December 31, 2013

Liberals United Front Paged - "Mitt Romney Being Sued for Racketeering in Federal Court"

Apparently, yours truly made a faux pas of sorts in making the title of the case "Romney Sued for RICO in Fed Court". In the effort of brevity (utilizing "RICO" instead of "Racketeering&quot , the story gets mixed up with all the banter on how Romney purportedly dominated Puerto Rico.

To the rescue of that issue comes a veteran journalist Ann Werner from the 24-Hour Online New Magazine LIBERALS UNITE (and - in some manner - linked to Samuel-Warde.com). Instead of utilizing the word RICO, reporter Ann Werner titled her piece "Mitt Romney Being Sued for Racketeering in Federal Court".

Reporter Ann Werner is planning on thoroughly investigating my allegations; and reached out to me via social media. She has now registered on PACER (Public Access Court Electronic Records) and plans to get expert opinions on the matter.

GOOD!

Romney needs the darkness, corruption and his power, money, might makes right to assure he defeats the message. All I need is just one person of worth, to say this case has a chance. Then the dominos shall fall.

Meanwhile, I really like Ann Werner's photoshop pic.

?resize=359%2C197

[br][hr][br]
By the way - Press Release due out today - on my rebuttal points to the Dept. of Justice's US Trustee letter.

Please stay tuned!

December 20, 2013

Update - News Break - Judge issues Order in "Haas v Romney" that's telltale!

He who has eyes to see and cares how integrity be;
look and consider - why I'm a happy me!

http://petters-fraud.com/dec18_2013_court_deny_fed_marshal_service.pdf



Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS ORDER Denying Plaintiff’s Request for Service by United States Marshal

emphasis added
[br][hr][br]

UPDATE - 1

BACKGROUND

Mitt Romney was CEO of Bain Capital in 2001; when eToys public company and federal bankruptcy estate was robbed (fraudulently) by Bain. This is one of the main reasons why he claims to be "retroactively" retired from August 2001 (after they offered me a bribe to become his partner and I reported the crime).

It has taken a dozen years to get here;
but they are now in serious harm's way!

Here's the "Preliminary RICO Case Statement" that the judge "acknowledge's" reading.

[br][hr][hr][br]

UPDATE - 2

- The criminal issues at hand!

Someone is going to jail!

Toys R Us (owned by Bain) is in possession of the stolen property of eToys
[
In a CIVIL Racketeering case, one need only provide proof by "preponderance of the level" (the 3 standards in order of strength of facts, evidence, proof required are - beyond all reasonable doubt, clear and convincing and preponderance of&quot -

Additionally, I only need to provide proof that Romney "indirectly" benefited (though he DID directly benefit);
and that's REAL easy to do - because the jerk bragged he gets millions each year from Bain.

Clawbacks are Hell - and Pitten's WILL get clawed!





[br][hr][br]


This whistleblower turned down a bribe from Mitt Romney's gang and reported them to the Department of Justice in 2001 (during the eToys bankruptcy case). Instead of arresting the fraudsters - the Dept. of [IN]Justice rallied its support of Organized Crime (probably in the hopes of doing a POTUS wannabe a favor and get rewarded when Romney handpicked that "friendly" U.S. Attorney General that Sheldon Adelson was putting up $100 million to buy).
[br]

And that Ain't Right!

FACTS NOT in DISPUTE

- - - Yours truly is a victim of organized crime. And, mind you, not just any ordinary efforts in syndicated felony law breaking; but that of/by non other than Willard Mitt Romney ("Romney&quot and his Racketeering GANG. Most have forgotten the fact that Mitt is an attorney at law from Harvard.

Whereas, yours we (eToys shareholders & I) alleged -Romney has a Gang (see list of co-conspirators below) -

Romney became powerful and rich as a corporate raider;
- - - - - - - - - - and did so Illegally!

Because there's much money to be made defending the likes of Mitt; there are many an attorney, troll, stalwart, brown-nosier and other types of detractors/naysayers - who are all too willing to come out and say

"Hey - Pitten's is just a corporate raider who is ruthless and rich.
- - - - - There's nothing against the law of being a corporate raider ruthless".

Bull {c}hit is still manure - no matter how you spell and/or slice the cow pie!

Everyone is already aware that Romney lied about his tenure as Chief Executive Officer ("CEO&quot of Bain Capital. What most are not aware of - are the real reasons WHY the POTUS wannabe claims to be "retroactively" retired from Bain Capital in August 2001; back to February 11, 1999.


[br]

Racketeering Co-Conspirators of Romney's

Yours Truly has the answers to why Mitt lied upon his OGE Campaign Finance 278 Form.

The (REAL) reasons are are;

1. Paul Traub
   
2. Traub's "TBF" law firm
   
3. Barry Gold (Traub's partner)
   
4. Michael Glazer (whom Gold & Traub worked with)
   
5. Greg Werkheiser (a partner of MNAT)
   
6. Colm Connolly (MNAT partner who became U.S. Attorney)
   
7. Goldman Sachs (a client of MNAT)
   
8. Morris Nichols ("MNAT&quot
   
9. Bain Capital (also a Client of MNAT)
   
10. The Learning Company (Merged by MNAT with Mattel)
    
11. Stage Stores (owned by Romney, who hired Michael Glazer, whom Barry Gold worked for with Traub)
    
12. Kay Bee (CEO was Michael Glazer)
    
13. eToys (MNAT as eToys counsel, Traub's TBF eToys creditors counsel,)
    
14. Barry Gold (Traub's confessed partner) became illegal CEO of eToys
    
15. MNAT, Traub and Barry Gold all lied about their links to Romney/Glazer/Bain/Kay bee
    
16. Glazer/Kay Bee - bought eToys (for Romney when he was CEO of Bain)
    
17. Barry Gold, MNAT and Traub did - ILLEGALLY - reduce the prices to Romney/Bain/Glazer/Kay Bee
    

[br]
It is a FACT that all of those parties are connected to each other; as per Court Docket Record Affidavits and Confessions. It is NOT in dispute that Barry Gold and Paul Traub are partners in Asset Disposition Advisors ("ADA&quot . It is CONFESSED (see U.S. Trustee Disgorge Motion of Traub's TBF for $1.6 million dollars {here} AND - Wall Street Journal July 25, 2005 article "eToys investors claims conflicts at law firm&quot .

