Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
mackdaddy
mackdaddy's Journal
mackdaddy's Journal
March 24, 2017
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/03/23/the-trump-administration-wants-to-kill-the-popular-energy-star-program-because-it-combats-climate-change/?utm_term=.b7912b3caf6d
The Trump administration wants to kill the ... Energy Star program because it combats climate change
Under President Trump, the Environmental Protection Agency is on the chopping block. Both the presidents proposed budget and his executive orders on cutting regulations would shrink the EPA. But of the 38 EPA programs that the Trump administration has proposed cutting, at least one is quite surprising: the popular and voluntary Energy Star program. Its not a mandatory regulation, nor a job killer. We can only assume that its on the list because its strong connection with climate change mitigation. Let us explain.
Heres what Energy Star does
Launched in 1992, Energy Star sets energy efficiency standards for appliances, electronics, and houses and buildings. But its not exactly a regulation. Businesses decide on their own whether to design products that comply with these standards.
The EPA claims that Energy Star has lowered consumers electricity bills by $430 billion (contrast this with the annual administrative cost of the program of about $57 million). This lower energy consumption has prevented 2.7 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions.
Wait, did you say voluntary regulations?
Why has the EPA created voluntary programs in the first place? Since its inception in 1970, the EPAs task has been enforcing key federal environmental laws. Business and some labor groups have accused these laws and the EPAs enforcement of them of being heavy-handed and overly rigid. Opponents allege that EPA regulations make U.S. firms uncompetitive, giving them incentives to relocate to countries with less stringent regulations. In this job-versus-environment narrative, federal regulations are blamed for the decline of U.S. manufacturing and the emergence of the Rust Belt.
Continued....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/03/23/the-trump-administration-wants-to-kill-the-popular-energy-star-program-because-it-combats-climate-change/?utm_term=.b7912b3caf6d
Profile Information
Member since: Tue Nov 16, 2004, 01:43 AMNumber of posts: 1,530