Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
ShazzieB
ShazzieB's Journal
ShazzieB's Journal
July 28, 2022
Dr. Caitlin Bernard speaks out on "real-life implications" of abortion bans
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/doctor-at-center-of-abortion-debate-speaks-out/Dr. Caitlin Bernard speaks out on "real-life implications" of abortion bans: "Come spend a day in my clinic"
Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist who was thrown into the national spotlight after a 10-year-old rape victim traveled from Ohio to Indiana for an abortion, said the case has made people recognize the impact of laws restricting abortions. According to Indiana records, Bernard is the doctor who provided a medication-induced abortion to the 10-year-old on June 30. Due to privacy laws, she's unable to confirm that.
"I think we're at a time in our country where people are starting to realize the impact of these anti-abortion laws," Bernard told "CBS Evening News" anchor and managing editor Norah O'Donnell in an exclusive television interview on Tuesday.
"This has been going on for a long time becoming harder and harder in many states for people to access abortion," she said. "And now when it's finally become impossible for some people, we're realizing what that is going to look like, what the real-life implications are for people who need abortion care. I think people realize that that is actually not what they intended. That is not what they want for children, for women, to be put in these situations of life-threatening conditions, of traumatic pregnancies. They realize that abortion needs to be safe and legal."
*snip*
"When you take away the right to privacy in your medical decision-making, it puts you in a situation where you don't know where to turn," she said. "And it makes it incredibly difficult, not just to provide abortion care, but full-spectrum reproductive health care. You know, this will affect our ability to take care of miscarriages. This will affect our ability to take care of complications in early pregnancy that could kill someone. This will affect our ability to provide infertility treatment, contraception, the list goes on."
More: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/abortion-bans-caitlin-bernard-doctor/
Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist who was thrown into the national spotlight after a 10-year-old rape victim traveled from Ohio to Indiana for an abortion, said the case has made people recognize the impact of laws restricting abortions. According to Indiana records, Bernard is the doctor who provided a medication-induced abortion to the 10-year-old on June 30. Due to privacy laws, she's unable to confirm that.
"I think we're at a time in our country where people are starting to realize the impact of these anti-abortion laws," Bernard told "CBS Evening News" anchor and managing editor Norah O'Donnell in an exclusive television interview on Tuesday.
"This has been going on for a long time becoming harder and harder in many states for people to access abortion," she said. "And now when it's finally become impossible for some people, we're realizing what that is going to look like, what the real-life implications are for people who need abortion care. I think people realize that that is actually not what they intended. That is not what they want for children, for women, to be put in these situations of life-threatening conditions, of traumatic pregnancies. They realize that abortion needs to be safe and legal."
*snip*
"When you take away the right to privacy in your medical decision-making, it puts you in a situation where you don't know where to turn," she said. "And it makes it incredibly difficult, not just to provide abortion care, but full-spectrum reproductive health care. You know, this will affect our ability to take care of miscarriages. This will affect our ability to take care of complications in early pregnancy that could kill someone. This will affect our ability to provide infertility treatment, contraception, the list goes on."
More: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/abortion-bans-caitlin-bernard-doctor/
July 28, 2022
It's kind of a long article, but I found it to be a very interesting read.
Yes, Donald Trump Is at Significant Risk of Federal Prosecution
Yes, Donald Trump Is at Significant Risk of Federal Prosecution
Just one week after the Jan. 6 House Select committee wrapped up a set of summer hearings that exposed Donald Trumps deep culpability for the events of Jan. 6, things have started to look much worse for the former president. On top of the Congressional inquiry, the start of the week brought fresh reporting that a federal grand jury is accelerating its probe into Trumps attempt to overturn the 2020 election.
On Tuesday, the New York Times broke a story disclosing important emails and admissions about the scheme to submit fake electors to Congress that the 2020 Trump campaign, Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, and their lawyer-friends ran in six battleground states (plus New Mexico) after losing the election. Not to be outdone, the Washington Post published a scoop a few hours later confirming that the Department of Justice has turned to directly investigating Trumps actions.