In parts 19 & 35 of the Disgorge Motion - Federal Police (U.S. Trustee) - notes parties were "forewarned".

The United States Supreme Court did RE-open a previously closed case for YEARS - of In re Hazel Atlas Glass v Hartford Empire and concluded that there are NO Statute of Limitations for Fraud on the Court by Officers of the Court.

Hartford was (eventually) punished for the fraud it did nine (9) years earlier; and the U.S. Supreme set the standard in Hazel Atlas that the Disgorge Motion reiterates appropriately the fact (in part 29) - correctly that -

{T}ampering with the administration of justice in the manner indisputably shown here involves far more than an injury to a single litigant. It is a wrong against the institutions set up to protect and safeguard the public, institutions in which fraud cannot complacently be tolerated consistently with the good order of society. Surely it cannot be that preservation of the integrity of the judicial process must always wait upon the diligence of litigants. The public welfare demands that the agencies of public justice be not so impotent that they must always be mute and helpless victims of deception and fraud.

[br][hr][br]

FELONY Crimes by Romney & his RICO Gang

Rico Case Law:

The defendants constitute an illegal enterprise in acts or threat of acts in violation of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("RICO&quot Act of 1970. The LAW is United States Code Title 18 with Sections, 1961-1968.

One only needs two (2) separate (specific 18 U.S.C. 1961 "predicate acts&quot crimes during a long period of time; in order to successfully prosecute a Civil RICO case under Section 1961(c).

The following are particular violations; of an RICO Section 1961 "predicate acts";
which - by the way - also includes Bankruptcy Frauds!

18 USC 241: Conspiracy against Rights of Citizens:

18 USC 3: Accessory after the fact, knowing that an offense has been
committed against the United States, relieves, receives, comforts or assists
the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment.

18 USC 242: Deprivation of Rights color of law of rights protected under the
Constitution of the U.S.

18 USC 512: Tampering with a witness

18 USC 1341: Mail fraud

18 USC 1343: Wire fraud

18 USC 1503: Obstruction of justice

18 USC 1510: Obstructing of criminal investigation

18 USC 1513: Retaliating against a witness, victim or informant

18 USC 1951: Interference with interstate commerce

18 USC 1621: Perjury

18 USC 1001: Fraud
[br][hr][br]

Federal (Civil) RICO cases are also permitted to review issues of individual "STATE" Felony violations;
as long as they carry more than one (1) year in prison - upon conviction.
[br][hr][br]

SUMMING it UP!

Mitt Romney and his RICO Gang already - ARE - guilty;
because they've confessed to 35 crimes in the eToys federal case.

However,

they were not held accountable for their culpability;
because of the federal corruption of Colm F Connolly!

This plaintiff's case against Romney, is still going forward (thus far);
and - over the next few weeks - I've got a plan to shove the facts up any stalwarts butt.

They are counting on the fact that you'll fall asleep when I quote the Law. It is rather easy for them to point out the fact that "hey, the guy didn't even graduate high school - he simply does NOT understand the Law".

Bull {c}hit is still manure;
no matter who says otherwise.

Could AL Capone "retroactively" escape his acts of organized crimes?

- - - - - - - Of course NOT!

Neither should Mitt - the PITTs - Romney.

Over the next several weeks, I'm going to file - in federal court - the proofs of Romney's RICO/Gang issues of Organized Crimes. By only posting one item at a time. Then the trolls, attorneys at law, stalwarts, naysayers and all who believe it is okay to betray a client - - will only have one thing to attack.

- - - - - - - - -As it now appears tha- the Truth will stop Romney's Gang from being "Scot Free"!
[br][hr][br]



[br][hr][br]

What the wonderful Mr. Reich has not detailed; because he and I have not spoken about it - is the criminal elements of Mitt Romney's gain of super quick wealth. It is there, black and white, for everyone to see (and news stories are about to come out about it in January).

The 3rd Circuit Court (which is over eToys by the way) and Congress - have affirmed a certain bad faith element can rear its ugly head; and that is an "association in fact" also/known/as a "Bankruptcy Ring".

Obviously, Congress was well aware that rigging of the U.S. Bankruptcy system is problematic. The Law making arm of our nation’s government built-in the Bankruptcy Fraud statutes §§ 152 thru 156 (“predicate acts”) as part of the Racketeering Felonies of 18 USC § 1961.



Due, in part, to the hubris of Romney and his Bankruptcy Ring believing his POTUS quest would succeed; there’s a vast evidence trail full of rock-solid date/ time stamped Bankruptcy Fraud violations. Compliance of the specificity/particularity requisites of Fed.R.Civ.P 9(b) are therefore freely achieved.

December 20, 2013

DOJ Denies Duplicity in Bain CoverUp

Yours truly has been battling Romney & his RICO gang about eToys.com - for 12 years now (see PoliticusUSA Rmuse story - here). In so doing, much information and many Smoking Gun evidences have been discovered.



