TeddyR
TeddyR's Journal"Forget new gun laws. Here’s what could really keep people from shooting each other."
Gun violence is most acute among young black men. The National Council on Crime and Delinquency says the homicide rate per 100,000 of white males between 15 and 19 years old is 1.8. For Hispanic males, its 14.6.
For African American males, its a staggering 50.6 per 100,000.
Only recently, Richmond, Calif., had among Americas highest per capita rates of gun violence. In 2009, there were 47 homicides among 100,000 residents. Officials there theorized that a few bad actors caused most of the problem. As it turned out, 70 percent of their gun violence in 2008 was caused by fewer than 1 percent of the citys residents. This isnt unique: in Cincinnati, less than 1 percent of the citys population was responsible for 74 percent of homicides in 2007.
Richmond developed an innovative, controversial program: They identified the 50 people most likely to shoot someone and engaged with them, even paying them to participate.
The city provided career help, training, resume writing and health care. It asked people what they feared and helped them create plans to mitigate those fears.
Critics called it paying gang members not to shoot people. It was more than that. And it worked.
From 2007 to 2012, the city experienced a 61 percent reduction in homicides. It turned out that the money was nowhere near as important as people had thought people still show up to the meetings even though no one is paying them anymore. The interventions steered potential killers onto a better path.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/07/14/forget-new-gun-laws-heres-what-could-really-keep-people-from-shooting-each-other/
FiveThirtyEight has a piece titled "Gun Deaths in America"
That contains various graphs showing number of gun deaths that are suicides, homicides, etc. There isn't any new info here but I thought the takeaway from the last graph was key, and a point often made here: "The common element in all these deaths is a gun. But the causes are very different, and that means the solutions must be, too." As many have argued in this forum, it is disingenuous to put all gun deaths into a single bucket when promoting gun control. Link to story - http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/gun-deaths/
Interesting article (I thought) "Police Shootings Highlight Unease Among Black Gun Owners"
From the New York Times.
But the issues of race, policing and gun rights have turned into a volatile mix after two officer-involved shootings of black men thought to have guns in recent days and the killing and wounding of officers by snipers during a protest Thursday night.
***
The shooting of Philando Castile in the St. Paul suburb of Falcon Heights comes at a time when more blacks appear to view gun ownership as way to shield them from violence. Black communities suffer from gun violence at much higher rates than white ones, but 54 percent of black people said guns did more to protect than endanger personal safety, according to a 2014 Pew Research survey. That is up from 29 percent two years earlier.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/09/us/black-gun-owners-police-shootings.html
Washington Post's profile of Officer Zamarripa
One of five killed in Dallas
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/07/08/in-shock-officer-patrick-zamarripa-survived-tours-in-iraq-before-being-killed-in-dallas/?postshare=6971467990903921&tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.f795061dad38
"Hillary Clinton’s email problems might be even worse than we thought"
This is Chris Cillizza's (from the Washington Post) take on the announcement today. I think they probably get the tone right - although no indictment is a win some of the statement's from the FBI aren't helpful. I'm not sure any of this really changes the race - no indictment but could have been better. It is important to keep in mind that the WaPo has been a Hillary cheerleader almost from the beginning, so this isn't like Fox News saying the outcome wasn't good for Hillary.
Those are facts, facts delivered by the Justice Department of a Democratic administration. And those facts run absolutely counter to the narrative put forth by the Clinton operation: that this whole thing was a Republican witch-hunt pushed by a bored and adversarial media.
***
For a candidate already badly struggling on questions of whether she is honest and trustworthy enough to hold the office to which she aspires, Comey's comments are devastating. Watching them, I could close my eyes and imagine them spliced into a bevy of 30-second ads all of which end with the FBI director rebuking Clinton as "extremely careless."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/
Disclaimer - this is not an attack on Hillary.
Profile Information
Name: SeanGender: Male
Hometown: Asheville NC
Home country: USA
Current location: Arlington VA
Member since: Sat Jun 27, 2015, 02:01 PM
Number of posts: 2,493