The Post reports that the scope of the grand jury inquiry includes the fake electors scheme, Trumps direct involvement in it, and his efforts to press Vice President Mike Pence to utilize those phony certificates as part of a plan to overturn the election. The publication also noted that there was a parallel track to the investigation that could ultimately lead to additional scrutiny of Trump. That track would expand on the seditious conspiracy and conspiracy to obstruct a government proceeding probe that has already resulted in indictments against the leader of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. According to the Post, investigators are now not just looking at individuals who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, but also scrutinizing those who were allegedly involved in planning the days events.
The Posts confirmation matters, even though, to quote a line from Hamlet, There needs no ghost, my lord, come from the grave to tell us this. It has been obvious, and we have said so in Slate for many months, that Donald Trump is at significant risk of federal prosecutionas he should be, given the evidence now in the public record.
MORE: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/07/donald-trump-doj-prosecution-risk-high.html
Just one week after the Jan. 6 House Select committee wrapped up a set of summer hearings that exposed Donald Trumps deep culpability for the events of Jan. 6, things have started to look much worse for the former president. On top of the Congressional inquiry, the start of the week brought fresh reporting that a federal grand jury is accelerating its probe into Trumps attempt to overturn the 2020 election.
On Tuesday, the New York Times broke a story disclosing important emails and admissions about the scheme to submit fake electors to Congress that the 2020 Trump campaign, Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, and their lawyer-friends ran in six battleground states (plus New Mexico) after losing the election. Not to be outdone, the Washington Post published a scoop a few hours later confirming that the Department of Justice has turned to directly investigating Trumps actions.
The Post reports that the scope of the grand jury inquiry includes the fake electors scheme, Trumps direct involvement in it, and his efforts to press Vice President Mike Pence to utilize those phony certificates as part of a plan to overturn the election. The publication also noted that there was a parallel track to the investigation that could ultimately lead to additional scrutiny of Trump. That track would expand on the seditious conspiracy and conspiracy to obstruct a government proceeding probe that has already resulted in indictments against the leader of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. According to the Post, investigators are now not just looking at individuals who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, but also scrutinizing those who were allegedly involved in planning the days events.
The Posts confirmation matters, even though, to quote a line from Hamlet, There needs no ghost, my lord, come from the grave to tell us this. It has been obvious, and we have said so in Slate for many months, that Donald Trump is at significant risk of federal prosecutionas he should be, given the evidence now in the public record.
MORE: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/07/donald-trump-doj-prosecution-risk-high.html
It's kind of a long article, but I found it to be a very interesting read.
July 20, 2022
The rest of the article consists of the author's interview with Mary Ziegler, a professor at the University of California, Davis School of Law and a preeminent expert on the history of abortion in the United States. I strongly urge reading the whole thing, as it contains some shockers. The rules here won't allow me to post enough to give you the full flavor, but here's the part that I personally found most disturbing:
Source:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/07/10-year-old-girl-rape-ohio-abortion-incest-life-exceptions.html
Did you all get that? These anti-abortion freaks think occasionally letting a pregnant person die unnecessarily is worth it if that prevents an abortion here and there! They really do! Anyone with a uterus is expendable to them; but beings that cannot live outside a uterus are not! GAH!
WTF is WRONG with these (so-called) people?
The Real Reason Why the GOP Is Rushing to Pass Abortion Bans Without Exceptions for Rape
BY MARK JOSEPH STERN
The Supreme Courts June 24 decision overruling Roe v. Wade unleashed an immediate and relentless flood of cruelty against pregnant Americans. Child victims of rape and incest, including a 10-year-old girl in Ohio, must cross state lines to obtain abortions. Patients undergoing a miscarriage are compelled to bleed out for days and risk sepsis before doctors are willing to terminate their pregnancies. Those with ectopic pregnancies, which are lethal and non-viable, are denied treatment due to the presence of a fetal heartbeat. Women suspected of being pregnant are denied vital treatment for autoimmune disorders because they happen to induce abortion, too.
In the face of these horror stories, the anti-abortion movement has doubled down. Jim Bopp, general counsel for the National Right to Life, said that the 10-year-old girl rape victim Ohio should have been forced to carry her rapists fetus, telling Politico: She would have had the baby, and as many women who have had babies as a result of rape, we would hope that she would understand the reason and ultimately the benefit of having the child. Other anti-abortion groups condemned the girls abortion as violence perpetuated against her. And John Seago, the president of Texas Right to Life, acknowledged that abortion bans may cause doctors to delay care for miscarriage patients until complications arise.