As iterated by Rmuse of PolitcusUSA.com; Romney was sued for RICO in Fed Court (October 18, 2013); because Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital, vis-a-vis their attorneys, perpetrated massive frauds in many courts and case as partners. But the DOJ says there's no merits to this claim; and there's no cover up (see Letter - here).

The problem with the remarks of the Department of Justice = is the fact that they can NOT back up their claims; because of that little thing called evidence. Whereas, we can prove (and will at trial) that Romney is a Racketeer and the DOJ, with its US Trustee office - are duplicitous by CoverUp. Romney claimed to be "retroactively" retired; because the organized crime spree began in 1999 and went super criminal masterminds in eToys in 2001.


http://www.politicususa.com/2012/11/02/public-records-reveal-romney-profited-corruption-fraud-racketeering-bain.html
[br][Hr][br]

Main Stream Media Stories on the case

What is funny about it all, is that the Department of Justice United States Trustee's office states in their letter (here) that my claims have no merit; but they fail to address the issue that the US Trustee's office already helped me get CONFESSIONS.

1. US Trustee Motion for $1.6 million fine - in Parts 19 & 35 - document Fraud on the Court
   
   
2. Wall Street Journal documents confessions "eToys investors claim conflict"
   
   
3. Rigging IPO Game story by NYT - documents Goldman Sachs fraud of eToys
   
   
4. I'm one source of Rolling Stone Cover by Taibbi "Greed and Debt" a True Story About Romney and Bain.
   
   
5. Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital utilize same firm in DE (MNAT)
   
   
6. As "Greed and Debt" story points out Bain got paid $83 million and MNAT represents Bain
   
   
7. Your truly pointed that crime out to the court (here).
   
   
8. US Trustee has NO authority over crimes; but gives Traub immunity (here)
   
   
9. Then US Trustee rescues the crooks with Motion to expunge my evidence (here).
   
   
10. Able to get away with all of this because MNAT partner became U.S. Attorney (see Resume - here).
    

[br][hr][br]

You can't have Al Capone (Romney) arrange for one of his Frank Nitti's (Colm Connolly) to become the chief federal prosecutor; and then claim there's NO merit to allegations of fraud and corruption.

When that crooked federal prosecutor refused to investigate his former partner (MNAT) and clients (Sachs & Bain).
[br][hr][br]

One day soon, a news story will bring -

------ then the UNtenable house of cards

-------------------------will come crashing down upon them!
[br]




Toys R Us is in possession of the stolen property of eToys;
and yours truly intends to stop the toying around - and get back what was stolen!

What you see above is less than 10% of my evidence.

[br][hr][br]

Riddle me this!

Martha Stewart went to jail for one small lie (about selling her stock). In these case we have attorneys at law admitting they lied under oath 34 times to a chief judge. So how is it that no one gets punished for this and the DOJ tells U.S. that our allegations are without meit?

Paul Traub got a slap on the wrist fine in eToys and then became partners with fraudster Marc Dreier and Ponzi schemer Tom Petters. But Traub is Romney's pal, so he never has to go to jail. Another guy who never had to go to jail is Marty Lackner, who was brother of Minnesota Asst. US. Attorney J. Lackner.

That is HEAD of the DOJ's Criminal Divison - J Lackner.

So how is it that Marty Lackner was a partner of the crimes; but never gets indicted?

-------------- Because he (purportedly) committed suicide!

REALLY!!!??!?!?!?!?!?!!?

December 19, 2013

U.S. Trustee Denies Allegations of Bain Capital CoverUp

Source: Executive Office of United States Trustee

Today, Laser Haas is in reception of the following letter from the U.S. Department of Justice, Executive Office of United States Trustee via its Office of General Counsel. To wit;

December 16, 2013

Mr. Laser Haas
Laser.haas@yahoo.com

Dear Mr. Haas;

- - - This responds to your facsimile of October 26, 2012, making a complaint against Roberta DeAngelis, United States Trustee for Region 3, and Mark Kenney, Trial Attorney, in connection with the case of eToys, Inc., Case No. 01-706 (Bankr. D. Del.). You allege that Ms. DeAngelis and Mr. Kenney acted in bad faith in their supervision of this bankruptcy case to benefit Bain Capital and to conceal their fraud. ----
[br]

- - - To respond to your inquiry, we reviewed information received from the Office of the United States Trustee with responsibility for this case as well as information obtained from the courts' dockets involved with this case and associated appeals. ---

[br]
----- Although we understand that you are not satisfied...... "after a review of the record and the facts before us, we conclude your allegation is without merit. As to the complaint that Ms. DeAngelis and Mr. Kenney improperly benefited Bain Capital, we find no evidence to support this assertion.

Read more: http://petters-fraud.com/dec18_2013_eoust_letter_to_laser.pdf

---

--------BACKGROUND

Yours truly owns CLI, a CA corporation that was approved to handle the eToys bankruptcy. The stock went to $85 per share; but eToys only get $18 (or less) per share. It was the plan to sell the bankrupt eToys to Bain/Kay Bee Toys for $3 to $5.4 million dollars. The party that took eToys public but made hundreds of millions vanished, is none other than Goldman Sachs (See NY Times story of March 2013 "Rigging the IPO Game&quot .

The MNAT law firm works for Goldman Sachs in Delaware and has CONFESSED lying about that issue, in order to become the eToys attorney. Where, once inside eToys, with a sworn oath by MNAT to protect its client (eToys), then MNAT - by acts of PERJURY - asked for (and rec'd) permission from the Delaware Bankruptcy Court to Destroy eToys Books n Records. This hurt MNAT's court approved client (eToys) for the sake of its secret client (Goldman Sachs).

