Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
DemocratsForProgress
DemocratsForProgress's Journal
DemocratsForProgress's Journal
March 1, 2013
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2013/02/28/take-five-cry-if-i-want-to-edition/
Take Five (Cry If I Want To edition)
Jeff Rosenzweig: Take Five (Cry If I Want To edition)ONE: Theres Got to Be a Morning After
On November 7, the sun rose over a Republican Party in bleary-eyed disarray. Clearly, it was time for institutional soul searching, time to push the chair back from the immovable feast of civic ignorance, time to build bridges to women, blacks, Hispanics, the LGBT community, time to stop screeching and politely, respectfully, humbly rejoin the American conversation.
Naturally, none of this happened. Instead, the GOP nonchalantly brushed the cigarette butts off the pizza crusts, shook off its electoral hangover, and resumed its reckless bender. Compromise? Nope. Public interest? Dont care. Policy proposals? Not a chance. Constitution? Screw it.
Theres no better (meaning worse) example of this than Louie Gohmert. The fifth-term Texas Congressman kicked off 2013 by joining with the equally loathsome Paul Broun to nominate Allen West for Speaker of the House, but quickly moved on to what Gohmert considers much more serious business, in this case the defense of the Republic from the grave and gathering threat of, uh sharia law.
Gohmert used a recent appearance on a rightwing radio show to share his thoughts on the topic...
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2013/02/28/take-five-cry-if-i-want-to-edition/
February 27, 2013
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2013/02/27/what-do-you-believe/
Walter Rhett: What Do You Believe?
What do you believe? Who do you believe? And what is the foundation for your beliefs? Those questions were overwhelmed in the noise but were underlined by the rage in the public square this week, on issues from sequestration to the Onions infamous tweet during the Academy Awards.
Defended as free speech and satire, whose firestorm of response by many was evidence of its success, the Onions 140-character post was never covered by the cover it claimed, of being the occasional moment in a society that cherishes free speech, when a good intent to poke fun goes awry.
It was, instead, the perfect example of irresponsible speech, an imitated form of liars rage, a flawed imitation of the disdain that has marked the political language of Republicans, especially, and dominates the airwaves and the internet. This mock and real rage is often packed with lies, to avoid responsibility and to deny its purpose by claiming: look, its absurd. This liars rage is engaged in; denigrating the President and others, often not for their views, but simply because hate is seen as a constitutionally protected act. The Onion poster falls into using liars rage as a mock model. So its okay to call a nine-year old a sexually explicit name. No different than other daily online fare. As long as its just words, and they are not used to incite, the Bill of Rights says speech is free, and restrictions cant be imposed.
The folk who make that argument miss the point: the outrage about the Onion post wasnt over a narrow legal view of whether it violated free speech or whether it was misinterpreted, or as I suggest, its evidence of a cultural faux pas, or whether the rest of us didnt get it. The reaction was a collective, strong-willed assertion that the comment was wrong. Not all free speech is right, and the right to speak or tweet freely doesnt guarantee that what is said will have an equal place in the public square, which also has the right to shout it down...
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2013/02/27/what-do-you-believe/
February 22, 2013
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2013/02/21/take-five-busyness-as-usual-edition/
Take Five (Busyness as Usual edition)
Jeff Rosenzweig: Take Five (Busyness as Usual edition)ONE: Brainy Nights in Georgia
In the wake of the Newtown massacre and other recent mass gun murders, the NRA helpfully busied itself with supporting secession for Wisconsin, decrying the vicious, violent videogames that they insist provoke (conveniently well-armed) people to indulge in vicious violence, and, um, rolling out their new videogame.
In vivid contrast, Georgia legislator Paul Battles, being a pragmatic guy, thought and thought and thought about how best to protect children, and after all that thinking came up with House Bill 35:The Georgia House of Representatives Rules Committee will consider a bill this week that would let school systems arm their staff members. House Bill 35 allows school systems to designate administrators, teachers, or other staff members to carry concealed weapons.
Now, before you go making any mistaken assumptions about Battles, a surprise! Republican, he emphatically rejects the suggestion that hes, you know, a gun nut or something...
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2013/02/21/take-five-busyness-as-usual-edition/
February 20, 2013
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2013/02/20/freedoms-noble-name/
Walter Rhett: Freedom’s Noble Name
Karl Marx would either laugh or be terribly perplexed by what has been wrought from his dialectic. With all of their bluster, the GOP has now stood Marx on his head. Against every assessment of his philosophy, the progress that comes from the clash of opposing forces has come to a standstill, especially in the states, and on jobs and wages. And states are the place where workers have the best knowledge of taxes, services, economic development, wages and power.
And despite wage stagnation, unemployment, low saving rates and other family income issues hiding in plain sight, workers seem unable to unite. Online, support for raising the minimum wage to nine dollars is overwhelming. Yet the expected firestorm of legislative action, lobby days, public rallies, organizing and bill writing at the state level is almost non-existent.
Democrats are missing a chance to take advantage of a winning bi-partisan opportunity, one in which personal interest and motivations meld perfectly with good public policy. One in which plenty of research and previous experience refutes the knee-jerk resistance that Republicans offer, as they never offer a single measure that advances workers income. Real inroads into the Republican base in red states is possible. The growing income gap, the direct refusal of Republicans to consider raising the minimum wage while focused on deficits and cutting spending leaves them exposed. Democrats, Carpe diem!