These organizations are defending a legal regime that they helped to craft. Most post-Roe abortion bans contain no exception for rape or incest, and only an extremely vague, narrow exception to protect the life of the mother. These laws are crafted to outlaw abortion in all but the most dire circumstances, when the patient is actively dying because of pregnancyand even then, the bans are so ambiguous that doctors fear liability if they terminate.
In the face of these horror stories, the anti-abortion movement has doubled down. Jim Bopp, general counsel for the National Right to Life, said that the 10-year-old girl rape victim Ohio should have been forced to carry her rapists fetus, telling Politico: She would have had the baby, and as many women who have had babies as a result of rape, we would hope that she would understand the reason and ultimately the benefit of having the child. Other anti-abortion groups condemned the girls abortion as violence perpetuated against her. And John Seago, the president of Texas Right to Life, acknowledged that abortion bans may cause doctors to delay care for miscarriage patients until complications arise.
These organizations are defending a legal regime that they helped to craft. Most post-Roe abortion bans contain no exception for rape or incest, and only an extremely vague, narrow exception to protect the life of the mother. These laws are crafted to outlaw abortion in all but the most dire circumstances, when the patient is actively dying because of pregnancyand even then, the bans are so ambiguous that doctors fear liability if they terminate.
The rest of the article consists of the author's interview with Mary Ziegler, a professor at the University of California, Davis School of Law and a preeminent expert on the history of abortion in the United States. I strongly urge reading the whole thing, as it contains some shockers. The rules here won't allow me to post enough to give you the full flavor, but here's the part that I personally found most disturbing:
STERN: My sense is that many anti-abortion advocates believe it is worth risking the death of the patient by providing extremely narrow health exemptions in order to spare a maximum number of fetuses from termination. Do you think thats fair?
ZIEGLER: I think thats fair. There has been a growing push to get rid of life-saving exceptions. In the worldview most folks in the anti-abortion movement have, abortion is murder. Its worse not only in the sense that its certain death, but that its intentional. From their standpoint, if some women die because theyre refused care, that isnt a certain death, there isnt intentionally going to be a death, so thats the lesser of the evils in that situation.
ZIEGLER: I think thats fair. There has been a growing push to get rid of life-saving exceptions. In the worldview most folks in the anti-abortion movement have, abortion is murder. Its worse not only in the sense that its certain death, but that its intentional. From their standpoint, if some women die because theyre refused care, that isnt a certain death, there isnt intentionally going to be a death, so thats the lesser of the evils in that situation.
Source:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/07/10-year-old-girl-rape-ohio-abortion-incest-life-exceptions.html
Did you all get that? These anti-abortion freaks think occasionally letting a pregnant person die unnecessarily is worth it if that prevents an abortion here and there! They really do! Anyone with a uterus is expendable to them; but beings that cannot live outside a uterus are not! GAH!
WTF is WRONG with these (so-called) people?
July 20, 2022
The rest of the article consists of the author's interview with Mary Ziegler, a professor at the University of California, Davis School of Law and a preeminent expert on the history of abortion in the United States. I strongly urge reading the whole thing, as it contains some shockers. The rules here won't allow me to post enough to give you the full flavor, but here's the part that I personally found most disturbing:
Source:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/07/10-year-old-girl-rape-ohio-abortion-incest-life-exceptions.html
Did you all get that? These anti-abortion freaks think occasionally letting a pregnant person die unnecessarily is worth it if that prevents an abortion here and there! They really do! Anyone with a uterus is expendable to them; but beings that cannot live outside a uterus are not! GAH!
WTF is WRONG with these (so-called) people?
The Real Reason Why the GOP Is Rushing to Pass Abortion Bans Without Exceptions for Rape
BY MARK JOSEPH STERN
The Supreme Courts June 24 decision overruling Roe v. Wade unleashed an immediate and relentless flood of cruelty against pregnant Americans. Child victims of rape and incest, including a 10-year-old girl in Ohio, must cross state lines to obtain abortions. Patients undergoing a miscarriage are compelled to bleed out for days and risk sepsis before doctors are willing to terminate their pregnancies. Those with ectopic pregnancies, which are lethal and non-viable, are denied treatment due to the presence of a fetal heartbeat. Women suspected of being pregnant are denied vital treatment for autoimmune disorders because they happen to induce abortion, too.