Also,

To put it succinctly, there are more than 300 crimes that have transpired, involving billions of dollars; and we have CONFESSIONS to extensively heinous and egregious defilements of the integrity of the judicial process. Whereas, Romney's (secret) law firms of TBF and MNAT have openly broken the law. Then I found Smoking Gun proof a couple of years later; which compelled the bad faith parties to confess. The law mandates that the parties be removed from the eToys, FAO Schwartz and Kay Bee cases;

but the U.S. Trustee's office said they don't care!

[br][hr][hr]

BACKGROUND

Office of United States Trustee must do their job policing the bankruptcy courts. Here's the U.S. Trustee Motion to Disgorge the Traub firm. It states in parts 19 & 35 that the acts were deliberate and concludes in part 35 that fraud on the court transpired.

Here is the link to the EOUST letter to yours truly (Letter from EOUST).

December 17, 2013

In the War Against the Homeless - Where Do You Stand?

I'm watching with great anxiety, the trial of the Fullerton Police who brutally beat and murdered homeless man Kelly Thomas. Because we fought a battle against the cops bad faith from the beginning (see articles here & here) - many a person send me updates and suggestions to work with the Kelly Thomas Foundation for the Homeless.

Laser - the homeless guy.

Just a few months ago, I spoke to Ron Thomas, the retired Los Angeles County Sheriff who was the father of Kelly Thomas. Previously, Ron Thomas has held many rallies in Fullerton, CA - seeking justice. He also created the Kelly Thomas Memorial Foundation for the Homeless, in honor of his son Kelly Thomas. Ron and I had discussed having a special event to raise $20,000.00 or so for the charity. Ron Thomas wanted to do so; but the on coming trial just put too much anxiety in the air. Sadly, the event will have to wait till some time next year.

Ron Thomas didn't know my real name, until recently. Even when I presented to him, during the 1st Kelly Thomas fund-raiser, with a hundred brand new women's Harley Davidson blue jeans. That is because he has enough to deal with and my debacle with others need not bother him further. But I did tell him, as we spoke about the charity event - that I had a surprise for him.

That surprise - is that yours truly - is also a homeless man.

Now, granted, I'm in the state of flux because of a real bizarre set of circumstances far different than most. The truth of the matter is, I choose to be homeless. Now those of you who are smirking and saying "just another bum" - to you I say No Way besmirches - I've got good reason; as do most other homeless people.

Like a Afghan war vet with special circumstances making it hard to function in society; I've got things just as bizarre. People are dead in the particular battle I'm in (Racketeering Romney case); and I simply can't put others in harms way.

My brother and many, many people, like Sybil from NY and Mr. Ellenike (a Greek Historian extraordinary) have all offered me their place to stay. But the eToys shareholder who joined with me - had to shoot & kill an assailant - and my daughter was abducted. It is just real simple. Either I give up and let Romney & his RICO Gang win - where I can get on with a normal life. Or I stay away from the normal state of being. It is wrong to burden others with my struggles, simply because of society's need to keep U.S. all conform.

No business owner wants me and my baggage; and I don't blame them. Nor can I promise any company long term utilization of my talents as an executive who managed thousands. This is because my quest to arrest Mitt Romney is a mandate - paramount. (You may think it impossible, but all things big are never easy).

Besides, being homeless and existing like an easy target has made me free. I face each day with the tasks of the battle at hand (more legal brief draftings, studying the law, making friends in the battles against tyranny, cronyism and corruption like Horace Boothroyd III - who provided me the picture below). Spending 18 hours a day at the quest and such is my life's work. Unfortunately, until I defeat the enemy - the pay sucks. Meanwhile, each day, I face the need of getting two meals and my $1 shower at the rec center - usually with great success. Often, I'm even able to feed others

Every homeless person has just as solid a story and/or reason for being where they are.
[br][hr][br]

Beating, Stabbing and Setting Homeless Sleepers on Fire!

Our dear Kelly Thomas saga and its extreme acts of violence upon the homeless, is not as seldom as you'd think. There are vigilantes who go after the homeless under some perverted sense of justice that they are higher up on the evolutionary ladder; and must rid society of the less fortunate ilk. One guy went around stabbing homeless people in the back while they slept and left a "death warrant" written by his own hand - as justification (see the N.Y. Daily News story - here). In Van Nuys, California, one woman was horrifically set on fire while sleeping on a bench (see story - here).

How serious would the war on homeless be, if the homeless - in turn - went to war on those who had homes?

There's a civil war out here, against those who are down trodden. That is because none of the U.S. wishes to see skid row outside our front door. It makes one feel extremely uncomfortable. Common sense tells U.S. that such does not bode well for safety. Be that as it may, does our desire for comfort, in combination with our apathy for others plight, give U.S. grounds to make a war upon the homeless?

What does such say about who we are as a people, nation and planet?

We all struggle to get through life's viscous and never ending costs on one level or another. Student loans never-ending, taxes and gas prices on the rise. Veterans returning and finding it hard to cope. Single mom and/or dads. Losing your home to storm, fire, sink hole. Not many of U.S. can even begin to guess how many in the Philippines are still suffering and may never, ever see a home again. The lists goes on and on.

When devastating dynamics hit hard, some reach out to family, friends and their strength of will to struggle back. Others simply can't seem to get their neck above water. Those with no where and/or no one to go to - become homeless. It simply is a fact of life.

For such - what is to be done? --------- What is society to do - about homeless persons?
[br][hr][br]

Homelessness and Sleeping in Your Car is a Crime - Worldwide!

