Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Arkansas Granny
Arkansas Granny's Journal
Arkansas Granny's Journal
January 13, 2017
Can you believe it has come to this?
Human Rights Group Portrays U.S. as Major Threat, Citing Trump
WASHINGTON Human Rights Watch on Thursday released its annual report on threats to human rights around the world, and for the first time in the 27 years it has done these surveys, the United States is one of the biggest. The reason: the rise of Donald J. Trump.
Eight days before Mr. Trump is to be sworn in as president, the human-rights advocacy group declared that his path to power, in a campaign marked by misogynistic, xenophobic and racist rhetoric, could cause tremendous harm to vulnerable communities, contravene the United States core human rights obligations, or both.
---
But Kenneth Roth, the organizations executive director, said in an interview: This is a more fundamental threat to human rights than George Bush after 9/11. I see Trump treating human rights as a constraint on the will of the majority in a way that Bush never did.
Mr. Roth cited a familiar list of policies Mr. Trump embraced during the campaign: mass deportations of unauthorized immigrants, a ban on Muslims entering the United States, and an openness to reintroducing techniques like waterboarding. Mr. Trump has since expressed second thoughts about torture, after a meeting with Gen. James N. Mattis, his nominee for defense secretary, who told him it was ineffective.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/us/politics/human-rights-watch-trump.html?smid=tw-share
Eight days before Mr. Trump is to be sworn in as president, the human-rights advocacy group declared that his path to power, in a campaign marked by misogynistic, xenophobic and racist rhetoric, could cause tremendous harm to vulnerable communities, contravene the United States core human rights obligations, or both.
---
But Kenneth Roth, the organizations executive director, said in an interview: This is a more fundamental threat to human rights than George Bush after 9/11. I see Trump treating human rights as a constraint on the will of the majority in a way that Bush never did.
Mr. Roth cited a familiar list of policies Mr. Trump embraced during the campaign: mass deportations of unauthorized immigrants, a ban on Muslims entering the United States, and an openness to reintroducing techniques like waterboarding. Mr. Trump has since expressed second thoughts about torture, after a meeting with Gen. James N. Mattis, his nominee for defense secretary, who told him it was ineffective.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/us/politics/human-rights-watch-trump.html?smid=tw-share
Can you believe it has come to this?
January 13, 2017
Is this the dawning of a new authoritarian government practice? Criticize the DT and you will be investigated.
G.O.P. Lawmaker Hints at Investigating Ethics Chief Critical of Trump
The Republican chairman of the House Oversight Committee on Thursday issued a stern letter, including a veiled threat of an investigation, to the federal governments top ethics monitor, who this week had questioned President-elect Donald J. Trumps commitment to confront his potential conflicts of interest.
In an unusual action against the independent Office of Government Ethics, Representative Jason Chaffetz of Utah accused the offices director, Walter M. Shaub Jr., of blurring the line between public relations and official ethics guidance.
He cited a bizarre series of Twitter posts that the office made in late November congratulating Mr. Trump for divesting from his business even though Mr. Trump had made no such commitment. Mr. Chaffetz also said that the office had failed to adequately investigate Hillary Clinton, based on allegations that she had not properly disclosed fees paid for speeches she gave after leaving her post as secretary of state.
Mr. Chaffetzs letter made no mention of Mr. Shaubs airing of doubts a day earlier about Mr. Trumps ethics plan, which includes retaining his own stake in his business empire and putting it in a trust managed by his two adult sons. Mr. Shaub, during an unusual news conference at the Brookings Institution, a policy research center in Washington, said that Mr. Trump had not gone far enough and would leave himself susceptible to suspicions of corruption.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/13/us/politics/rep-jason-chaffetz-ethics-monitor-investigation-threat.html?action=click&contentCollection=us&module=NextInCollection®ion=Footer&pgtype=article&version=newsevent&rref=collection%2Fnews-event%2Fdonald-trump-white-house
In an unusual action against the independent Office of Government Ethics, Representative Jason Chaffetz of Utah accused the offices director, Walter M. Shaub Jr., of blurring the line between public relations and official ethics guidance.
He cited a bizarre series of Twitter posts that the office made in late November congratulating Mr. Trump for divesting from his business even though Mr. Trump had made no such commitment. Mr. Chaffetz also said that the office had failed to adequately investigate Hillary Clinton, based on allegations that she had not properly disclosed fees paid for speeches she gave after leaving her post as secretary of state.