In the face of these horror stories, the anti-abortion movement has doubled down. Jim Bopp, general counsel for the National Right to Life, said that the 10-year-old girl rape victim Ohio should have been forced to carry her rapists fetus, telling Politico: She would have had the baby, and as many women who have had babies as a result of rape, we would hope that she would understand the reason and ultimately the benefit of having the child. Other anti-abortion groups condemned the girls abortion as violence perpetuated against her. And John Seago, the president of Texas Right to Life, acknowledged that abortion bans may cause doctors to delay care for miscarriage patients until complications arise.
These organizations are defending a legal regime that they helped to craft. Most post-Roe abortion bans contain no exception for rape or incest, and only an extremely vague, narrow exception to protect the life of the mother. These laws are crafted to outlaw abortion in all but the most dire circumstances, when the patient is actively dying because of pregnancyand even then, the bans are so ambiguous that doctors fear liability if they terminate.
In the face of these horror stories, the anti-abortion movement has doubled down. Jim Bopp, general counsel for the National Right to Life, said that the 10-year-old girl rape victim Ohio should have been forced to carry her rapists fetus, telling Politico: She would have had the baby, and as many women who have had babies as a result of rape, we would hope that she would understand the reason and ultimately the benefit of having the child. Other anti-abortion groups condemned the girls abortion as violence perpetuated against her. And John Seago, the president of Texas Right to Life, acknowledged that abortion bans may cause doctors to delay care for miscarriage patients until complications arise.
These organizations are defending a legal regime that they helped to craft. Most post-Roe abortion bans contain no exception for rape or incest, and only an extremely vague, narrow exception to protect the life of the mother. These laws are crafted to outlaw abortion in all but the most dire circumstances, when the patient is actively dying because of pregnancyand even then, the bans are so ambiguous that doctors fear liability if they terminate.
The rest of the article consists of the author's interview with Mary Ziegler, a professor at the University of California, Davis School of Law and a preeminent expert on the history of abortion in the United States. I strongly urge reading the whole thing, as it contains some shockers. The rules here won't allow me to post enough to give you the full flavor, but here's the part that I personally found most disturbing:
STERN: My sense is that many anti-abortion advocates believe it is worth risking the death of the patient by providing extremely narrow health exemptions in order to spare a maximum number of fetuses from termination. Do you think thats fair?
ZIEGLER: I think thats fair. There has been a growing push to get rid of life-saving exceptions. In the worldview most folks in the anti-abortion movement have, abortion is murder. Its worse not only in the sense that its certain death, but that its intentional. From their standpoint, if some women die because theyre refused care, that isnt a certain death, there isnt intentionally going to be a death, so thats the lesser of the evils in that situation.
ZIEGLER: I think thats fair. There has been a growing push to get rid of life-saving exceptions. In the worldview most folks in the anti-abortion movement have, abortion is murder. Its worse not only in the sense that its certain death, but that its intentional. From their standpoint, if some women die because theyre refused care, that isnt a certain death, there isnt intentionally going to be a death, so thats the lesser of the evils in that situation.
Source:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/07/10-year-old-girl-rape-ohio-abortion-incest-life-exceptions.html
Did you all get that? These anti-abortion freaks think occasionally letting a pregnant person die unnecessarily is worth it if that prevents an abortion here and there! They really do! Anyone with a uterus is expendable to them; but beings that cannot live outside a uterus are not! GAH!
WTF is WRONG with these (so-called) people?
July 17, 2022
I thought this might be good for a few laughs. People who live in glass houses, am I right?
Congresswoman who wants children banned from drag shows says WHAT?
Lauren Boebert Claims Husband Only Exposed Himself to Teen Girl Because She Begged for ItRep. Lauren Boebert (R-Co.)or brunette Marjorie Taylor Greenehas apparently written a memoir, and its rife with details somehow more shocking than the fact that the gun-loving congresswoman is literate enough to write a book. In My American Life, released on Tuesday, Boebert, whos spent the better part of the last couple months railing against groomers and the great safety risk drag shows pose to children, goes to bat for her hunky husband, who once served jail time for public indecency and lewd exposure after exposing himself to a teen at a bowling alley. Boebert claims this is all based on a misunderstanding.