It is not only happening here in the U.S. - in England a reporter was fined for sleeping in his car (story - here). Just this week there was an article in the SoCal papers about how Venice, California was cracking down on homeless people in their vehicles by giving them fines for sleeping in their cars.

The police are allowed to be detainer and jury if they find you with a blanket in your car, and/or with cans of food or drink. If you are caught with a pee bottle - you are subject to being hauled into the jail house and getting your car confiscated (because diabetics don't exist in Venice). A Judge reviewed the Laws on such as too broad and unconstitutional. It did not slip by the court that what Venice Beach seeks to do, is slap the arse's of the homeless in such a fashion that they'll move over to L.A. County or elsewhere.

In other words - Not In My Back Yard!
[br][hr][br]

Poverty Is - As Poverty Does!

--------- - Living on Minimum Wage is Homelessness!

We are in a country where our elected officials don't want a minimum wage that makes sense. Even when Australia, with its $15 minimum wage - is the only country that dodge the recent worldwide financial debacles; our elected officials continue to fight over making it just $10 per hour here in America.

This, from guys who get $150,000 per year the rest of their lives - for voting down $10 per hour.

------------------------------------------ Now That's a Crime!

McDonalds put out a false report and got slammed, when it tried to make it appear that anyone working for its minimum wage could (easily) make ends meet. The fact of the matter is, the number one thing that costs U.S. all too much money is rent. A one bedroom apartment here in Los Angeles is $1000 per month plus. Even if you made $10 per hour that equates to $1700 per month. Minus taxes - if you are lucky - you'll take home around $1350. That leaves (again - if you are lucky) - $350 per month for food, clothes, insurance, cell phone.

And forget about gas or car (G-d forbid you should get caught sleeping in it).

Zoning laws MUST change

. --- There's one new towering building in the heart of Los Angeles that charges $750 per month for studios. In New York City, people are finding re-zoned areas where they are living in an entire apartment that would have been just 1/2 the size of the bedroom I had in 2001. We can make it easier on all of U.S. if the wealthy didn't make all the damn rules.

After all - no homeless could EVER get away with sleeping in front of a Beverley Hills home!
[br][hr][br]

What About a Bruce Willis 5th Element Styled - 1 Room Apartment?

We can have a Bruce Willis type pad such as he had in 5th Element. No one REALLY needs a full size refrigerator. No one REALLY needs a queen/king bed. Couches that serve as a put away bed - no longer have to be back breakers of steel rods with 1/2 inch mattresses made of foam. They call them lounge chairs and such now.

We simply MUST adapt to the reality that wage supply has not kept up with the fact there's less and less rooms to go around!

Back last year, a good Orange County Register Columnist (David Whiting) hit the nail on the proverbial head with his March 2012 article titled "Dumb laws? Cities ban sleeping in cars". It is a real short article on the first page - I suggest you read it.

Meanwhile, here's nearly 1/2 of it with David Whiting's conclusion apropos;

[br][hr][br]

If You Beat Up on & Oppress the Homeless - Won't They will simply Go AWAY!

The greater Los Angeles Food Coalition is feeding the homeless at night; and that's pissing off the homeowners who don't want it happening in their neighborhood. After all - it might encourage more homeless to get in line for the free meal (damn those bums). There are instances all over the place - of evictions of the homeless. See the story of that and other tales of homeless people being evicted at te La.curbed.com website (here).

As for me, I like the church in Oregon doing their thingy

!

Her, in his own words by Horace Boothroyd III (whom I lovingly call Mr. III) - is what the picture below is all about;



[br]


[br][hr][br]

In the War Against the Homeless - What Side Are You On?

So tonight, because security is now beefed up for shopping during Christmas, there's a bored security guy who knows we park our car from 1 am till 5 am by Starbucks. I will need to avoid his police wannabe'ness. When he first banged on our hood of the car (actually put a dent in it and deliberately bent our radio antenna) - and scared/forced U.S. to go elsewhere; the Starbucks manager heard about it and told him to leave the regular customers alone. (Where I get my 2 free meals - most often - is word around SB's that I'll do blogs & websites - etc., for the business entrepreneurs who come to SB and meet clients. In turn - they feed me. Isn't that "working&quot .

But the Security guy told me he hates homeless people - so he beeps his horn around us every 10 mins., until 5 am.

Therefore, I will sneak into my storage locker after the cleaning girls leave at 10 pm. The gate doesn't close until midnight and the office closed at 9 pm. I go into my locker (which I learned how to make it appear like it is locked from the outside). Then I weigh down the doors with weights of 150 lbs. So - even if someone were to come by and check - they couldn't lift the doors. (If they could, being that the locks ARE on there - would such be "unlawful" entry)? I will remain until the gate re-opens at 6 am. Then I'll scurry off to the bathroom and back to Starbucks (my online haven heaven).

Did you know there's laws too - about sleeping in storage lockers?


--------------------------------------------------------------------Merry Christmas!
[br][hr][br]

December 16, 2013

I've got many bones to pick with "the church"; but this guy Rocks!

He is stating stuff - oh so good to hear - from one held so dear!

December 12, 2013

UPDATE - Racketeering Romney Litigation - (? VEGAS odds on MittTwit answering Complaint?).

Down below is a look upon the docket of the federal court styled layout concerning the October 18, 2013 Racketeering lawsuit yours truly filed against Mitt Romney and his RICO Gang of unjust enrichment profiteers. We are now in day 55 of the lawsuit progressing forward (Specifically - no corruption rearing its ugly head and shutting the case down). A couple of decent introspects into the case can be found at PoliticusUSA.com articles by Rmuse (here) (here) & (here), DailyKos (here) & (here) and the ObamaCrat (here).



