dajoki
dajoki's JournalReporting directly to Donald Trump's personal lawyer, two operators waged a brazen
Two Unofficial US Operatives Reporting To Trumps Lawyer Privately Lobbied A Foreign Government In A Bid To Help The President Win In 2020
Reporting directly to Donald Trumps personal lawyer, two operators waged a brazen back-channel campaign that could thrust another foreign country to the center of the next US election.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/mikesallah/rudy-giuliani-ukraine-trump-parnas-fruman
Two unofficial envoys reporting directly to Donald Trumps personal lawyer have waged a remarkable back-channel campaign to discredit the presidents rivals and undermine the special counsels inquiry into Russian meddling in US elections.
In a whirlwind of private meetings, Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman who pumped hundreds of thousands of dollars into Republican campaigns and dined with the president gathered repeatedly with top officials in Ukraine and set up meetings for Trump's attorney, Rudy Giuliani, as they turned up information that could be weaponized in the 2020 presidential race.
The two men urged prosecutors to investigate allegations against the Democratic frontrunner Joe Biden. And they pushed for a probe into accusations that Ukrainian officials plotted to rig the 2016 election in Hillary Clintons favor by leaking evidence against Paul Manafort, Trumps campaign chair, in what became a cornerstone of the special counsels inquiry.
They also waged an aggressive campaign in the United States, staying at the Trump International Hotel in Washington, DC, and meeting with key members of Congress as they joined in a successful push that led to the removal of the ambassador to Ukraine, after she angered their allies in Kiev.
Meanwhile, the two men who both have troubled financial histories rose to prominence in Republican circles, meeting with party leaders while injecting hundreds of thousands of dollars into top Republican committees and dozens of candidates campaigns.
<<snip>>
Have a seat. This is upsetting
https://twitter.com/WritesTruths/status/1150210979839565824https://twitter.com/WritesTruths/status/1150210993299099680
https://twitter.com/WritesTruths/status/1150213073887617025
https://twitter.com/WritesTruths/status/1150215451512889344
https://twitter.com/WritesTruths/status/1150218171439308800
https://twitter.com/WritesTruths/status/1150227503753113600
YES, COLLUSION Mueller Missed the Crime: Trump's Campaign Coordinated With Russia
YES, COLLUSION
Mueller Missed the Crime: Trumps Campaign Coordinated With Russia
The special counsel will testify before Congress next week. He needs to answer for historic legal and factual errors.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/robert-mueller-missed-the-crime-trumps-campaign-coordinated-with-russia
Ever since the release of the Mueller Report, countless commentators have implored everyone to just #ReadtheReport. The problem is not who is reading itthe problem is the report itself, and its many errors.
Robert Mueller made a significant legal error and erroneously cleared President Donald Trump and his campaign of wrongdoing on campaign coordination with Russia. Muellers errors meant that, first, he failed to conclude that the Trump campaign criminally coordinated with Russia; second, he failed to indict campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his deputy Rick Gates for felony campaign coordination (see in a concise timeline below); third, the 10 acts of felony obstruction in Volume II fell flat among the general public because it lacked compelling context of these underlying crimes between the campaign and Russia. On top of these errors, the former special counsel said he deliberately wrote the report to be unclear because it would be unfair to make clear criminal accusations against a president.
The bottom line is that the Mueller Report is a failure not because of Congress or because of public apathy, but because it failed to get the law, the facts, or even the basics of writing right. When Mueller testifies before Congress on July 17, he should be pressed on all of this.
The DOJs initial appointment explicitly tasked Mueller with investigating campaign coordination, and it is not too much to ask that he get the law of coordination right. The report stated that coordination does not have a settled definition in federal criminal law. We understood coordination to require an agreementtacit or express.
However, Congress purposely sought to prevent such narrow interpretations: in 2002, it passed a statute directing that campaign finance regulations shall not require agreement or formal collaboration to establish coordination. The Federal Election Commission established the regulations for the implementation of the statute: Coordinated means made in cooperation, consultation or concert with, or at the request or suggestion of, a candidate, with no need to show any kind of agreement.
Outside spending for coordinated communications is an in-kind contribution, and foreign contributions are completely prohibited. And Congress made the criminal penalties unmistakably clear: Any person who knowingly and willfully commits a violation of any provision of this Act commits a crime. The Supreme Court upheld these limits in McConnell v. FEC with crucial observations about the functional role of suggestions, rather than agreements: [E]xpenditures made after a wink or nod often will be as useful to the candidate as cash. This timeline is full of suggestions far more explicit than winks and nods.
As the Supreme Court acknowledged, this is not about bribery and quid pro quo; its about outsourcing a consistent campaign messaging and expenses to known allies. It seems Mueller did not hire any legal experts with experience in campaign finance regulation. Given that this investigation was about campaign crimes, this appears to a revealing oversight with serious consequences.
In addition to ignoring these rules, Mueller also made a major organizational error: Volume I separates the events of Russian hacking from the actions of the Trump campaign. The entire point of a conspiracy and coordination investigation was the relationship between the two. The ongoing pattern of signal or invitation with response, of cause-and-effect, gets utterly lost in the hundreds of pages of details, the siloing of each character, and especially in the omissions and the errors.
<<snip>>
Profile Information
Gender: MaleHome country: USA
Current location: PA
Member since: Wed May 11, 2005, 10:48 PM
Number of posts: 10,678