Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»sulphurdunn's Journal
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sulphurdunn

sulphurdunn's Journal
View sulphurdunn's JournalJournal Subscribe to sulphurdunn (see My DU » Subscriptions)Subscribe View sulphurdunn's public profileProfile View sulphurdunn's recent recommendationsRecommendations Send DU Mail to sulphurdunnSend DU Mail Ignore sulphurdunn (see My DU » Ignore List)Ignore
sulphurdunn's Journal
November 27, 2013

Arctic Methane Releases

I need a scientific opinion. Since methane is much worse than carbon dioxide as a green house gas, would it make more sense, if feasible, to burn it off rather than letting it enter the atmosphere?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/11/131125172113.htm

Posted Wed Nov 27, 2013, 02:22 PM in Environment & Energy » Environment & Energy (5 replies)

Profile Information

Member since: Fri Aug 28, 2009, 06:27 PM
Number of posts: 6,891
Latest Discussions»sulphurdunn's Journal
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.