To tell you the truth, I find it a miracle that we've gotten this far. So much so, it boggles my mind that the Delaware bad faith adjudication upon the merits is not storming the castle. Each and every day I go to the docket through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system ("PACER&quot ; so doing to verify to myself - that undue influence has not taken over. My veins tighten, my heart speeds up and I get tense - each/every single time I go to the Los Angeles District Court website and look up case 2:13-cv-7738.

And yet, by miracle of miracles - here we are in day 55 of the "Haas v Romney" case; which IS going forward.

Here's the thing. I've got MittTwit and his gang of nefarious men/attorneys by the proverbial's. The evidence is profuse, overwhelming and irrefutable. Most of the proofs of the Racketeering is found in the court docket record. The reason the evidence trail is something a 1st failing law student could successfully prosecute them all - is because of hubris. Romney, Traub and MNAT simply did NOT give a damn how much lying, thieving and corruption they did openly. They stalwarts arduously believed that their "boss" was going to be THE BOSS of America (POTUS).

But - Mitt Didn't Make It!

Delaware Valley federal courts and agencies (U.S. Trustee & U.S. Attorney) - have rogue elements within who are also guilty of being duplicitous in the racketeering. Unfortunately, I'm not allowed to name the agencies as defendants; but I have named the former United States Attorney Colm F Connolly.



Next week I'm going to file a motion (and pay careful attention to this now) that is asking the court to stipulate (under Federal Rule Civil Procedure 201 "Judicial Notice&quot - and make a ruling on the fact that Mitt Romney & his co-Defendants are NOT above the Law. Obviously, that is an extraordinary request. After all, judges swear an oath to administrate the law equally to rich & poor alike. But I'm asking a legitimate question. Are parties like Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital and Mitt Romney above the Law?

Prior to this good faith justice (His Honor Stephen V. Wilson) taking on the "Haas v Romney" Racketeering case and permitting it to go through proper procedure; everyone else (heretofore) has treated Mitt & his gang as "IF" they ARE above the law.

And that ain't right.

So, now that the case is proceeding along (thus far) in proper form - the next step is that the parties are to be served a Summons and have to answer within 21 days.

However - I've made a request that the judge (due to mayhem & homicides) order the U.S. Marshals to serve the Summonses.

But, I'm going to amend that request, now that I've studied the Federal Rule of Civil Procedures (specifically Rule 4); which states that you can request a party "waive" service. When such is done (by mail) in a federal lawsuit, the defendants canNOT be unreasonable. When that process goes its course, Romney & his gang will have 30 days (instead of 21) - to respond.

Which brings U.S. to the point - what would be the Las Vegas ODDs on such occurring?

There are many an attorney trying to help the bandits who bragged & sneered that the case would be tossed out by the Clerk of Court. When that didn't happen, the trolls and such said that the judge would FINE me (specifically under Fed.R.Civ.P 11) - for daring to bring the case into court. But none of those brown-nosers are looking at that little thing called evidence. We already have confessions to 34 acts of lying under oath to a chief federal justice. To win this case, I only need 2 acts (technically). Though, I'll grant this - that the court is going to require more than a mere two.

And I've got plenty proofs more!

So, being that Capone's ghost incarnate (Romney) has been caught with his pants down; how is that "magic" underwear of his going to get him out of this jam? He doesn't have his billion dollar advertising budget (though - technically - he still owns Clear Channel/Rush Lame-baugh)! So how will the case go? If Romney answers the Summons/ Complaint - the main stream media will have NO choice. They will have to pick up the story.

Again - what are the VEGAS odds that Mitt will answer the complaint?

Will Romney and his gang all get together and ask the court to have me shot? They simply can NOT answer the complaint. If they were honest (I think it is actually against the Law for Pitten's to not engage in flip flopping banter) - then the answer would be something like this;


---
Will maniacal Mitt answer - Or will the powers that be - come into play?




[br][hr][hr][br]

[br]
Date Filed: 10/18/2013
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
[hr]
Plaintiff
Steven Laser Haas
-----------------
Delmar, DE 19940
PRO SE

V.
Defendant
Willard Mitt Romney

Defendant
Paul Traub

Defendant
Bain Capital

Defendant
John and Jane Does
1 thru 10

Defendant
Morris Nichols Arsht and Tunnel ("MNAT&quot

Defendant
Greg Werkheiser

Defendant
Barry Gold

Defendant
Michael Glazer

Defendant
Colm F Connolly

Defendant
Goldman Sachs

Defendant
Johann Hamerski

Date Filed # Docket Text

10/18/2013 2 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint - 1 as to defendants Bain Capital, Colm F Connolly, Michael Glazer, Barry Gold, Goldman Sachs, Morris Nichols Arsht and Tunnel, Willard Mitt Romney, Paul Traub, Greg Werkheiser. (esa) (Entered: 10/24/2013)



10/24/2013 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg is participating in a pilot project regarding the submission of SEALED DOCUMENTS. Effective July 8, 2013, all proposed sealed documents pertaining to discovery matters referred to the magistrate judge must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address at AGR_Chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. Please refer to the judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 10/24/2013)



11/06/2013 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Bain Capital, Colm F Connolly, Michael Glazer, Barry Gold, Goldman Sachs, John and Jane Does, Morris Nichols Arsht and Tunnel, Willard Mitt Romney, Paul Traub, Greg Werkheiser, Johann Hamerski amending Complaint - (Discovery), 1 , filed by Plaintiff Steven Laser Haas (Attachments: # 1 Part 2, # 2 Part 3)(pj) (Entered: 11/07/2013)



12/02/2013 8 RACKETEERING CIVIL PRELIMINARY RICO CASE STATEMENT 1st Edition Part A filed by Plaintiff Steven Laser Haas (pj) (Entered: 12/10/2013)
[br]

December 11, 2013

Kicking & Rec'ing - THANKS for this. Just wish she were a Senator somewhere else than Bain'ville

She was a bankruptcy case attorney and KNOWs I've got Pitten's by the proverbials;
but - I can't ask her to go full bore - against her constituents.

