TomCADem
TomCADem's JournalTrump Calling Media Enemy of the American People Reminiscent of Stalin, Mao
The comment at the end is enlightening. With Trump as President, we have lost the moral high ground to promote free speech with a President who routinely attacks free expression as dangerous.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/02/18/trump_calling_media_enemy_of_the_american_people_reminiscent_of_stalin_mao.html
President Donald Trump has never shied away from criticizing the news media. But he seemed to take things to a new level on Friday when he wrote in a tweet that media outlets, including the New York Times, NBC, ABC, CBS, and CNN are the enemy of the American people. (His first tweet only included the Times, CNN, and NBC and ended with the conclusion: SICK! But that was quickly deleted.) Both tweets did include some choice capitalization as the commander-in-chief labeled the outlets the FAKE NEWS media.
Trump blasting the news media is nothing new, of course. Even a day earlier, Trump uttered the phrase fake news seven times during a White House news conference. Yet labeling the media the enemy of the American people seemed to take things to a new level and many quickly drew parallels to tyrants throughout history that were fond of the phrase. Although it harkens back to ancient Rome, many remember that the phrase was used during the purges ordered by Soviet dictator Josef Stalin. "It is one of the most controversial phrases in Soviet history," explained Mitchell Orenstein, professor of Russian and East European studies at the University of Pennsylvania. "What it basically meant was a death sentence.
The expression was also a favorite of Chinas Mao Zedong, who used the enemies of the people label against anyone who opposed his policies. Identifying and later punishing those enemies was central to Maos rule. A Chinese journalist, Li Yuan, pointed out the parallel on Twitter, noting that every dissenting voice was the enemy of the people under Mao.
Beijing seems to be welcoming this fresh attack on the news media with glee. Chinas state-run newspaper Global Times noted in an editorial that Trumps war with mainstream media would make it difficult for the president to challenge Beijing on ideological issues such as human rights. His war with mainstream media makes it difficult for Trump to ally with the media on the ideological front against China, the newspaper said. Many have predicted that Trumps presidency would exacerbate the recession of liberalism.
Anti-Trump demonstrators finding wealth of options in once-apathetic Miami
Source: USA Today
MIAMI In a city known more for its beaches and night life than its political activism, it's suddenly become hard to keep track of all the groups that have formed to oppose President Trump.
On a recent Sunday, more than 400 people filled a church for an organizing meeting of Women's March Miami-Dade chapter, a group that paid for 200 people to attend the Jan. 21 march in Washington, D.C., held its own march in Miami and is now branching out to advocate for nearly a dozen issues ranging from LGBT rights to gun control.
One hour later and two blocks away, about 50 people sat outside a bookstore for the third meeting of Indivisible Miami, a group that is pushing a defensive strategy to block the executive orders flying out of Trump's White House.
There's a group that held a hunger strike last week to get the local mayor to abandon Trump's immigration policies. There are ongoing demonstrations by the local Black Lives Matter movement. There are new groups created by former Hillary Clinton campaign staffers and other groups formed by people who had no political background at all.
Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/19/donald-trump-protest-movement-miami/97905320/
NY Times - "A Party to the Russian Connection" - Why McConnell Will Not Investigate
Part of the reason why Republicans are obstructing any type of independent inquiry is because it will highlight their aggressive efforts to oppose any disclosure of Trump's Russian connections during the campaign. They are in too deep.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/17/opinion/a-party-to-the-russian-connection.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region®ion=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region
President Trumps disturbing Russian connections present an acute danger to American national security. According to reports this week, Mr. Trumps team maintained frequent contact with Russian officials, including senior intelligence officers, during the campaign. This led to concerns about possible collusion with one of Americas principal strategic adversaries as it tried to influence the election in Mr. Trumps favor. On Monday, Mr. Trumps national security adviser, Michael T. Flynn, was forced to resign after details of his communications with the Russian ambassador emerged.
Republican leaders in Congress now bear the most responsibility for holding the president accountable and protecting the nation. They cant say they didnt see the Russian interference coming. They knew all along.
Early in 2015, senior Republican congressional leaders visited Ukraine and returned full of praise for its fight for independence in spite of Russias efforts to destabilize the country and annex some of its regions. And in June, coincidentally just before Mr. Trump announced his campaign for the Republican nomination, they met with Ukraines prime minister in Washington one of many meetings I attended as a senior aide to the House Republican Conference.
As the presidential race wore on, some of those leaders began to see parallels between Russias disinformation operations in Ukraine and Europe and its activities in the United States. They were alarmed by the Kremlin-backed cable network RT America, which was running stories intended, they judged, to undermine Americans trust in democratic institutions and promote Mr. Trumps candidacy. Deeply unsettled, the leaders discussed these concerns privately on several occasions I witnessed.