According to Boebert, on the night in question, her now-husband and then-boyfriend Jayson Boebert had been bonding over drinks with her stepfather and some friends at Fireside Lane Bowling Alley in Rifle, Colorado (of course). It was totally a family affair, until an apparently nosy, 17-year-old bartender barged in, lusting after Jayson, who, err looks like this:
According to Lauren, Jaysons friends had told the bartenderagain, a teenage girlabout a great tattoo Jayson had in a private area, which made her curious, so she pressed Jayson to show it to her right there at the bar. Lauren claims the teen girl simply wouldnt stop asking to see the private tattoo, and it was only then, after her repeated begging (uh huh), that Jayson merely acted like he was going to unzip his pants after having too much to drink.
When the bowling alleys owner confronted Jayson and asked him to leave, he refused. The two argued, and Jayson threw a basket of fries at the owner, Lauren casually wrote. The police were called. Boys will be boys!
Go here for lots more on Jaysin's criminal past: https://jezebel.com/lauren-boebert-claims-husband-only-exposed-himself-to-t-1849173531
https://jezebel.com/lauren-boebert-claims-husband-only-exposed-himself-to-t-1849173531
According to Boebert, on the night in question, her now-husband and then-boyfriend Jayson Boebert had been bonding over drinks with her stepfather and some friends at Fireside Lane Bowling Alley in Rifle, Colorado (of course). It was totally a family affair, until an apparently nosy, 17-year-old bartender barged in, lusting after Jayson, who, err looks like this:
According to Lauren, Jaysons friends had told the bartenderagain, a teenage girlabout a great tattoo Jayson had in a private area, which made her curious, so she pressed Jayson to show it to her right there at the bar. Lauren claims the teen girl simply wouldnt stop asking to see the private tattoo, and it was only then, after her repeated begging (uh huh), that Jayson merely acted like he was going to unzip his pants after having too much to drink.
When the bowling alleys owner confronted Jayson and asked him to leave, he refused. The two argued, and Jayson threw a basket of fries at the owner, Lauren casually wrote. The police were called. Boys will be boys!
Go here for lots more on Jaysin's criminal past: https://jezebel.com/lauren-boebert-claims-husband-only-exposed-himself-to-t-1849173531
https://jezebel.com/lauren-boebert-claims-husband-only-exposed-himself-to-t-1849173531
I thought this might be good for a few laughs. People who live in glass houses, am I right?
July 14, 2022
The full list is here: https://www.timeout.com/things-to-do/best-cities-in-the-world
Chicago is the 2nd Best City in the World, According to a New List
If you live in the Chicago area, you don't have to travel very far to visit the second-best city in the world, a new list says. According to the 2022 Time Out index, more than 20,000 city-dwellers ranked Chicago as the No. 2 city in the world based on nightlife, food and drink, arts and culture, along with affordability, walkability, public transportation and more.
"Whether you want to try world-class dining, party until 4am at historic clubs, spend a day soaking up the sun along Lake Michigan, see iconic artworks or just wander among different neighborhoods, theres never a dull moment to be had (yes, even when winter rolls around)," the report says.
The list, comprised of 53 cities, specifically highlights Chicago's food and beverage scene, naming that as a top reason to visit, noting the city boasts the countrys first-ever Michelin-starred Filipino tasting menu.
And, the Windy City is the only one in the United States to make the top 10.
Read more to see which cities round out the top 20: https://www.timeout.com/things-to-do/best-cities-in-the-world
"Whether you want to try world-class dining, party until 4am at historic clubs, spend a day soaking up the sun along Lake Michigan, see iconic artworks or just wander among different neighborhoods, theres never a dull moment to be had (yes, even when winter rolls around)," the report says.
The list, comprised of 53 cities, specifically highlights Chicago's food and beverage scene, naming that as a top reason to visit, noting the city boasts the countrys first-ever Michelin-starred Filipino tasting menu.
And, the Windy City is the only one in the United States to make the top 10.