Just seems skewed!

December 11, 2013

Romney the Racketeer - Fed Ct - UpDate December 10, 2013 - Preliminary RICO Case Statement

Yours truly, as an executive of eToys.com and a fiduciary who blew the whistle on Romney the Racketeer, found it necessary to "Sue Romney for RICO in Fed Court" on October 18, 2013.

An "1st Amended Complaint" was filed thereafter (See Complaint part 1 - part 2 and part 3).

Resultantly - the Fed Ct assigned the Honorable Justice Stephen V. Wilson;
who issued the "New Case Order".

Purportedly, many federal courts require, of those who file Civil Racketeering Complaints as "Private Attorney Generals" - to do as prosecutors must - by disclosing the entire case against the Defendants, up front. Upon receiving an Order from the court stipulating a pre-determined outline of issues/facts; a plaintiff then is required (usually within 20/30 days) to supply a "RICO Case Statement".

While yours truly is anticipating such will come soon enough, in anticipation of such;
a submission of a "Preliminary RICO Case Statement" was Clocked into the docket record today.

Stay Tuned...


much - much more, to come![br]

November 27, 2013

Main Stream reporter points out my mistake on Marty Lackner suicide story.

Marty Lackner "reportedly" committed suicide during the Petters Ponzi case. What is at issue is that Paul Traub was Petters partner and Paul Traub is also Mitt Romney's partner.

Even - "if" - Marty Lackner actually did kill himself (which this pursuer of justice feels is suspect); the fact of the matter remains that J. Lackner was Marty Lackner's brother. And J. Lackner is the Assistant United States Attorney (head at the time of the Criminal Prosecution Division) - of the Minnesota Department of Justice United States Attorney's office.

Am I the ONLY one who understands the significance of all those facts?

In the many quests to find fault with yours truly - concerning my Romney Racketeering federal lawsuit (see "Haas v Romney" issues - HERE) I've run into many naysayers and main stream media fault finders. Having talked to everyone from NBC Universal, independents, Ed Schultz's Producer, HuffPo and Associated Press and more; I'm still amazed at the profuse amount of cognitive dissonance and haughty bias. Now one gal said to me yesterday -

"Laser, you're mistaken about your contention on the Marty Lackner story"!

Of course my back tensed up, my hair stiffened and I got irked at her real quick. Responding to her remark with a quick cutoff of any further banter from her, I simply said "Hush up ma'an, your touting Bull [c]hit"!

[br][hr][br]

BACKGROUND - Who is Marty Lackner and why he (purportedly) committed suicide!

It is highly unusual that any one individual would be engaged in a civil war type battle with Mitt Romney; as he tends to slaughter companies - not just one person. And it is also highly unusual that anyone would turn down a bribe and chance to be Pitten's partner. Be that as it may, Romney and I are adversaries and yours truly filed a Federal RICO case against him on October 18th; in order to resolve our dispute.

Laser Haas alleges Romney is a Racketeer; and almost everyone out there thinks I'm nuts.

Naysayers are about to eat their words!

Marty Lackner passed away in 2009; after he and his friends contacted me concerning the Minnesota federal cases on Tom Petters Ponzi (see Star Tribune stories (here).



I'm the blogging expert on Petters Ponzi; because Paul Traub is Petters partner and yours truly has hounded the feds for a decade to arrest them both. (See my "Petters-Fraud" website (here), (here) and (here).

The reason why Marty and/or other parties contacted yours truly about the Tom Petters, is the fact that word spread around anonymous people and "tippers" could contact me and trust I would not reveal them as a source.

What Marty Lackner and his friends told me, is that he was involved in the Petters Ponzi affairs. Marty claimed he had broken no laws and that he was the brother of J. Lackner.

That would be Minnesota, Assistant United States Attorney Jim Lackner;
who was also head of the Dept of Justice's Criminal Prosecution Division

.

To put it succinctly, I said "Bull [c]hit" and hung up the phone.

Because so much evidence was flowing through my hands and being forwarded on to the United States Attorneys office in Minnesota and I was also alleging that federal corruption was occurring; I believed the first phone call was a set up - to get me for Obstruction.

Then friends of Marty Lackner called me and informed of his purported suicide.

From that day forward, no matter how much I may doubt the validity of someone's contentions, I now take the time to instruct them to email me a summary; and then I perform a preliminary investigation into the issues - before I consider denouncing their remarks.



As of a few days ago, the only story that was known to me, about Marty Lackner, is the Minnesota Public Radio online article titled "More than lost fortunes in the wake of Petters' Ponzi scheme"

If you'll take the time to look at the article, you will see two things. Marty Lackner WAS involved in the Petters Ponzi scheme (via Greg Bell's Lancelot/Sky Bell "feeder" funds); and that yours truly is the only commenter.
[br]

People say Laser Haas is a CT Nut on the issue that Marty Lackner & J Lackner are brothers.

- - It is a miracle that MPR censors permitted my comments to remain. Everyone, including people who know me well - stated that I'm full of bull. But my allegations upon the MPR Fortunes Lost story do remain; and I've been attacked by thousands of people (including close friends) who say they don't believe me.