Mr. Chaffetzs letter made no mention of Mr. Shaubs airing of doubts a day earlier about Mr. Trumps ethics plan, which includes retaining his own stake in his business empire and putting it in a trust managed by his two adult sons. Mr. Shaub, during an unusual news conference at the Brookings Institution, a policy research center in Washington, said that Mr. Trump had not gone far enough and would leave himself susceptible to suspicions of corruption.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/13/us/politics/rep-jason-chaffetz-ethics-monitor-investigation-threat.html?action=click&contentCollection=us&module=NextInCollection®ion=Footer&pgtype=article&version=newsevent&rref=collection%2Fnews-event%2Fdonald-trump-white-house
Is this the dawning of a new authoritarian government practice? Criticize the DT and you will be investigated.
January 13, 2017
It still chaps his ass that Hillary won the popular vote .
Twitter is on a roll this morning.
1h
Donald J. Trump? @realDonaldTrump
What are Hillary Clinton's people complaining about with respect to the F.B.I. Based on the information they had she should never.....
1h
Donald J. Trump? @realDonaldTrump
have been allowed to run - guilty as hell. They were VERY nice to her. She lost because she campaigned in the wrong states - no enthusiasm!
Donald J. Trump? @realDonaldTrump
What are Hillary Clinton's people complaining about with respect to the F.B.I. Based on the information they had she should never.....
1h
Donald J. Trump? @realDonaldTrump
have been allowed to run - guilty as hell. They were VERY nice to her. She lost because she campaigned in the wrong states - no enthusiasm!
It still chaps his ass that Hillary won the popular vote .
January 11, 2017
Well, he never answered when asked if he or his people had contact with Russia
during the campaign. He just ignored that part of the question.
One intrepid reporter repeatedly asked him to answer as he was leaving the podium, but to no avail.
January 11, 2017
Does anyone know of a site to live stream DT's press conference today?
Working, so no access to tv.
January 10, 2017
I don't expect things will get any better as his fans realize just what they voted into office.
This new poll has all kinds of bad news for Donald Trump
As honeymoons go, Donald Trumps wasnt much to write home about. He was voted in as the most unpopular president-elect in modern history and got slightly less unpopular in the weeks that followed, as the goodwill flowed. Even then, though, he clearly remained the most unpopular president-elect in modern history. Again, that was the honeymoon.
And now its over.
------
Quinnipiac is the first high-quality pollster to poll on Trump twice since the election. And while its poll in late November showed his favorable rating rising from 34 percent to 44 percent, that number has dropped back to 37 percent, which is about where it stood for much of the campaign. Thats tied for Trumps worst favorable rating in a poll since his election. And a majority 51 percent now have an unfavorable view of him.
Likewise, the Quinnipiac poll shows a drop in confidence in Trump across the board. Although 59 percent were optimistic about the next four years under Trump in November, today that number is 52 percent. While 41 percent thought he would be a better leader than President Obama, its now 34 percent. While 52 percent thought he would help the nation's economy, its now 47 percent. While 40 percent thought his policies would help their personal financial situation, its now 27 percent. While 53 percent thought hed take the country in the right direction, its now 45 percent.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/01/10/this-new-poll-has-all-kinds-of-bad-news-for-donald-trump/?tid=sm_tw_pp&utm_term=.8c5561ac0f7d&wprss=rss_the-fix
And now its over.
------
Quinnipiac is the first high-quality pollster to poll on Trump twice since the election. And while its poll in late November showed his favorable rating rising from 34 percent to 44 percent, that number has dropped back to 37 percent, which is about where it stood for much of the campaign. Thats tied for Trumps worst favorable rating in a poll since his election. And a majority 51 percent now have an unfavorable view of him.
Likewise, the Quinnipiac poll shows a drop in confidence in Trump across the board. Although 59 percent were optimistic about the next four years under Trump in November, today that number is 52 percent. While 41 percent thought he would be a better leader than President Obama, its now 34 percent. While 52 percent thought he would help the nation's economy, its now 47 percent. While 40 percent thought his policies would help their personal financial situation, its now 27 percent. While 53 percent thought hed take the country in the right direction, its now 45 percent.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/01/10/this-new-poll-has-all-kinds-of-bad-news-for-donald-trump/?tid=sm_tw_pp&utm_term=.8c5561ac0f7d&wprss=rss_the-fix
I don't expect things will get any better as his fans realize just what they voted into office.