Read more to see which cities round out the top 20: https://www.timeout.com/things-to-do/best-cities-in-the-world
The full list is here: https://www.timeout.com/things-to-do/best-cities-in-the-world
July 13, 2022
The little guy chomping on the ice really cracks me up.
Thought some of my DU cohorts might enjoy this!
The little guy chomping on the ice really cracks me up.
July 4, 2022
This is exactly the kind of idiocy that women in red states in the U.S.have to look forward to now, thanks to the Extreme Court.
How this American on vacation survived after Malta denied her a life-saving abortion.
American Andrea Prudente was a denied a life-saving abortion while on vacation in Malta. She flew to Spain and received care on the day Roe was overturned.
An American woman vacationing in Malta was denied a life-saving abortion while miscarrying. She was able to leave the country and get care in Spain, on what happened to be the day Roe v. Wade was overturned in the U.S.
Andrea Prudente, 38, and Jay Weeldreyer, 45, planned to leave their babymoon in Malta with a slew of pictures and cherished memories. Instead, they left on an emergency flight to Spain. Malta has one of the strictest anti-abortion laws in the world something the couple didn't know before booking their vacation, as TODAY Parents previously reported.
"A doctor overseeing my care in Malta told me my baby was going to die," Prudente told TODAY Parents while recovering in Majorca, Spain. "He said I was at risk of infection and hemorrhage, but because of the abortion laws in Malta he couldn't do anything for me."
*snip*
Malta is one of only a few countries in the European Union to ban abortion. Because doctors could still detect a fetal heartbeat, it was illegal to end Prudente's nonviable pregnancy.
*snip*
Dr. Isabel Stabile, a gynecologist and Doctors for Choice member practicing in Malta, reviewed Prudentes medical notes and confirmed her water did break and that there was next to no amniotic fluid left. Theres no way her baby could have survived.
Prudente and her partner decided the safest option was to fly to neighboring Spain, where she could obtain an abortion to safely help her body evacuate the pregnancy.
More: https://www.today.com/parents/pregnancy/malta-abortion-ban-vacation-american-woman-rcna35658 (No paywall, as far as I can tell.)
Andrea Prudente, 38, and Jay Weeldreyer, 45, planned to leave their babymoon in Malta with a slew of pictures and cherished memories. Instead, they left on an emergency flight to Spain. Malta has one of the strictest anti-abortion laws in the world something the couple didn't know before booking their vacation, as TODAY Parents previously reported.
"A doctor overseeing my care in Malta told me my baby was going to die," Prudente told TODAY Parents while recovering in Majorca, Spain. "He said I was at risk of infection and hemorrhage, but because of the abortion laws in Malta he couldn't do anything for me."
*snip*
Malta is one of only a few countries in the European Union to ban abortion. Because doctors could still detect a fetal heartbeat, it was illegal to end Prudente's nonviable pregnancy.
*snip*
Dr. Isabel Stabile, a gynecologist and Doctors for Choice member practicing in Malta, reviewed Prudentes medical notes and confirmed her water did break and that there was next to no amniotic fluid left. Theres no way her baby could have survived.
Prudente and her partner decided the safest option was to fly to neighboring Spain, where she could obtain an abortion to safely help her body evacuate the pregnancy.
More: https://www.today.com/parents/pregnancy/malta-abortion-ban-vacation-american-woman-rcna35658 (No paywall, as far as I can tell.)
This is exactly the kind of idiocy that women in red states in the U.S.have to look forward to now, thanks to the Extreme Court.
July 4, 2022
This is exactly the kind of idiocy that women in red states in the U.S.have to look forward to now, thanks to the Extreme Court.
How this American on vacation survived after Malta denied her a life-saving abortion.
American Andrea Prudente was a denied a life-saving abortion while on vacation in Malta. She flew to Spain and received care on the day Roe was overturned.
An American woman vacationing in Malta was denied a life-saving abortion while miscarrying. She was able to leave the country and get care in Spain, on what happened to be the day Roe v. Wade was overturned in the U.S.
Andrea Prudente, 38, and Jay Weeldreyer, 45, planned to leave their babymoon in Malta with a slew of pictures and cherished memories. Instead, they left on an emergency flight to Spain. Malta has one of the strictest anti-abortion laws in the world something the couple didn't know before booking their vacation, as TODAY Parents previously reported.