What is at issue is the fact that it is super HUGE news of ANYONE being directly connected to Tom Petters Ponzi and the Minnesota Dept. of Justice; and (surely) the No. 1 main stream newspaper in Minnesota (the Star Tribune) would have carried such an important story. Hence, if ST is not telling the tale, then Laser Haas is simply taking 2 people with the same last name and making stuff up.

EAAANNNTTT - How terribly Wrong those bubble farquarts truly are!

After all, there are so many nationally significant and important issues that beg. Surely no entity such as the Star Tribune would be remiss in its chance to answer the riddle of how Bernie Madoff and/or Tom Petters could do Billions in frauds and get away with it for more than a decade. Especially since the Star Tribune was fighting for its very life and would have rushed to get national attention to such a HUGE story (the ST filed for bankruptcy during the Petters Ponzi case). Again, there are SO MANY questions that beg.

Like the questions that

1. Did Marty Lackner know Petters was a Ponzi schemer?
   
2. "IF" Marty and J. Lackner are brothers - what did J. Lackner KNOW?
   
3. Did J. Lackner ever receive ANY gifts from his brother Marty?
   
4. Such as a vacation, a boat, car - or House!
   
5. Had Marty and Jim EVER engaged in ANY discussion about Tom Petters?
   
6. Are there emails between the two?
   
7. If so, WHERE are those emails now?
   
8. Who at the Dept of Justice did the review of Marty/Jim Lackner issue?
   
9. Why hasn't the Minnesota and/or D.C. DOJ come forward about the connection?
   
10. WERE the emails between Marty and Jim - DESTROYED?
    
11. Where is J. Lackner NOW?
    
12. Was he put on suspension during the Petters Ponzi case?
    
13. WHO ELSE at the DOJ (either/or MN and/or Washington D.C.) KNEW about the connection?
    
14. WHY hasn't Petters utilized that issue and Larry Reynolds being in WISTEC to get a New Trial?
    
15. If the MN DOJ did NOT know of the connection, surely Marty was under investigation!
    
16. Are there files on Marty Lackner?
    
17. Where are those files NOW!
    
18. Who at the DOJ (MN or otherwise) took control of the Marty Lackner/Jim Lackner review?
    
19. IF Marty Lackner did commit suicide - WHY?
    
20. MOST importantly - DID MARTY LACKNER actually kill himself?
    

Marty Lackner was in his 40's, had a wife and 3 children;

and he (purportedly) left NO NOTE!

[br]
[hr][br]

Actually - the reporter is right! - AND - Yours truly didn't get it wrong!

Aha! - - Confused now! - - Aren't you?

You are going to spank me now, for being such a smart ass, in my efforts to stick it up the butt and rotate the naysayers/ Congnitive Dissonance Gangs. Because I could have titled this thing a whole other way, to point out the fact that yours truly didn't get it wrong; and yes - the main stream (VERY main stream) reporter is also correct.

What the media gal (who -btw - is BEGGING for her editor to do the "Haas v Romney" full story) said to yours truly is that "Laser, you're mistaken about your contention on the Marty Lackner story". She is absolutely 100% correct. I did get something wrong.

Of the many remarks that I've made about the case, foolishly trying to defend my remarks against stalwarts, naysayers, petty people and others hell bent to find fault with me (and/or stick their brown nose right up Romney's arse) - are 2 primary statements.

1 - Marty Lackner is the brother of Minnesota Assistant U.S. Attorney Jim Lackner

and

2 - That "No main stream media outlet has dared to tell the story"


Do you see now - where we are going?

How Laser Haas knows that Marty Lackner is the brother of Minnesota Assistant United States Attorney J. Lackner; is the very FACT that yours truly got the tip straight from the horse's mouth.

Marty Lackner told me that Jim Lackner was his brother.

All the detractors state that yours truly is simply making stuff up. That what I'm guilty of, is taking two people with the same last name; and adding A+B to equal my desired QEZ.

EAAANTTT!

As I've told you, I'm able to prove (by emails and more) how truly full of horse pie the naysayers are.

We now have corroboration, that will (forevermore) shut up the contention that yours truly is simply making stuff up, in order to reach a desired conclusion. As it is now an undeniable FACT that Marty Lackner was involved in Petters Ponzi via Lancelot.

Unfortunately, it is also a FACT that Marty Lackner (purportedly) committed suicide in 2009!
(See Legacy.com Obituary - here and MPR story - here).

- - That being said, it is now also a FACT that Marty Lackner is the brother of Minnesota (former head of Criminal Prosecution Division) - Assistant United States Attorney J. Lackner. As is iterated by Main Justice website (here) that;

James Lackner (Appellate Chief)

Prior to this appointment, Lackner served as Senior Litigation Counsel from December 1994 to August 2005; Criminal Division Chief from August 2005 to April 2007; and First Assistant U.S. Attorney from March 2006 to December 2006. Lackner, who joined the Office in December 1983, graduated from Macalester College in 1975 and Northwestern University Law School in 1978. He joined the Office after working in the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office.

[br]

PROOF Marty Lackner and MN AUSA J. Lackner are brothers!

[br]
Now, for the final nail in the naysay coffin (that also provides verification that the main stream reporter was correct - yours truly got the Marty Lackner story wrong - one the "issue" that "NO main stream media outlet has reported the Lackner links&quot . Here's an article by Pioneer Press website (TwinCities.com) titled "What did the money men know"?

Which states specifically;


[br]

Now, we can all get ready for the naysay kumquats remarking - - "So What"!

[br][hr][br]


[br]

As for me, the "List" above and those questions ARE going to be answered;
unless the same type of corruption that hid this issue - prevents my "Haas v Romney"

from going to trial!

[br]

N'est-ce pas!