Trump familys elaborate lifestyle is a logistical nightmare at taxpayer expense
Source: MSN/Washington Post
Barely a month into the Trump presidency, the unusually elaborate lifestyle of Americas new first family is straining the Secret Service and security officials, stirring financial and logistical concerns in several local communities, and costing far beyond what has been typical for past presidents a price tag that, based on past assessments of presidential travel and security costs, could balloon into the hundreds of millions of dollars over the course of a four-year term.
Adding to the costs and complications is Trumps inclination to conduct official business surrounded by crowds of people, such as his decision last weekend to host Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe for a working dinner while Mar-a-Lago members dined nearby.
The handful of government agencies that bear the brunt of the expenses, including the Defense and Homeland Security departments, have not responded to Washington Post requests for data laying out the costs since Trump took office.
* * *
Trumps three Mar-a-Lago trips since the inauguration have likely cost the federal treasury roughly $10 million, based on figures used in an October government report analyzing White House travel, including money for Coast Guard units to patrol the exposed shoreline and other military, security and staffing expenses associated with moving the apparatus of the presidency.
Read more: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-family%E2%80%99s-elaborate-lifestyle-is-a-%E2%80%98logistical-nightmare%E2%80%99-%E2%80%94-at-taxpayer-expense/ar-AAn1H4A?li=BBnb7Kz
NY Times - The Lesson of Nordstrom: Do Business With the Trumps or Else
Less than a month has gone by, and we are well on our way to being a banana republic when it comes to corruption.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/09/opinion/the-lesson-of-nordstrom-do-business-with-the-trumps-or-else.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-right-region®ion=opinion-c-col-right-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-right-region
It is a clear violation of federal ethics rules for White House staff members, or any other federal employees, to use their official positions for private gain. But what President Trump did on Wednesday in his Twitter attack on the Nordstrom department store chain, castigating it for dropping Ms. Trumps line, was far worse.
In sum, Nordstrom made a business decision not to do business with the presidents daughter because her clothing line was not selling well, and the president used his official position to attack the company for this decision.
The presidents tweet posted on his personal account and then re-sent from his White House account is an act of intimidation. Nordstrom interacts with many executive branch agencies: the Department of Labor, the Federal Trade Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Internal Revenue Service and others. Each one of these agencies will be headed by Trump appointees. Most will be staffed with other political appointees as well. The president is telling all of these people that he is very angry with Nordstrom. The message is clear, and it wont take much for a political appointee in some agency to conceive of an ingenious way of ingratiating himself with the White House by making life difficult for the store chain.
Most important, regardless of whether such retaliation actually happens, Nordstrom and the handful of other companies that announced they, too, would drop the line have to live in fear of it for the rest of the Trump administration. And now every other department store knows that it had better not make a similar business decision that displeases the president. In other words, do business with the Trump family and help the Trump family promote its products, or else.
I Got This.
?cache=ucaiw5pkjwTrumps loose talk about Muslims gets weaponized in court against travel ban
Source: Washington Post
Throughout Donald Trumps campaign and now into the first weeks of his presidency, critics suggested that he cool his incendiary rhetoric, that his words matter. His defenders responded that, as Corey Lewandowski said, he was being taken too literally. Some, like Vice President Pence, wrote it off to his colorful style. Trump himself recently explained that his rhetoric about Muslims is popular, winning him standing ovations."
* * *
The states of Washington and Minnesota, which sued to block Trumps order, are citing the presidents inflammatory rhetoric as evidence that the governments claims its not a ban and not aimed at Muslims are shams.
In court papers, Washington and Minnesotas attorneys general have pulled out quotes from speeches, news conferences and interviews as evidence that an executive order the administration argues is neutral was really motivated by animus toward Muslims and a desire to harm a particular group.
His words, the two states say in their brief, show that the President acted in bad faith in an effort to target Muslims. The courts, they say, have both the right and duty to examine Trumps true motives.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/02/07/words-matter-trumps-loose-talk-about-muslims-gets-weaponized-in-court-against-travel-ban/?utm_term=.9adcea272856
The DOJ is essentially arguing that President Trump is publicly lying and should be ignored. Instead, the court should accept the pretext given by the federal government for targeting Muslims, er engaging in extremer vetting.
If the DOJ wins, then all a government needs to do is offer a non-discriminatory pretext that the court must accept regardless of actual evidence of animus.
Vox - The big lesson of Trump's first 2 weeks: resistance works
The question is whether the people can continue to maintain the pressure or will we eventually succumb to facism and fear. You know Trump is ready to go full Wag the Dog at the slightest hint of a terrorist attack involving someone with a foreign sounding name. I am sure the terrorist attack in Canada got Trump's hopes up, but it was committed by a Trump fan on a mosque.
