny Heck, “The president did it.”

It was always going to be hard to come to any other conclusion after the release of the telephone “transcript” of the conversation between Trump and Ukrainian president Zelensky. The smoking gun was never going to come out of the impeachment hearings as it was already revealed in Act One of this national tragedy.

But many did learn of something new … the impressive ability and smarts of the man chosen by Nancy Pelosi to be the face of the House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment hearings, Adam Schiff.

The Stanford graduate and Harvard-trained lawyer ran the hearings like the consummate professional that he is. He was cool, calm and collected at all times, even when Republicans on the committee tried to rattle him with useless points of order and requests. Schiff kept order over hearings that many feared could devolve into a TV spectacle; a circus.

For those who did not get the chance to see Chairman Schiff in action, here is a video of his closing statement made at today’s final public hearing (at link):

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/11/22/1901201/-Biggest-Takeaway-From-Impeachment-Hearings-No-Not-Trump-s-Guilt-But-Schiff-s-Brilliance?fbclid=IwAR0nn8FeRTkA6f4b3sWqEwlKY8XuLvl7lVFamsK3ZpwbI67r-sRBPqhse8c

Profile Information

Gender: Female
Hometown: NY
Home country: US
Current location: Florida
Member since: Mon Sep 6, 2004, 09:54 PM
Number of posts: 171,065
Latest Discussions»babylonsister's Journal