seabeckind
seabeckind's JournalThe question isn't "should we" but "how will we"
Of course we should. Anyone who disagrees doesn't know the history of electricity in this country and what it did for our economy and way of life.
But, as I posted above and in a different thread, the devil is in the details. In order to accomplish this vision, we must break the stranglehold corporations have over our infrastructure (yes, broadband is infrastructure). Those corporations make all their profit on the current system. When they look at all of us using something other than their velvet chains, they will fight it.
President Obama promised this same thing and then bumped up against the corporations. Those same corporations that were handed the keys to the gov't by Reagan. Ironic that Reagan broke up AT&T.
Repeated from above:
The United States must lead the world in the number of homes and people with access to affordable, world-class broadband connections. As such, 100 million U.S. homes should have affordable access to actual download speeds of at least 100 Mbps and actual upload speeds of at least 50 Mbps by 2020. This will create the worlds most attractive market for broadband applications, devices and infrastructure.
...
US Ignite points in the right direction, an effort to build-out the nations wireline infrastructure. But his well-intentioned and farsighted effort confronts, head-on, the nations telecom giants, the telephone and cable companies led by AT&T, Verizon, throw in Comcast and the other cable companies, who have a very different and self-serving agenda. Working together they are a Communications Trust, a cartel of companies who have taken control of communications so that they can get rid of regulations, raise rates and block competition.
But the real story is the massive skunkworks campaigns on both the state level, such as what happening in state legislatures, and at the federal level, including the FCC and Congress, to close down all wired services, including the Public Switched Telephone Networks, (PSTN) or DSL service, (which relies on the copper wiring) or even the obligation to provide wireline services in rural areas or where ever they dont want to serve. At the same time, Verizon and AT&T have been privatizing other parts of the PSTN, such as the advanced services like FiOS or U-Verse, or the profitable business or data services, which use the PSTN wires and plant - which have been directly funded by phone customers, many times through rate increases for infrastructure building.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-kushnick/broadband-communications-att-verizon_b_1621871.html
Asked and answered in a different thread
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1017&pid=350504
Take the exchange getting the most attention: Sanders supposed inability to describe exactly how he would break up the biggest banks. Sanders said that if the Treasury Department deemed it necessary to do so, the bank would go about unwinding itself as it best saw fit to get to a size that the administration considered no longer a systemic risk to the economy. Sanders said this could be done with new legislation, or through administrative authority under Dodd-Frank.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-daily-news_us_5704779ce4b0a506064d8df5
TRANSCRIPT: Bernie Sanders meets with the Daily News Editorial Board, April 1, 2016
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/transcript-bernie-sanders-meets-news-editorial-board-article-1.2588306
"progressive ideas have a broad popularity"
Yes, they do. And they are implemented when the people speak to the entrenched power base.
This is from an earlier RS article:
(SNIP)
The bigger question facing Sanders, whatever you think about the merits of his ideas, is how he would ever possibly implement them, assuming he's not elected along with a Democratic sweep of both houses of Congress. Sanders, on the stump, praises President Obama for running a brilliant campaign in 2008. But then he goes on to say that the president's biggest mistake ("and I had the opportunity to tell him this I'm not sure how happy he was to hear it, but that's what I do!" was to demobilize his millions of passionate supporters after Election Day: "Politics in Washington is not about a president sitting down with Mitch McConnell or John Boehner and having a drink [and] trying to work it out that's just media nonsense. You guys want free tuition at public colleges and universities? You bring a million of your friends to march on Washington, D.C.!"
Sanders insists that the nation is less polarized than it is portrayed in the mainstream media. Through the Obama years, the Democratic Party's strategy has been to specifically target the so-called coalition of the ascendant young people, minorities, college-educated women by heightening contradictions with the GOP on issues like immigration, LGBT rights, overpolicing and abortion.
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/weekend-with-bernie-sanders-20150709#ixzz43l0QCylQ
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
"Through the Obama years, the Democratic Party's strategy has been to specifically target the so-called coalition of the ascendant young people, minorities, college-educated women "
And then promptly forgets the promises -- until the next election or fundraising letter.
Got one of those today from DWS. Time to send off another $50 to Bernie.
Profile Information
Gender: MaleHometown: Indiana
Home country: USA
Current location: Indianapolis
Member since: Thu Dec 8, 2005, 10:45 PM
Number of posts: 1,957