Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
aaaaaa5a
aaaaaa5a's Journal
aaaaaa5a's Journal
July 26, 2012
This is from (R)asumssen:
Obama 50
Romney 45
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/nevada/election_2012_nevada_president
New Poll: Obama +5 in Nevada
This is from (R)asumssen:
Obama 50
Romney 45
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/nevada/election_2012_nevada_president
July 25, 2012
Whats also important, but not evident, on this chart is that Obamas major expenses were temporary the stimulus is over now while Bushs were, effectively, recurring. The Bush tax cuts didnt just lower revenue for 10 years. Its clear now that they lowered it indefinitely, which means this chart is understating their true cost. Similarly, the Medicare drug benefit is costing money on perpetuity, not just for two or three years. And Boehner, Ryan and others voted for these laws and, in some cases, helped to craft and pass them.
To relate this specifically to the debt-ceiling debate, were not raising the debt ceiling because of the new policies passed in the past two years. Were raising the debt ceiling because of the accumulated effect of policies passed in recent decades, many of them under Republicans. Its convenient for whichever side isnt in power, or wasnt recently in power, to blame the debt ceiling on the other party. But it isnt true.
Full story at link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/obamas-and-bushs-effect-on-the-deficit-in-one-graph/2011/07/25/gIQAELOrYI_blog.html?fb_ref=NetworkNews
The deficit: Bush vs Obama in one graph by the Washington Post
Whats also important, but not evident, on this chart is that Obamas major expenses were temporary the stimulus is over now while Bushs were, effectively, recurring. The Bush tax cuts didnt just lower revenue for 10 years. Its clear now that they lowered it indefinitely, which means this chart is understating their true cost. Similarly, the Medicare drug benefit is costing money on perpetuity, not just for two or three years. And Boehner, Ryan and others voted for these laws and, in some cases, helped to craft and pass them.
To relate this specifically to the debt-ceiling debate, were not raising the debt ceiling because of the new policies passed in the past two years. Were raising the debt ceiling because of the accumulated effect of policies passed in recent decades, many of them under Republicans. Its convenient for whichever side isnt in power, or wasnt recently in power, to blame the debt ceiling on the other party. But it isnt true.
Full story at link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/obamas-and-bushs-effect-on-the-deficit-in-one-graph/2011/07/25/gIQAELOrYI_blog.html?fb_ref=NetworkNews
July 25, 2012
Michigan is not a battleground state. PA is holding firm.
Michigan 53/39
Pennsylvania 49/43
Additional Findings:
There are a couple common themes driving Obama's success in these states. The biggest is his competitiveness with white voters. He actually leads 48-44 with them in Michigan, and he just narrowly trails 46-45 with them in Pennsylvania. Given the healthy sized African American populations in both those states anything close to a split with white voters will give Obama an easy victory. Obama is also benefiting from a huge lead with women in both states, 59-33 in Michigan and 54-37 in Pennsylvania, which helps him offset a closer race with men. And he has the upper hand with independents in both states, 50-37 in Michigan and 46-39 in Pennsylvania.
More at link:
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/07/obama-leads-in-michigan-and-pennsylvania.html
New Poll. Obama +14 in Michigan, Obama +6 in Pennsylvania
Michigan is not a battleground state. PA is holding firm.
Michigan 53/39
Pennsylvania 49/43
Additional Findings:
There are a couple common themes driving Obama's success in these states. The biggest is his competitiveness with white voters. He actually leads 48-44 with them in Michigan, and he just narrowly trails 46-45 with them in Pennsylvania. Given the healthy sized African American populations in both those states anything close to a split with white voters will give Obama an easy victory. Obama is also benefiting from a huge lead with women in both states, 59-33 in Michigan and 54-37 in Pennsylvania, which helps him offset a closer race with men. And he has the upper hand with independents in both states, 50-37 in Michigan and 46-39 in Pennsylvania.
More at link:
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/07/obama-leads-in-michigan-and-pennsylvania.html
July 7, 2012
The video speaks for itself.
Mitt Romney talking about turning an economy around.
&feature=player_embeddedThe video speaks for itself.
Profile Information
Member since: Tue Apr 8, 2008, 08:20 PMNumber of posts: 4,667