"A doctor overseeing my care in Malta told me my baby was going to die," Prudente told TODAY Parents while recovering in Majorca, Spain. "He said I was at risk of infection and hemorrhage, but because of the abortion laws in Malta he couldn't do anything for me."
*snip*
Malta is one of only a few countries in the European Union to ban abortion. Because doctors could still detect a fetal heartbeat, it was illegal to end Prudente's nonviable pregnancy.
*snip*
Dr. Isabel Stabile, a gynecologist and Doctors for Choice member practicing in Malta, reviewed Prudentes medical notes and confirmed her water did break and that there was next to no amniotic fluid left. Theres no way her baby could have survived.
Prudente and her partner decided the safest option was to fly to neighboring Spain, where she could obtain an abortion to safely help her body evacuate the pregnancy.
More: https://www.today.com/parents/pregnancy/malta-abortion-ban-vacation-american-woman-rcna35658 (No paywall, as far as I can tell.)
Andrea Prudente, 38, and Jay Weeldreyer, 45, planned to leave their babymoon in Malta with a slew of pictures and cherished memories. Instead, they left on an emergency flight to Spain. Malta has one of the strictest anti-abortion laws in the world something the couple didn't know before booking their vacation, as TODAY Parents previously reported.
"A doctor overseeing my care in Malta told me my baby was going to die," Prudente told TODAY Parents while recovering in Majorca, Spain. "He said I was at risk of infection and hemorrhage, but because of the abortion laws in Malta he couldn't do anything for me."
*snip*
Malta is one of only a few countries in the European Union to ban abortion. Because doctors could still detect a fetal heartbeat, it was illegal to end Prudente's nonviable pregnancy.
*snip*
Dr. Isabel Stabile, a gynecologist and Doctors for Choice member practicing in Malta, reviewed Prudentes medical notes and confirmed her water did break and that there was next to no amniotic fluid left. Theres no way her baby could have survived.
Prudente and her partner decided the safest option was to fly to neighboring Spain, where she could obtain an abortion to safely help her body evacuate the pregnancy.
More: https://www.today.com/parents/pregnancy/malta-abortion-ban-vacation-american-woman-rcna35658 (No paywall, as far as I can tell.)
This is exactly the kind of idiocy that women in red states in the U.S.have to look forward to now, thanks to the Extreme Court.
July 3, 2022
PLEASE NOTE: The above image is NOT interactive. The interactive map can be found here: https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/
Abortion After Roe: New Comprehensive Map Tracks Abortion Policies and Statistics for Each State
This article is a few weeks old, but it sounds like the map is going to be kept up to date.
Interactive map captures abortion-related policies and data, and categorizes states from most restrictive to most protective
With the US Supreme Court poised to severely curtail or overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 decision that confirmed the constitutional right to abortion, the Guttmacher Institute today released a new interactive map to track the legal status of abortion across the United States. The map groups states into seven categories based on their abortion policies, ranging from most restrictive to most protective, and provides information about the specific policies currently in effect in each state.
The new tool is designed to help reporters, policymakers, advocates, researchers and other audiences understand the increasingly complex and rapidly changing landscape of abortion rights and access at the state level.
More: https://www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2022/abortion-after-roe-new-comprehensive-map-tracks-abortion-policies-and-statistics
With the US Supreme Court poised to severely curtail or overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 decision that confirmed the constitutional right to abortion, the Guttmacher Institute today released a new interactive map to track the legal status of abortion across the United States. The map groups states into seven categories based on their abortion policies, ranging from most restrictive to most protective, and provides information about the specific policies currently in effect in each state.
The new tool is designed to help reporters, policymakers, advocates, researchers and other audiences understand the increasingly complex and rapidly changing landscape of abortion rights and access at the state level.
More: https://www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2022/abortion-after-roe-new-comprehensive-map-tracks-abortion-policies-and-statistics
PLEASE NOTE: The above image is NOT interactive. The interactive map can be found here: https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/
Profile Information
Name: SharonGender: Female
Hometown: Chicago area, IL
Home country: USA
Member since: Tue Mar 26, 2013, 04:18 AM
Number of posts: 16,529