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/2/6/14473482/resistance-works-anti-trump-protests
Its easy to miss amid Donald Trumps frenetic pace of activity and nonstop media coverage, but the most important story in American politics right now isnt about what Trump is doing: Its that the opposition is working.
The millions of people who marched in Washington and other cities around the world on inauguration weekend and then demonstrated again at airports the following weekend are making a concrete difference in the world. So are the tens of thousands whove called members of Congress or showed up in person at their events.
Trump is getting things done, but all presidents do that. Look at what hes not getting done. A Republican-controlled Congress bowed to public outrage over an attempt to water down an ethics office. Trump dramatically downscaled his own executive order barring entry to the United States from seven Muslim-majority countries. Hes having unprecedented difficulty getting his Cabinet nominees confirmed, even though the Senates rules have changed to make confirmations easier than ever. Conservatives in Congress have put their big plans to privatize Medicare and public lands on hold. And the drive to repeal the Affordable Care Act is running into very big trouble.
None of this is based on the discipline and self-restraint on the part of the White House. Its thanks to bold acts of resistance. The result is lives have been saved, many more lives have been demonstrably improved, and the proven template for future success has been created.
How Trump's policies and rhetoric are forging alliances between U.S. Jews and Muslims
Ironic that Trump has unified American Muslims and Jews . . . against him with his Anti-Semitic and Islamophobic rhetoric, policies and staff.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-jew-muslim-2017-story.html
Donald Trump may not be able to forge peace in the Middle East, but he is doing wonders for relations between Jews and Muslims in the United States.
Jewish and Muslim activists in the United States are forging alliances like never before in reaction to the presidents rhetoric and action toward Muslim immigrants.
Many Jewish organizations have interpreted Trumps executive order banning entry by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries as a call to arms. Jewish delegations turned out en masse for a 10,000-strong demonstration Sunday night in New York. (Granddaughter of Holocaust survivors standing with refugees, Muslims immigrants, read one sign.)
Almost every day in New York this last week there was an interfaith conference or prayer service involving Christian groups as well as Muslims and Jews devoted to the current crisis over predominantly Muslim immigrants and refugees.
Is The Trump Administrations Federal Website Purge a Modern Day Nazi Book Burning?
In the 1930s, the Nazi conducted ceremonial book burnings. The books targeted for burning were those viewed as being subversive or as representing ideologies opposed to Nazism. These included books written by Jewish, pacifist, Religious, classical liberal, anarchist, socialist, and communist authors, among others:
Last month, a meteorologist explained why he was trying to preserve federal climate data before Trump takes office in the Washington Post:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/12/13/why-im-trying-to-preserve-federal-climate-data-before-trump-takes-office/?utm_term=.b9ee14e410a8
President-elect Donald Trump has been a purveyor of conspiracy theories when it comes to climate science for years. Hes called human-caused climate change a Chinese hoax and refused to acknowledge the existence of the California drought, promising farmers there that, as president, he would open up the water. Hes vowed to eliminate the EPA and the Energy Department and cancel the Paris Agreement.
Since the election, Trump has been relentlessly converting those anti-science messages into action, wrongly believing that doubling down on fossil fuel production will help boost long-term economic growth. (That Trumps pick for secretary of state ExxonMobil chief executive Rex Tillerson is among the least extreme of his appointments is chilling.)
According to a Sierra Club report, when he assumes the presidency on Jan. 20, Trump will be the only head of state in the world to deny mainstream climate science and yes, that even includes Kim Jong Un of North Korea.
In recent weeks, by surrounding himself with outspoken allies of the fossil fuel industry, promising cuts to NASAs earth science research and sending a threatening questionnaire to Energy Department staff, there is no remaining doubt that Trump is serious about overtly declaring war on science. This isnt a presidential transition. Its an Inquisition. Its a 21st-century book burning.
These fears turned out to be prophetic as the Trump administration has begun a campaign of deleting climate data from federal websites, as well as other data deemed liberal or subversive.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-epa-climatechange-idUSKBN15906G
U.S. President Donald Trump's administration has instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to remove the climate change page from its website, two agency employees told Reuters, the latest move by the newly minted leadership to erase ex-President Barack Obama's climate change initiatives.
The employees were notified by EPA officials on Tuesday that the administration had instructed EPA's communications team to remove the website's climate change page, which contains links to scientific global warming research, as well as detailed data on emissions. The page could go down as early as Wednesday, the sources said.
"If the website goes dark, years of work we have done on climate change will disappear," one of the EPA staffers told Reuters, who added some employees were scrambling to save some of the information housed on the website, or convince the Trump administration to preserve parts of it.
The sources asked not to be named because they were not authorized to speak to the media.
Profile Information
Member since: Fri May 8, 2009, 12:59 AMNumber of posts: 17,387