January 9, 2017
https://twitter.com/SenSchumer
About those cabinet appointees. Found this on Chuck Shumer's twitter page.
https://twitter.com/SenSchumer
January 7, 2017
This is very troubling, especially in light of their recent efforts to eliminate the Office of Congressional Ethics.
Ethics office accuses GOP of rushing Trump Cabinet confirmations
The director of the federal Office of Government Ethics on Saturday accused Senate Republicans of rushing confirmations for nominees in President-elect Donald Trump's administration.
In a letter to leading Senate Democrats, Walter Shaub, Jr., the ethics office director, said the busy hearing schedule had overwhelmed his office. He said it had not completed ethics screening reviews on several nominees, which he described as a concern.
---
Shaubs letter to the senators comes just days before the Senate is set to hold a flurry of confirmation hearings beginning on Tuesday. In the letter, Shaub said that the schedule could leave some nominees with potentially unknown or unresolved ethics issues.
I am not aware of any occasion in the four decades since OGE was established when the Senate held a confirmation hearing before the nominee had completed the ethics review process, he said.
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/313175-ethics-office-accuses-gop-of-rushing-trump-cabinet-confirmations
In a letter to leading Senate Democrats, Walter Shaub, Jr., the ethics office director, said the busy hearing schedule had overwhelmed his office. He said it had not completed ethics screening reviews on several nominees, which he described as a concern.
---
Shaubs letter to the senators comes just days before the Senate is set to hold a flurry of confirmation hearings beginning on Tuesday. In the letter, Shaub said that the schedule could leave some nominees with potentially unknown or unresolved ethics issues.
I am not aware of any occasion in the four decades since OGE was established when the Senate held a confirmation hearing before the nominee had completed the ethics review process, he said.
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/313175-ethics-office-accuses-gop-of-rushing-trump-cabinet-confirmations
This is very troubling, especially in light of their recent efforts to eliminate the Office of Congressional Ethics.
January 5, 2017
Pay to play. They aren't even trying to hide it anymore. When does it end?
Florida Attorney General Bondi Said to Have Job Under Trump
Florida attorney general Pam Bondi, who came under scrutiny last year for her offices dealings with Trump University and President-elect Donald Trump, will take a job in Trumps White House, according to a person familiar with the decision.
It was not immediately clear what her title would be. Bondi was not among a lengthy list of White House appointments Trump announced on Wednesday.
A Washington watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, filed a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service last year charging that Trumps charitable foundation violated its tax-exempt status by making a $25,000 donation to a political group associated with Bondi in 2013. Bondi later decided not to pursue claims by Florida residents that Trump University had defrauded them.
Trumps foundation paid a $2,500 fine to the IRS last year for the donation to the Bondi-connected group. At the time of its complaint CREWs board was led by David Brock, who ran two super-PACs backing Democrat Hillary Clinton, Trumps general election opponent.
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-01-05/florida-attorney-general-bondi-said-to-have-job-under-trump
It was not immediately clear what her title would be. Bondi was not among a lengthy list of White House appointments Trump announced on Wednesday.
A Washington watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, filed a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service last year charging that Trumps charitable foundation violated its tax-exempt status by making a $25,000 donation to a political group associated with Bondi in 2013. Bondi later decided not to pursue claims by Florida residents that Trump University had defrauded them.
Trumps foundation paid a $2,500 fine to the IRS last year for the donation to the Bondi-connected group. At the time of its complaint CREWs board was led by David Brock, who ran two super-PACs backing Democrat Hillary Clinton, Trumps general election opponent.
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-01-05/florida-attorney-general-bondi-said-to-have-job-under-trump
Pay to play. They aren't even trying to hide it anymore. When does it end?
January 4, 2017
Part 1 Russian meddling doubters should wait to see report, says Brennan.
PBS interview with John Brennan, CIA director.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/russian-meddling-doubters-wait-see-report-says-brennan/
Part two will be on PBS News Hour Wed night.
Profile Information
Gender: FemaleHometown: Arkansas
Home country: USA
Member since: Thu Jan 13, 2005, 04:13 PM
Number of posts: 31,535