Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

unhappycamper's Journal
unhappycamper's Journal
July 10, 2013

Obama's 'zero option' on AfPak is viable

http://atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/SOU-01-100713.html



Obama's 'zero option' on AfPak is viable
Jul 10, '13
By M K Bhadrakumar

The Clausewitzean fog of war is thickening in the Hindu Kush. The New York Times reported over the weekend that President Barack Obama is seriously considering a "zero option" for Afghanistan, namely, a total pullout of American troops by end-2014 - lock, stock and barrel, as they say.

~snip~

In the US perception, what lends credence to such an interpretation of Karzai's motives is that the preparations for the 2014 poll are already falling behind and he does not seem to be in any hurry.

Obama likely intended the threat of "zero option" as a "shock therapy" to Karzai so that he falls in line. But, on the other hand, this could be more than a mere "psywar" and Obama could be dead serious about the "zero option". The point is, a few thousands US troops can and will stay in Afghanistan only if the SOFA is in place.

~snip~

In sum, the problem Obama is grappling with is that he is pushing the US' geopolitical agenda, whereas Karzai's priority lies in the stabilization of his country. Obama's "zero option" message means the following: "Allow us to have nine military bases, or else we will quit and leave you to the wolf."

Profile Information

Member since: Wed Mar 16, 2005, 11:12 AM
Number of posts: 60,364
Latest Discussions»unhappycamper's Journal