Robert Reich, President Clintons former Labor Secretary, makes two telling points. One, theres plenty of capital available to pay higher wages; its being used by businesses to buy or take over other corporations or to make giant buybacks of their own stock. Both increase shareholder value. Two, total private worker compensation is now 57% of GDP, the lowest its been since Eisenhower...
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2013/02/20/freedoms-noble-name/
February 13, 2013
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2013/02/13/a-state-of-the-union-address-filled-with-common-sense/
Walter Rhett: A State of the Union Address Filled with Common Sense
My first college course in anthropology instilled in me a profound appreciation for best practices. Its been a personal mission to uncover the best ideas and chart how they work, identifying their structures and functions. One discovery has been that even bad ideas can work well. It sounds strange, but the success of an idea often has nothing to do with its truth or level of insight. Its power and influence has more to do with its context and how it functions with other assumptions and tasks.
We would all prefer strong ideas that work well. Alaskas Iditarod grips my imagination most winters, more than the State of the Union. The long distance grit of lead dogs Andy, Larry, and Granite guiding teams through 50-50-50swinds 50 miles an hour, temperatures 50 degrees below, with visibility less than 50 feetacross wilderness and glaciers is a test of endurance rarely seen in politics. And the Iditarod offers equal opportunity. Susan Butcher won three in a row and four out of five between 1986 and 1990, and once had two dogs killed mid-race by a pregnant moose.
Last nights State of the Union had Speaker Boehner making pregnant moose faces; his uncomfortableness with the Presidents proposals was obviousbut was it a bad idea that served, from Boehners view, a good intent? Did it function to keep the GOP brand alive, apart from the pockets of craziness where they are winning elections, winning not really based on their platform of budgets (most states have laws that require balanced budgets), but more on hot button issues like immigration and race, or winning in one-party states out west?
The President, often criticized as a poor team player, continued to prove he is an effective leader (Susan Butchers dog Granite suffered from the same criticism!) with good ideas. He has also proven he can outrun the lumbering herds of opponents who have not adapted to the new environment and are using outmoded best practices...
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2013/02/13/a-state-of-the-union-address-filled-with-common-sense/
February 8, 2013
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2013/02/07/take-five-the-wrong-remains-the-same-edition/
Take Five (The Wrong Remains the Same edition)
Jeff Rosenzweig: Take Five (The Wrong Remains the Same edition)ONE: What part of second dont you understand?
Did you daydream that Republicans would accept the legitimacy of Barack Obamas renewed mandate and resolve to be a little more cooperative? That restless legions of Teabaggers and assorted civics-challenged bigots would cease their puling about Socialism! and Death Panels! and their frenzied flocking to gun stores and gun shows in advance of an imaginary Obama vendetta against the Second Amendment? That the comically desperate birthers would quietly disperse at last, their tumid fantasies of the Republic being saved by Antonin Scalia and/or Donald Trump deflated for all time?
Yeah, neither did I.
President Obamas second term already seems destined to be as rife as his first with an unrelenting din of obstructionist Republicans, conspiracy cranks and bullet-headed jerks utterly horrified by the Presidents only-half-white pigmentation. Hold your breath and lets start at the very bottom of the barrel.
Although her campaign to become an obstructionist Republican was a characteristically garish failure, Orly Taitz certainly has the conspiracy crank and bullet-headed jerk categories comprehensively covered. The national poster child for every fool out in the darkness aspiring to be a dentist/attorney/fanatic has once again been smacked down from the bench, in this case by District Court Judge Morrison C. England Jr. in Sacramento...
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2013/02/07/take-five-the-wrong-remains-the-same-edition/
February 6, 2013
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2013/02/06/repeal-the-second-amendment/
Walter Rhett: Repeal the Second Amendment!
"Paradox" is often a word that appears in this column; its a fancy way of saying truth embodies its own oppositein other words, there are exceptions to our most cherished beliefs, our proudest achievements, to every law, rule and principle, to mathematical models and even divine intervention, as there is one historically reported exception to the irreversible finality of death.
But in the national debate about guns and death, the National Rifle Association (NRA) makes no exceptions. They claim truth without paradox. Their leadership believes and expresses confidence the Second Amendment doesnt provide for any exceptions. Since no law can stop the use of guns for murder, there should be no laws. Since, in their judgment, old laws were ineffective, there is no need for new laws. Since laws will have loopholes and workarounds, whats the point? Their logic of default hides a fatal flaw found in the paradox of their absolutes.
That paradox is found not in their faith in the gun but in the law. They think the Second Amendment is set in stone. Its not. As with all bad law, it can be repealed. In fact, I will raise the ante and hereby call for its repeal. It wouldnt be the first amendment to be repealed.
Whether successful or not, it opens another political front and will force the NRA to divide its energy and resources. The call for repeal mimics the successful strategy of going after policy issues by swinging for the home runby going after the law which is the context for the policy. The Second Amendment threatens my safety. I have been a victim of robbery at gun point. The right to bear arms has resulted in 1500+ gun connected deaths since the Newtown incident. This cherished ideal is tarnished. I call for the Second Amendments repeal...
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2013/02/06/repeal-the-second-amendment/
Profile Information
Member since: Mon May 28, 2012, 12:11 AMNumber of posts: 545