Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

damonm

damonm's Journal
damonm's Journal
March 5, 2012

Republicans better for business? Bloomberg doesn't think so...

From Bloomberg, we can easily discern that Democratic presidents correlate to a higher DOW, i.e., higher stock market profits for investors.


While Republicans promote themselves as the friendliest party for Wall Street, stock investors do better when Democrats occupy the White House. From a dollars- and-cents standpoint, it’s not even close.


The BGOV Barometer shows that, over the five decades since John F. Kennedy was inaugurated, $1,000 invested in a hypothetical fund that tracks the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SPX) only when Democrats are in the White House would have been worth $10,920 at the close of trading yesterday.


That’s more than nine times the dollar return an investor would have realized from following a similar strategy during Republican administrations. A $1,000 stake invested in a fund that followed the S&P 500 under Republican presidents, starting with Richard Nixon, would have grown to $2,087 on the day George W. Bush left office.


See it all at http://www.politicalruminations.com/2012/02/investors-reap-higher-returns-under-democratic-presidents.html
January 5, 2012

Why the ACA is the death knell of for-profit health insurance

Whether you are a believer in the benefits of single-payer health coverage or an opponent, mark this year down on your calendar because this is the year seismic shifts in our health care system finally begin. If you thought that the Obama Administration wussed out on pushing the nation in the direction of universal health care for everyone, today is the day you begin to understand that the reality is quite the contrary.
(snip)

The medical loss ratio requires health insurance companies to spend 80% of the consumers’ premium dollars they collect—85% for large group insurers—on actual medical care rather than overhead, marketing expenses and profit. If they fail to do so, the insurers will have to send their customers a rebate check representing the amount in which was left unspent on actual medical care. This one item will have more impact on the future of how medical care is paid for in this country than anything I’ve ever seen. This aspect of the law represents that which will ultimately lead to the demise of large parts of the private, for-profit health insurance industry. Why? Because there is virtually no way for-profit health insurers are going to be able to learn how to get by and still make a profit while being forced to spend at least 80 percent of their receipts providing their customers with the coverage for which they paid. If they could, we likely would never have seen the extraordinary efforts made by these companies to avoid paying benefits to their customers at the very moment they need it the most.


Full article at: http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/01/04/obamacare-is-already-helping-the-99-now/

Profile Information

Member since: Thu Feb 7, 2008, 04:52 PM
Number of posts: 2,655
Latest Discussions»damonm's Journal